The British government congratulated Argentine President Cristina Fernandez on her re-election and historic victory in Sunday’s polls but it also insisted that the sovereignty of the Falklands is “not negotiable”. Read full article
The Exodus Continues in the British colonial government of Malvinas
THE Governor has accepted, “with regret” the resignation of Emma Edwards from the Legislative Assembly.
In her letter of resignation, Emma Edwards wrote:
“As I now know I will be leaving the Islands in August 2012”
TWIMC
The above Article says that the Foreign Office declared:
Quote
”On the issue of the Falklands (Malvinas) we obviously value are ample relation with Argentina but we do not want any issue related to the Falklands dominates our bilateral relations”.added the Foreign Office.
Unquote
Quite a lot of grammatical mistakes in a document from the FCO !
Either somebody has fiddled with that text or Brtiton is working for the FCO :-)
(1) Marcos Alejandro......
Emma Edwards is leaving Malvinas???
This means that she's not Isolde!!!
Isolde would never leave :-)
The British government states
Anyhow our position on the Falklands is well known, there will be no sovereignty negotiations until the Islanders so wish.
And went on to state how the British and Argentina can be great friends and trading partners,
Helping each other after all that’s what friends are for .
But alas the reply will be vicious insults and envy,
It really shows how the educated gentlemen, tries to help the indoctrinated ruffian, and gets insulted,
But as a civilised country we will continue to try to help these poor unfortunate people,
Even if they are very ungrateful and selfish , and very childish, at the help we try to give,
An interesting thought .
,
Sounds like an appropriate and mature responce from the UK gvt. I suppose CFK would rather tweet pirates forever in responce. Looks like integrity is a lost art in Argentina; so is taking any actions to back up ones words. He he!
Really? Marcos could unmask himself from the paper bag his parents put over his head.
If your issue is with the use of c rather than s the I suggest you look at the OED. You will see there is nothing wrong with the form of the word I chose to use.
Pronunciation: Brit. /rᵻˈspɒns/ , U.S. /rəˈspɑns/ , /riˈspɑns/
Forms: ME respouns, ME respounse, ME–15 respons, ME–16 responce, ME– response;
10 so_far your childish remarks do little to help your intelligence
Thinking abt it, your remarks show similarities to the poodle following its master.
Childish insults go right over my head, so does indoctrinated innuendoes
Quite a lot of grammatical mistakes in a document from the FCO !
Tut tut
This is obviously a translation error by merco-press
And not the FCO .
Another British turnip that has to correct the teacher [Again]
so-far. So when you decide to pull someone up on what you believe to be a spelling error you decide to ignore the Oxford English Dictionary and go to some random word related website. I suppose this is acceptable referencing when submitting work towards a degree in an Argentine university?
This is clear evidence of the poor level of education in your country.
If the OED says that a spelling is correct then it is correct. You disagree?
Again, another Argie who is incapable of doing his own research, or one who cannot admit that he is wrong. Looks like Marcos and so_far are related. He he.
Beef, right again. Appears to be a bit of a theme on here.
A special person? Don't know about that but I know how to refer to the Oxford English Dictionary and clearly you don't. It is not that hard, so perhaps the one with intellectual challenges isn't me?
Not special but simply correct. Are you not man enough to admit that the OED is correct and you are wrong? Pathetic.
Think - go to the OED yourself and write response/responce into the search section. You will see that the result is as I posted earlier (@14), which indicates there is more than one accepted way to spell the word. This is free as you only pay for enhanced access.
I can do it again for you if you wish? It will simply indicate you have chose the wrong side of the argument Think.
18 Think
Normally, I do not comment on experts who think clever
.....
I ask?:
An error in the translation from English to..................................... English?
unless you have seen the original transcript, then may I suggest you chuckle to your self,
Again I think it is a translation error,
Copied from one version to another
We both know very well errors are made,
Even by you,
Chuckle chuckle [not]
.
10 so_far Hahahaha
Yes, I remember I made this comment a few weeks ago:
23-Beef, My English is terrible, however is not my native language and I speak four.The one who needs to get back to your books is you Mr PhD.
