MercoPress. South Atlantic News Agency

IMF agrees voluntary conduct code for sovereign funds

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has agreed a voluntary code of conduct with sovereign wealth funds (SWF). The deal with 26 countries that run investment funds will be put to the IMF members at its October meeting.

The new guidance will cover issues like transparency, governance and accountability of these huge funds. Sovereign wealth funds control assets worth an estimated 2 to 3 trillion US dollars, which is expected to increase to around 10/12 trillion US dollars by 2012. Many rich countries including the US and Germany have expressed unease that SWF may be investing in their economies for political purposes. The largest funds are owned by Middle Eastern countries (Abu Dhabi, 800 billion US dollars; Kuwait, 200 billion), other oil producers like Norway (400 billion US dollars), and big Asian exporters like China (300 billion) and Singapore (200 billion). Some of the high-profile moves by SWF, such as the acquisition of P&O's US port operations by Dubai, have been blocked by politicians, while others, such as the investment in some of the major banking groups hit by the credit crunch, have resulted in the funds incurring substantial losses. The lack of transparency of these funds which in the past have operated in a secretive way, have exacerbated these concerns. The co-chair of the International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds (IWG), Hamad al Suwaidi, of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, said that the new deal "will promote a clearer understanding of the institutional framework, governance, and investment operations of SWF, thereby fostering trust and confidence in the international financial system". The head of Australia's sovereign wealth fund, David Murray, said there was a balance that had to be struck between full disclosure - which might make it difficult for SWF to operate in the market - and the need for public responsibility. He said that "disclosure is important but as with any other institutional investor, there must be a limit which protects the confidentiality of dealings with counterparties". Mr Murray said that by making the SWF spell out their policies on investment and risk management in detail, they would show that the funds are driven by commercial and not political concerns. However, analysts said the new voluntary rules may not fully meet Western concerns. "A voluntary set of principles and practices goes a long way to help de-mystify the methodology of sovereign wealth funds and how they invest, said Debbie Fuller of law firm Eversheds. "However, a voluntary code will not satisfy certain governments who were hoping for some form of compulsory transparency rules." Many economists believe that the world will benefit from the growth of sovereign wealth funds, which recycle the trade surpluses earned by oil producers and manufacturing exporters like China back into the world economy. The OECD has said that any moves against sovereign wealth funds would be hypocritical, since Western governments have long urged other countries to open their markets to foreign investment. It is working on a parallel code of conduct for rich countries that are on the receiving end of SWF investment. The full details of the 24 principles agreed at the two-day meeting in Santiago, Chile will not be disclosed until October. The rise of sovereign wealth funds is one sign of the shift in the balance of power in the world economy from Western industrialized countries to new emerging market giants like China and the oil-rich Middle East. How the issue is handled will be a crucial test of the way international institutions are responding to these challenges. The 26 members of the International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds are Australia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Botswana, Canada, Chile, China, Equatorial Guinea, Iran, Ireland, South Korea, Kuwait, Libya, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Qatar, Russia, Singapore, Timor-Leste, Trinidad & Tobago, the United Arab Emirates, and the United States. Oman, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, the OECD, and the World Bank, participate as permanent observers.