MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, November 5th 2024 - 10:50 UTC

 

 

Cuban regime frees leading dissident who promises to keep protesting

Saturday, March 12th 2011 - 23:04 UTC
Full article 6 comments

The Cuban government has freed one of the country's leading dissidents, but he says he will keep protesting against the government. Read full article

Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • GeoffWard

    Brazilian Ex-President Luiz Inacio (Lula) da Silva has been criticised for comments in which he compared Cuban dissidents to common criminals.

    Lula said that hunger strikes, which some dissidents have staged, were not a pretext for release. “Imagine if all the criminals in Sao Paulo went on hunger strike to demand freedom,” he said.

    Cuban dissident Guillermo Farinas, who was on hunger strike, said he felt betrayed by then-President Lula's comments. Farinas had been staging his protest for over a fortnight prior to Lula's visit, to seek the release of all the ailing political prisoners from Cuban jails.

    He began his action after jailed dissident Orlando Zapata Tamayo, who had been on hunger strike for several weeks, died in prison.
    His death provoked widespread international condemnation and calls for the release of all Cuba's detained political dissidents.

    Now, with the help of the church, the Castros think there is sufficient advantage to release nearly all political critics of their regime.

    Press hard for the release of those remaining in Cuban prisons for criticising the Castro regime.

    Mar 13th, 2011 - 08:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • aedi

    Of course the Castro's regime falls in the “bad regime” category, so if 20 “political prisoners” go into hunger strike, it would absolutely cause the ire of the ones that keep out of jail the terrorist Posada Carriles and Co. and at the same time keep filling the Guantanamo gulag with “proved terrorists” or terrorists in the making , where? in Cuba of course!
    Come on give me a break! Even a stupid can see that these people are payed by the same power to do so, in order to create another of their colorful “revolutions”. It's not that the empire hasn't tried over 50 years to bring this particular “ bad regime” to its knees, they employed ALL the tricks the CIA and the Pentagon can muster, with the help of their European suckers of course, without making a single dent on a poor but determined county's right to become independent from the rapacious empire.
    By the way, haven't this “poor victim” refused to be freed before? Or was another well paid “hero”
    That of course wouldn't fit the picture, eh? Imagine the western vassal media's publishing it!
    “POLITICAL PRISONER IN CUBA REFUSES TO BE FREED”, that would say a lot, wouldn't it?

    Mar 14th, 2011 - 12:33 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • GeoffWard

    Aedi, I realise that English is not your native language, but I am having difficulty following your logic.

    As I understand it, the USA have taken in a million or more (?) refugees from (the Communist Dictatorship) Cuba.

    My criticism was of my erstwhile President.
    Lula da Silva became a pariah in his own land by failing to give recognition to the voice of the common man, in Cuba, in Venezuela and in Iran.
    Though he enjoyed great support from the unwashed/uneducated, he betrayed the very roots and philosophy of the people who voted for him - the common man and woman of the country he served through The Workers Party (P.T.).

    Lula agreed with these ('bad') dictators that
    (i) they had the right to stone women to death,
    (ii) to remove free speech and
    (iii) to imprison those disagreeing with the dictator.

    That made Lula the wrong man to 'rule' Brasil, and I am thankful he is gone.

    Mar 14th, 2011 - 01:58 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Think

    (3)
    You say:
    “Though he enjoyed great support from the unwashed/uneducated”

    I say:
    Confirms my opinion about you. What a Turnip!

    Mar 14th, 2011 - 07:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • GeoffWard

    Think (#4),
    the expression alludes to classic literature and reference to 'the common man'.
    However (and as you know), with 75%+ in Brasil with just basic primary education (or less), the support-base for Lula's PT was disproportionally from the 'less-educated, common man' - or, if you prefer - the politically unsophisticated, who will willingly vote an illiterate clown into Senate.

    Btw: 'What's the difference between a turnip and a swede?' :-)

    Mar 15th, 2011 - 01:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • aedi

    It's a shame that Merco Press chose not to publish my comments in this and other article. Where is that so vaunted freedom of speech ?

    Mar 16th, 2011 - 12:24 am - Link - Report abuse 0

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!