Beef said “I ma not unemployed so am one of those fortunate ones” Que dites-vous?
He always blame the batteries on his keyboard, he needs to change his brain batteries as well.
She knows that the Falklands sovereignty is not negotiable, she will keep barking at the moon for four years. If you ask the people that voted Cristina why they did it, they will tell you because she imprisoned Videla, because she gave them netbooks, because she is fighting to recover the Malvinas, because she gives them money as long as they keep making babies, because she cries everytime she remembers him(aka Néstor Kirchner).
29 Forgetit87
Brazilian neighbour, I am not that young nor a scholar nor a rocket scientist(obviously)I am a gaucho with an internet connection :-)
Like Borges used to say: I am fluent with great ignorance in several languages.
Ingles, Italiano, Espanhol e um pouco de frances e portugues, o ultimo graças aos meus primos no Brasil.(Piedade, Rio de Janeiro)
tchau
Sorry to burst your bubble, Marcos, but no, l am not Emma Edwards.
Think, spelling is changing from generation to generation. lt does not matter that much as long as we understand each other.
And you DO understand, don't you, that the Falklands are NOT part of Argentina?
Are you guys actually arguing about spelling...? Guys, come on, that is a new low!
Think, I am yet to see your reaction to the link I posted. Has it shut you up and opened your eyes or have you failed to look at it? I am sure it’s the latter, because you are incapable to realising the truth.
How was my spelling? I checked it to make sure its okay, I would hate for someone to criticise my spelling. That would really hurt and humiliate me......
33 lsolde
Sorry to burst your bubble, Marcos, but no, l am not Emma Edwards
Que nena?
Señorita, please read comment#2 Mr Think wrote:
1) Marcos Alejandro......
Emma Edwards is leaving Malvinas???
This means that she's not Isolde!!!
Isolde would never leave :-)
You wont here from THINK again,
Not on this blogg, him and so-far, think its funny to insult people spelling, and love correcting others, but fail to realise their total stupidity,
Think very rarely talks to me, [thank got]
He thinks he is clever and a teacher of others,
But in reality think is ignorant, and indoctrinated, I used to have respect, but not for years now,
He give only answers to insinuate to others they are bad and he is clever, he gives half truths
And anti British rhetoric, and cajoles with fools like so-far, and others to intimidate,
Then refuses point black to return people questions or replies, if it proves him wrong,
He does not seem a rude man, but an encourager, of others
He calls brits, turnips, to belittle us, sadly he is a great wannaby,
He seeks what he can never truly except [THE TRUTH]
OH THINK
YOU ARE A PLONKER,
A new name for you.
Just a thought.,
what can I say? por 4 años más de crecimiento, dialogo, justicia, unión entre los argentinos y siempre mirando hacia el futuro!.... I'm being sarcastic, obviously ! :-)
briton, I dont ever expect for Think to respond to the evidence that I have provided that categorically proves that his assumptions and accusations are completely incorrect.
Thanks for the information…..Just a short comment about it:
1) It doesn’t inform anything about Mount Pleasant Airport.
2) It doesn’t inform anything about the importance of the 2,000 troops + 600 civilian personal for the economy of Malvinas.
3) About the hospital……:
A) It was the British Government that constructed that fine hospital, at a very high cost, after you Islanders burnt the old one in one of your famous drinking berserk runs. You Islanders have not and are not amortizating that “Expense” = Subsidy.
B) The MOD “reimburses” you 1.2 million £ a year. As I understand, the FIG(leaf) has a reciprocity agreement with the NHS by which you Islanders don’t pay for treatment in the UK. But British soldiers have to pay you? = Subsidy
C) As I understand, until recently, 2 GP’s, 1 Anesthetist and an undisclosed number of nurses where paid directly by the MOD = Subsidy.
