MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, July 20th 2019 - 22:08 UTC



IMF Warns Latam “Cheap and Abundant Credit” Rises Risk of Boom-Bust Cycle

Tuesday, April 27th 2010 - 21:57 UTC
Full article
Nicolas Eyzaguirre, IMF Western Hemisphere Department Director “on guard against too much of the good thing” Nicolas Eyzaguirre, IMF Western Hemisphere Department Director “on guard against too much of the good thing”

Latin American economies as a whole are recovering nicely from the global economic downturn but “cheap and abundant external finances raise the risk of a boom-bust cycle”, said Nicolas Eyzaguirre, IMF Western Hemisphere Department Director.

Larger commodity exporting countries with access to international financial markets are benefiting strongly from rising commodity prices and easy access to international finance. Smaller commodity importers that rely heavily on remittances have a more difficult outlook.

As a result, the policy issues facing the region also vary, Nicolas Eyzaguirre said at a press conference during the IMF Spring Meetings. The larger commodity exporting countries more integrated into the world economy have to pay special attention to their policies to cope with the flood of cash from investors seeking the higher returns available in countries with good growth prospects.

Eyzaguirre cautioned that “cheap and abundant external finances raise the risk of a boom-bust cycle.” To guard against that, these countries must first allow their exchange rates to appreciate to cope with excessive international liquidity, and return their fiscal policies to a neutral stance to lean against excessive growth. They must also use macro-prudential policies to help keep their financial systems stable.

As a last resort, if these actions prove inadequate to avoid an over expansion or excessive appreciation in the exchange rate, then “carefully designed taxes on capital inflows” may have a role on a temporary basis, he said.

While most advanced economies are projected to grow slowly in coming years, the prospects for Latin America are rosier. The regional economy contracted by 1.8% in 2009, but is expected to grow by about 4% this year, perhaps even a little more.

Not only has the region emerged more quickly from the downturn than have advanced economies, but “social costs in the region were more muted,” Eyzaguirre said. In the larger Latin American economies, unemployment rose about 2 percentage points. In the United States, by contrast, unemployment rose 5.5 percentage points.

While the commodity exporting countries with broad access to international capital markets have to guard against too much of a good thing—“the strong tailwinds from the global setting” as Eyzaguirre characterized it—other economies must adopt different policies.

Commodity exporters with less access to international markets will have to fight against their past habits of spending the increased government revenues from rising prices and build more credibility in their macroeconomic policy frameworks. They need to make some structural reforms to deal with supply side issues to enhance their ability to grow. They also need to normalize their relationship with financial markets, “an endeavor where the IMF could help,” Eyzaguirre said.

Some other countries with good macroeconomic frameworks, mainly in Central America, are also commodity importers that face a slowdown in remittances from citizens living abroad. They will grow, but should manage their fiscal policies carefully, focusing attention on the poor and keeping some flexibility in reserve in case “some downside risk scenarios were to materialize,” the IMF official said.

Smaller countries that rely on tourism and remittances face a bleaker future but should resume growth next year.

Eyzaguirre said that Brazil, which has instituted a tax on foreign capital inflows, is probably the most prominent example of a country that is targeted by foreign investors seeking a high return. Brazil has to “deal with the difficulties associated with success and for being considered a very promising economy”. But he said the IMF is not critical of Brazil’s resort to a capital tax.

The IMF official also referred to Argentina’s case saying it would be very good for Argentina and for the world community if Argentina were to resume its annual economic consultations with the IMF, which it abandoned several years ago.

Eyzaguirre said that the recent global crisis showed how interdependent the world has become and how essential it is that a country knows what is going on in other countries when it develops its own policies, and that other countries know its policies.

“Economic policy dialog among nations is what the Group of 20 advanced and emerging systemic economies has called for and it is especially important that Argentina hold such consultations because it is a G-20 member”, underlined Eyzaguirre.

Categories: Economy, Latin America.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!