Rising international food prices could trigger an acceleration of inflation in several countries in Latin America and the Caribbean this year, highlighting the need for policies to protect the urban poor, according to a new study by the Inter-American Development Bank, (IDB).
Net food importers with a greater share of spending concentrated on tradable foodstuffs and with little room to let their currency appreciate will be the hardest hit by higher international food prices, according to the study. The urban poor that do not have access to any enhanced income from self-grown products are most at risk from the food price shock.
“There is a need to increase and improve targeting of aid, perhaps through reformed conditional cash transfer schemes, to these groups to compensate the effect of the food price surge,” according to the Policy Note published by the IDB’s Research Department. “How will the food price shock affect inflation in Latin America and the Caribbean.”
Flexible exchange rates in other countries tend to offset the impact on domestic prices but this raises other concerns. A significant nominal appreciation may affect the competitiveness of other tradable sectors. The challenge for net commodity exporters is to harness the current windfall and ensure that the economy remains competitive.
The report estimates the potential inflationary impact of higher international food and oil prices for 13 countries in the region and discusses policies that can be used to alleviate the impact of higher food prices on inflation. The study concludes that rising oil prices will only significantly affect inflation in a small number of countries in the region this year.
The report concludes that due to the food price surge, increases in inflation could exceed 5 percentage points in Bolivia, Dominican Republic, Guatemala and Honduras unless additional policy actions are taken.
In some countries with flexible exchange rate systems, such as Brazil, Colombia and Mexico, currencies tend to appreciate as a response to higher food prices and as a result the impact on domestic prices is muted. However, there is no simple pattern of differences between floaters and fixers; the speed and extent of pass-through is quite heterogeneous and dependent on factors such as the importance of food in the overall inflation index and local policy measure
The thirteen countries involved in the report are Bahamas, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Peru and Uruguay.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesI view this food issue simplitically (over-simplistically?).
May 09th, 2011 - 01:54 pm 0If too much food is exported - or too little is produced or imported - this means insufficient for home markets.
Prices at home go up, people can't afford the new prices, leading to hunger/starvation and 'disturbances' in the streets.
Is it not the primary duty of a Government to ensure that staple foods *at the 'right' price* are available to people in all parts of the nation at all times?
This is possible if there is a minimum of sophistication in food export trade agreements, if there is an infrastructure for internal food distributions and if there is a political will to distribute foodstocks equitably - both in the cities and in the sertão.
There will always be rich and poor parts/nations of Latin America, but governments across these two continents can come together via Unasur, etc, to address food/trade relationships *with this anti-starvation provision in mind*.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!