And your 'reciprocity' argument is complete bx. If there were 6o million islanders staying in the UK at any time, doubling the call for emergency surgical care, you might have a point, but actually, you don't. Anything that the UK government pays to FIG is to make sure the hospital has enough capacity for their contingency planning. And if that means that some of the hospital staff are less than busy some of the time, then that's up to them.So no, not a subsidy.
If you find out that the MOD are paying for midwives and dentists, I might start listening. They don't pay for GPs as they have their own, and and 'undisclosed number of nurses'?? if it's undisclosed, where did you get that from? They have to have some of their own medical and paramedic staff for search and rescue.
In the meantime, why don't you remind us all what precisely this has to do with you.
You say:
”No, Think, British 'soldiers' don't pay anything.”
I say:
Right, Monty, British taxpayers are paying the bills…..
(51) Islander1
Noted and understood…..........................
I retract my comment about the origin of the hospital fire.
But you have to admit that you people, occasionally, fancy a drink,… or two……
OK, Marcos, it was Think who said that.
l made a mistake.
Big deal over such a trifle. What do you want me to do?, Grovel?
Think, as regards the hospital & the finances, so what?
What has that got to do with you?
And why are you so interested?
Haven't you got more interesting things to do?
Are your Collies trained with sheep? lf not, you could have many a fruitful hour training them.
Ah Think, what lovely theories you have come up with. It is funny that they are a watered down version of what you were peddling before. I accept that as a minor victory on my part. Before you said MOD funded 75% of the Hospital, but now only £1.2m, and that is for services provided to the MOD by the hospital. How can the hospital give away it precious services and expertise to an organisation for free!?
Also, look on page 148 of the document I provided you, or what Adobe calls page 153, and you will see a payment by FIG to MOD labelled Air Terminal....
The document I provided you is the FIG budget, with actual revenues and expenditures from the previous year, it is how FIG funds itself and its departments. If you want an economic viewpoint on the influence of the MOD in the Falklands economy, I suggest you ask someone in the FIG Policy Unit. But from my recollection of their work, MOD's contribution to local businesses isn’t that much...The Globe may live off of it, but other than that, not much. If you have actually visited the Falklands, you will see that the military only really venture into Stanley on the weekends, and their only contribution is in the pubs, where they usually cost more (damage to property) than they actually pay for, as their food and accommodation is provided by the military. And they don’t come in every weekend. But that is what I call local knowledge, which trumps your assumptions based on what you hope is reality hundreds of miles away.
The crap about the nurses etc. being paid by the MOD, rubbish! Don’t always listen to rumours Think ;-) You try and portray yourself as smarter than that, but it is good to see you clutching at straws.
The UK did provide a lot of funding after the war for infrastructure, this is what made us self-sufficient, after years of neglect that led to the aggressive invasion of Argentine forces. Now with Fisheries and Tourism, and in the future hopefully Oil, we are self-sufficient.
53 lsolde OK, Marcos, it was Think who said that.
l made a mistake
Not to worry Isolde, we are humans and you are British on top of that.
Repeat after me M a l v i n a s A r g e n t in a s
Got it?
Good girl!
Less vodka and more creamy coffee. :-)
#60 yes....i remember others British in the past said the same in:
Egypt
India
America
Asia
Hong Kong
Singapure
etc. etc
All them have something in common.....they were wrong.
Is all matter of time dear kid....Malvinas Argentinas, understand that once for all, you´re there ONLY by force....international comunnity knows perfectly that.
61 so_far
Again like think
You are so wrong,
The countries you mention, were given their independence, were they not, so they are now and forever out of the equation,
Those that are left, were offered their independence, and by their own free will have decided to remain British, that is not empire, that is freedom of choice,
The Falklands and Belize, as an example, want independence, but their very greedy and aggressive neighbours keep on attacking or threatening them, so British forces have to remain to protect them,
Until such time as they grow up and stop acting like spoilt children and let them live in peace,
As for
Think
Does it really matter if Britain subsidises people or places, does it really matter,
Who does Argentina subsidise, what about your illegal colony in the Antarctica, does not Argentina pay for things for them,
What Britain pays and what it does not, is British business, and who Argentina subsidises is hers,
Why all the slugging of,
Just a thought. .
