The Falklands Islands Government has again called on Argentina to join with them in maintaining good co-operative relations and welcomed the agreement for the forthcoming Argentine relatives’ pilgrimage to inaugurate the Falklands cemetery Darwin where their 1982 war dead are buried. The Islanders also respect the need for Argentine veterans of the war to visit the battlefields where they fought.
This was made clear by the Falklands Government Representative in London, Sukey Cameron, in an address to several hundred supporters attending the annual commemoration in London of the liberation of the Falkland Islands in June 1982. Her audience included senior Executive Council member Mike Summers, other Falkland Islanders and British veterans who fought in 1982, but a notable absentee was Baroness Margaret Thatcher, who has attended previous reunions.
Sukey Cameron’s message of reconciliation was combined with a robust defence of the Falklands “fundamental right to self-determination” as enshrined in the United Nations Charter and now incorporated in the new Falklands Constitution, under which the general election will be held in November.
Sukey Cameron was applauded when she declared: “The new Constitution recognises the reality of the modern world in which the rights of free peoples are paramount, and the assertion of territorial claims, irrespective of the wishes of those who live there, has no place”.
She continued: “The principle of self-determination has never been accepted by Argentina as applying to Falkland Islanders. So, the protest against the new Constitution from our near neighbour was predictable. But surely no-one who truly supports democracy and human rights can oppose this? We are proud of the advances that we have made in democracy and internal self government over the years. And, despite the global recession, from which we are not immune, our economy remains strong. We are determined to maintain this progress”.
While earnings from investments and a poor squid fishing season have fallen, there were many positive aspects including a developing on-shore fishing industry and record tourism by cruise ship passengers and longer term visitors, projecting a positive and welcoming image of the modern Falkland Islands.
In farming, improved quality and range of meat products are reaching overseas markets including Denmark, Sweden and Spain, as well as the United Kingdom.
High imported fuel costs have encouraged action to exploit one source of energy that is cheap, green and in plentiful supply - wind power, which has replaced twenty percent of the Power Station’s fuel consumption. And there is the exciting prospect of another round of drilling for offshore oil.
She voiced gratitude for the strong support of the British Government, Parliament, and, Armed Forces who have provided protection in war and peace.
By Harold Briley, London.
Welcome once again to our annual reception. Your support is gratifying and greatly appreciated.
This has been a roller-coaster year for the global economy, so it might be appropriate for me to begin by asking “Do you want the good news or the bad news?”! Fortunately for the Falkland Islands, there is more good news than bad.
Let me start with a success story. More people have visited the Islands over the last year than ever before. HRH the Princess Royal and her husband, Vice Admiral Timothy Laurence, graced us with a visit, en route to South Georgia. There have also been two Parliamentary delegations during the year. And on a sporting note, Falkland Cricket Club from Newbury, became the first touring team in history to visit the Islands.
Staying on the sporting theme, we are delighted that the Falklands will be represented once again at the Island Games, which take place in the Aland Islands at the end of this month. Forty eight athletes and supporters from the Islands will attend, which is something of a record in itself! The sportsmen and women have worked extremely hard to get there and we wish them the best of luck in their endeavours.
Last September, the Falkland Islands Tourist Board hosted a traditional ‘smoko’ - at Falkland House - for journalists, tour operators and the UK travel trade. Perhaps inspired by this event, and the publicity which followed, a record number of tourists visited the Islands during the last season. Land based tourism generated over three million pounds in revenues and the new inter-island ferry service has enabled visitors to cross more easily from East to West Falkland.
Cruise ship visitors increased by over twenty five percent with over 4,000 passengers landing in one day – another record. Visitors have been very complimentary, with many vowing to return. One travel journalist commented: “The Falklands could be one of the great ecotourism destinations of this century.” I congratulate the Falklands tourist industry. Not only do they contribute to the diversification of our economy; they also project a positive and welcoming image of the modern Falklands.
Our efforts to diversify our economy in other sectors are also beginning to bear fruit. Whilst the Illex fishing season has been disappointing – yes, there is some bad news! – our on-shore fishery is steadily developing, and will, one day, add to our economy. Added value is also a feature of our farming industry. Phase one of the abattoir upgrade has resulted in improved quality and range of meat products. Overseas markets now include Denmark, Sweden and Spain, as well as the UK.
The high cost of imported fossil fuels is a major disadvantage to our economy and we are taking steps to exploit one source of energy that is cheap, green and in plentiful supply - wind power. The installation of three turbines has resulted in the displacement of twenty percent of the Power Station’s annual fuel consumption.
The drive towards oil exploration has also continued. The oil operators recently met in the Islands and discussed issues related to drilling with Government officials and private sector service providers. Two companies are seeking approval for their environmental impact assessments and were able to discuss these with the community. The prospect of a second drilling round is an exciting time in our history and we are confident that robust legislation will ensure safe exploration.
Despite our progress in diversification, we have not escaped the affects of the global recession. Returns on our investments have fallen substantially and budget pressures continue to increase.
