Monday, April 16th 2012 - 06:02 UTC

Uruguay became prisoner of Argentina, when it rejected a free trade accord with the US

Uruguay has fallen prisoner of Mercosur and Argentina because it did not sign the free trade agreement with the United States which was offered to the country in the previous government of Tabare Vazquez, said two-times President Julio Maria Sanguinetti.

Twice democratically elected president, Julio Maria Sanguinetti 1985/1990 and 1995/2000

“President (Jose) Mujica is paying the consequences of the mistakes committed by his predecessor, president Vazquez. He had in his hands the chance of a FTA with the US, but finally he desisted and now we are prisoners of Mercosur and Argentina”, said Sanguinetti pointing out that the left leaning ruling coalition, Broad Front rejected such an option.

Likewise Sanguinetti described relations with the Argentine government are ‘very bad’ because Argentina does not assume its responsibilities as a member of Mercosur. However Uruguay should not abandon the trade group.

“The four full members of Mercosur can apply whatever economic policy they wish, but what we can’t do is ignore treaties and contracts. If a treaty says merchandise can circulate freely among country members, we can’t elude that responsibility. Argentina can do whatever they wish with the rest of the world, but inside Mercosur must abide by the rules. Mercosur as it is currently, even the government admits it, is not working: expectations and realities have turned into frustrations, and Uruguay will have to review the situation”, pointed out the two times president.

However Uruguay must not break off unilaterally from Mercosur, but rather discuss inside Mercosur and with third countries, said Sanguinetti who then mentioned as an example to follow the free trade agreement Uruguay has with Mexico.

“We don’t have the capacity to damage Argentina or Brazil: it’s a simple matter of size. And for the same reason the so called ‘mirror counter measures’ are nonsense. It’s like fighting with Mike Tyson: sure we could manage a first rather soft jab but then prepare for the really big punch!! So we must go out to the world and negotiate trade liberalization agreements and hope that Mercosur reacts, because it’s not only a question of trade barriers and quotas. Mercosur is far more than that and it is being repeatedly violated”.

Finally Sanguinetti said that the two Broad Front coalition governments (under presidents Vazquez and currently Mujica) have enjoyed a fantastic and unique economic bonanza period for Uruguay and the whole of South America.

“In that context and in spite of what the Broad Front promised, the great merit has been that they have both continued with pre-established policies referred to foreign debt management, fiscal balance, exchange rate, an open economy. The problems and shortcomings refer to what they tried to change and has turned into real disasters: law and order is appalling; education even worse and the lack of investments in energy, telecommunications and infrastructure conditions development in coming years, it is very serious” indicated Sanguinetti.

Nevertheless, “we must admit Mujica inherited all these problems from Vazquez and has had the sincerity of admitting the problems, but simply does not know how to address them”.
 

12 comments Feed

Note: Comments do not reflect MercoPress’ opinions. They are the personal view of our users. We wish to keep this as open and unregulated as possible. However, rude or foul language, discriminative comments (based on ethnicity, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation or the sort), spamming or any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. Please report any inadequate posts to the editor. Comments must be in English. Thank you.

1 Bubba (#) Apr 16th, 2012 - 02:00 pm Report abuse
Cut off your nose and crap like this happens..
2 GeoffWard2 (#) Apr 16th, 2012 - 02:33 pm Report abuse
..... and now Uruguay must sink, along with Argentina.

But perhaps they might break away from Mercosur, and do the deal now ..... better late than never.
3 GreekYoghurt (#) Apr 16th, 2012 - 02:55 pm Report abuse
What a classic tit.

.. oh well, about time to go back to USA on bended knee.
4 rylang23 (#) Apr 16th, 2012 - 03:45 pm Report abuse
”Beware of Greeks (or the US Government) bearing gifts“. It never works out how you imagined it. Tribute is expected. The previous comments here seem to not understand the long history of ”sweet trade deals“ with the US. Next there will be ”small, inconsequential“ US military bases on the frontier with Brazil, and Monsanto will be taking over the Ministry of Agriculture.

Maybe Uruguay is being appropriately ”careful”.
5 GeoffWard2 (#) Apr 16th, 2012 - 08:06 pm Report abuse
ry #4
From what you imply, nobody should do business with firms with a US interest.
Are they really so much worse than those elsewhere around the world, or are they just bigger with higher turnovers?
6 Ernie4001 (#) Apr 16th, 2012 - 08:59 pm Report abuse
Uruguay must turn to the Pacific. Has been a lot of time wasted and I wonder how an intelligent country can bet to the past.
7 rylang23 (#) Apr 16th, 2012 - 10:24 pm Report abuse
Geoff... I am referring to the unstated goals of US empire, and the unexpected demands that have always been placed on countries who want the promised trade. US corporations always win. That cannot be said for the trading “partner”.
8 GeoffWard2 (#) Apr 17th, 2012 - 11:40 am Report abuse
ry #7
I see a HUGE re-orientation of trading partners across most of South America.

China has made a massive re-evaluation in the US of the power-relationships brought about by asymmetric trade.

Chevron realises this wrt its oil contracts in Brasil.

Goals are one thing - reality is something else.
9 British_Kirchnerist (#) Apr 17th, 2012 - 11:49 am Report abuse
#4 Well put. The title of this article, even if a direct quote from a right wing ex-President, is ridiculous, as Uruguay would have been even more of a “prisoner” if it accepted the deal, just a prisoner of America.

#3 “about time to go back to USA on bended knee”

Thanks for the honesty, but don't think its going to happen =)
10 aussie sunshine (#) Apr 18th, 2012 - 04:32 pm Report abuse
Uruguay put distance between yourself and Argentina you will
appreciate it in the future.......
11 ynsere (#) Apr 19th, 2012 - 05:49 am Report abuse
@9 - It's hardly fair to call Sanguinetti right wing. He has always been a believer and practitioner of democracy, and his civic rights were suspended during the dictatorship. Have you ever spoken out against a dictatorship, knowing the midnight knock on the door will come?
@10 - I wish we could. But Argentine is 200 yards away, across the Uruguay river. We have no choice but to be their neighbours. Hopefully, we'll develop alternative markets and learn to rely less and less on them for our exports and tourist trade.
12 British_Kirchnerist (#) Apr 19th, 2012 - 10:25 am Report abuse
#11 Thankfully as a Brit I've never had to; if I was a British Muslim though I might have been more scared of the state ever since Blair's authoritairian premiership. No I understand this President was a democrat but that doesn't mean I have to accept his economics; Menem also was brutally represssed by the junta in the 70s and I can admire him for surviving that, but it doesn't mean he was right to, say, privatise the oil...

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!

Advertisement

Get Email News Reports!

Get our news right on your inbox.
Subscribe Now!

Advertisement