MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, May 10th 2024 - 14:49 UTC

 

 

Turkey slams Argentine Judge ruling blaming Ottomans for Armenian genocide

Wednesday, April 13th 2011 - 04:44 UTC
Full article 7 comments

Turkey has slammed an Argentine judge's ruling that it committed genocide against Armenians around the time of World War I. The Turkish Foreign Affairs Ministry said the ruling was an example of how legal systems are abused by extreme nationalists belonging to the Armenian Diaspora. Read full article

Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Realwarfare

    How can you solve like these horrible crimes? Get a degree in Criminal Justice from “United Forensic College” search online.

    Apr 13th, 2011 - 05:27 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • geo

    I think and guess that Armenians like ' Pino ' in Argentina !

    Apr 13th, 2011 - 09:59 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Be serious

    Pot calling the kettle black perhaps?

    Apr 13th, 2011 - 11:17 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • geo

    I just remembered...
    Armenians like to eat pizza more than Italians in Argentina !

    Apr 13th, 2011 - 01:19 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • zubeyde

    Many Reputable Scholars Challenge The Conventional, One-Sided Anti-Turkish Narrative And / Or Refrain From Alleging The Crime Of Genocide
    http://armenians-1915.blogspot.com/2009/06/2889-ottoman-armenian-tragedy-is.html

    These Are Their Words

    Background – War And Imperial Collapse

    The collapse of the Ottoman Empire dramatically rearranged the map of a vast region. What was once a sprawling, multi-ethnic empire splintered into more than two-dozen new nations, from the Balkans to the Caucasus to the Arabian peninsula. Across the surface of these lands unfolded a profound human tragedy. Nearly incessant war crippled the Ottoman economy. It left towns devoid of men to care for households or to tend crops. Military requisitions drained the countryside of livestock and many of the labor-saving implements of daily life. Disease ran rampant and famine struck many.

    Vast Population Movements

    As new states coalesced, large population masses streamed across the landscape, some fleeing the path of war, some seeking new lives among ethnic brethren or co-religionists, some having suffered expulsion, and some obeying negotiated population exchanges. Two such major movements were (a) the flight of Muslim refugees from newly-established Christian states in Balkans and the Caucasus into what would become modern Turkey during the period roughly between 1821 and 1922, and (b) the relocation of much of the Ottoman Armenian population from the war zone of eastern Anatolia into Ottoman domains in Syria, mainly in 1915-16.

    A Genuine Historic Controversy

    History records the enormous human suffering from both of these events: Perhaps 5.5 million Muslims, mostly Turks, died as refugees or were killed in the years immediately preceding and during World War I, as well as through the formative years of the Republic of Turkey. And certainly hundreds of thousands of Armenians died during the Armenian Revolt and the relocations consequently ordered by the Ottoman government. Scholars on the Ott

    Apr 13th, 2011 - 07:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • jerry

    The reason CFK´s judge made this release is because there are a lot of Armenian votes in Argentina, and remember, it is an election year.

    Apr 13th, 2011 - 11:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • zubeyde

    Thus, whether the tragic suffering of the Ottoman Armenians meets the definition of the crime of genocide as provided by the . . .See Appendix 1 . . . United Nations Genocide Convention . . . Appendix 1 remains a genuine historic controversy. Moreover, the notion that the one-sided Armenian narrative is settled history must be utterly rejected so that researchers will feel free to delve into the details of these contested events.

    4) Questions Considered

    Among the work of the scholars below, many of whom are Ottoman history experts, are considerations of the following questions:

    * Is the genocide label, which is so vigorously promoted by Armenian advocacy organizations appropriate?

    * Did the Ottoman government during World War I possess the requisite intent described by the U.N. Genocide Convention, to destroy the Armenians?

    * What was the Armenian * Revolt . . . See Appendix 2 . . . Armenian Revolt . . . Appendix 2 and how did it impact the Ottoman government’s decision to relocate Armenian civilians from eastern Anatolia?

    * What was the ultimate toll upon the Armenian population? And how many deaths could be attributed to the various causes: intercommunal warfare, starvation, exposure, massacre, disease, etc.?

    * What was the ultimate toll upon the Ottoman Muslim population embroiled in these same events? And how many deaths can be attributed to the same causes?

    Their work establishes a better basis upon which to address historic grievances than the one-sided narrative most often provided in media accounts and by Armenian lobbyists and their advocates. In effect, these scholars provide the oft-ignored historical context, which is critical to any explanation of the shared past of the Turkish and Armenian peoples.

    At a minimum, the list below demonstrates that in fact, there exists no common agreement that the genocide label is appropriate and that, contrary to assertions made by Armenian lobby groups, the details of the historic narrative remain open to fur

    Apr 14th, 2011 - 03:19 am - Link - Report abuse 0

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!