Whilst the Falklands economy remains relatively strong, we face a deficit of over seven million pounds in this financial year, principally but not exclusively due to the failure of the Illex season to which I referred earlier. This is likely to be followed by two further deficit years before recovery can be anticipated.
Some difficult choices will have to be made to achieve balanced or surplus budgets in the future. However, if we manage our public finances carefully, continue to support export development and private sector enterprise, and keep public services at affordable levels, we should be able to maintain economic growth.
Politically, this has been a significant year for the Falkland Islands. Last September we marked twenty years of attendance at the Party Conferences – which makes us one of the longest standing exhibitors. During this period we have made many valuable contacts and received loyal and unswerving support in return; symbolised by the strong message from the Prime Minister, endorsing our right of self-determination, when he met the Argentine President in March.
His message was timely, because in January this year our new Constitution came into effect. It is a ‘post-colonial’ constitution, initiated by the Falkland Islands Government, on which Falkland Islanders were fully consulted. Our first election under this Constitution will be held on 5th November.
The new Constitution recognises the reality of the modern world in which the rights of free peoples are paramount, and the assertion of territorial claims, irrespective of the wishes of those who live there, has no place. It enshrines, in the first chapter, our fundamental right to self-determination in accordance with the United Nations Charter.
However, the principle of self-determination has never been accepted by Argentina as applying to Falkland Islanders. So, the protest against the new Constitution from our near neighbour was predictable. But surely no-one who truly supports democracy and human rights can oppose this?
Let me make it clear. We want to maintain good, co-operative relations with Argentina – provided that sovereignty is not in question. Likewise we welcome visitors from Argentina and respect the need for their veterans to visit the battle sites of 1982. In this spirit, we are pleased that agreement has been reached on the way forward to allow the Argentine next of kin pilgrimage, to take place later this year to inaugurate the memorial at Darwin.
We are proud of the advances that we have made in democracy and internal self government over the years. And, despite the global recession, from which we are not immune, our economy remains strong. We are determined to maintain this progress.
The support of Her Majesty’s Government, Members of Parliament, the Armed Forces – who have protected us in war and peace – and those of you here tonight sustains us and strengthens this resolve.
I thank you all.
- Spanish version available on http://es.mercopress.com/2009/06/10/falklands-quieren-mejores-relaciones-con-argentina-pero-de-soberania-ni-hablar
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesWhile I respect and have in high value the islanders' valour, pride and all other aspects of englishness, I would point out that writing a constitution is not, by itself, a proof of being an independent state. Moreover, the islands' governmental institutions are still under the sole of their parent country which, despite what has happened along these past 176 years, cannot forget the fact that they acceded to the South Atlantic arcipelagos by forcing the Argentines out and leaving entire families behind to re-populate those territories. We can make and be friends or even enter together in joint ventures in respect of fishing, oil exploration and extraction, tourism, &c., but I'm afraid that the sovereignty issue is and will be, for all interested parties, a hard nut to crack. Perhaps a joint sovereingty might save time until a full agreement is reached. But this is, again, just wishful thinking. Cheers.
Jun 10th, 2009 - 08:46 pm 0There is no need for further debate. The Islanders have made their wishes known to the world. They want no part of a transfer of title of the Islands to Argentina. Argentina is itself a country built upon colonialism. Its colonists later broke away from Spain and declared independence. The Falkland Islanders have there own constitution and that is in itself a declaration that they do not want to be colonised by Argentina. All I ever hear in way of arguement from Argentina can be best described as sophistry. Their account of what actually happened in 1833 and prior to 1833 is also very open to question and not as cut and dried as they claim. But events of 1833 are not valid in 2009 and are at odds with the UN enshrined right to self-determination - yes I know we will hear the same attempts by argentina that self-determination doesn't apply to what they call a colony. If that is the case then, given as stated, Argentina is built on colonisation and conquest, then when will Argentina be given back to its indigenous peoples? If the events of 1833 are as described by Argentina, which they are not in truth but for the sake of argument let us say that they are, then it follows that Argentina must, by the same use of logic, give back the land it took during its genocidal Conquest of the Desert. I can already predict the responses of denial and the desperate attempts to say that it is a totally different situation. It isn't. The Falkands are not Britains to give away nor Argentina's to take. They belong to the islanders have they have made their wishes known.
Jun 11th, 2009 - 12:06 am 0It works both ways.
Chris, you are free to believe whatever you want, whatever your teachers indoctrinates you to believe in schools. You can continue to believe in axis of evil, in spread of democracy and liberty by your soldiers around the world.
Jun 11th, 2009 - 01:22 am 0Fact is that you can only compare our killings of indigenous people in southamerica with your killing of slaves which for you were a common practice. But the difference between indigenous of southamerica with the expelled of argentine settles of malvinas in 1833 is that in the first case indigenous had no nation. No nation in the world considered indigenous as people, like england didn considered slaves as humans.
But in 1833 England expelled settles from a recognized nation. A nation recognized by England itself.
About democracy in malvinas, democracy for who? for the colonizers?.
Just tell me what's your definition of colony becouse if malvinas is not a colony i wonder what is a colony?. Definitions.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!