@59 so_far,
Thats it, comrade. Mess with us & you'll walk the plank. Got it?
A matter of time, eh? You don't have that time. Probably Brazil will invade Argentina long, long before you ever can invade us again.
@57 Marcos,
ln your dreams señor. The Falklands belong to the Falklanders, next in line would be the British. No-one else is on the list.
You have listed a group of nations that all gained independence....they got what they wanted, just like the people of the Falklands have and will always have.
Tell me...how am I here by force? I was born here, as was my father and his father, and his father, and his father and his father and his father. How many generations do you go back in Argentina?
The arrogance of Argentines is something that always confuses me. Argentina as a country has never accomplished anything. A country with a murky past that involves dictatorships, assisting war criminals, assisting the Nazis, economic incompetence, exterminating its own people, murdering its own people, never winning a war, spreading lies across the world, celebrates terrorism, invading and imposing itself on a small island community, and trying to ensure 3000 people do not have human rights to achieve their imperialist ambitions, partnering up with currently the most dangerous states in the world, and the gullibility and naivety of a child. Yes, what a proud and mighty nation you are. You claim to be a democracy…laughable. Yes, your Plastic President trying to change the laws to allow successive stints in charge, that will change to needing an election every decade or so. Argentina will takeover Chavez’s mantle as the rogue and oppressive nation in South America.
you said...Is all matter of time dear kid...Malvinas Argentinas, understand that once for all, you´re there ONLY by force....international comunnity knows perfectly that.
I say, the international community doesnt suport you, you tag on your claim to unrelated agreements and organisation which other nations have no choice but to accept. How is this support? None of these countries have actually done anything of substance to support your claim.
So it is only a matter of time for Argentina to colonise the Falklands? If that happens we will just become independent with the use of self-determination, as afforded to all people by the UN.
# 67
The only part that make sense and deserve an answer....
So it is only a matter of time for Argentina to colonise the Falklands? If that happens we will just become independent with the use of self-determination, as afforded to all people by the UN.
Yes boy, you right there, you could become independient anytime you wish BUT....from Argentina the real and legal owner of Malvinas, its.up to you people make the things properly. Now in the eyes of international community you lot are only SQUATTERS and a vil tool from UK for keep this madness in an stable and pacefully region.
None of your reply deserves a response because it is riddled with lies and factual inaccuracies.
The real owners of the Falkland Islands are the people who were born there and the people who live there and make the Falklands what is it. Not some arrogant Argentine who lives hundreds of miles away, who has no intention ever visiting the place in question or any desire to live there. Your attitude sickens me and your arrogance is laughable.
Argentina are the only ones threatening peace in South America, we are just trying to live our lives the best we can. Argentina is the only country trying to disrupt things. Britain has nothing to do with it. They only protect us because you disrupted the peace 29 years ago. Argentina is the only country in this region that has a history of disrupting the peace.
You consider the real owners of the Falklands squatters, and I call you imperialists. The only important factor is that the people of the Falklands has the right to choose, provided by the UN.
Also, you didnt explain how I am forced to live here?
a dictatorship that pretends to be a democracy
a goverment that lies to its own people,
but as you can only talk, then whats your problem,
your already showing the world how good you are at talking,
laugh laugh.
thr falklands are british,
a dictatorship that pretends to be a democracy
a goverment that lies to its own people,
but as you can only talk, then ,really britton??/I think is a full fledge democracy in Argentina....You do not like it? go away! We do not need you!
laugh laugh.
thr falklands are british” relaly? For how long???
AHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!
@ 69M_of_FI,
Don't take any notice of fools like so_far, l think he's an implanted Croatian immigrant anyway. He's never come up with anything worthwhile. Just repeats the Argentine whine.
@71Malvinero1,
Whats the matter malvin, keyboard stuck like that silly malen's?
Another implanted immigrant, this time from ltaly.
Then of course we have dear old Think, 1st generation Argentine from Sweden.
Well, M_of_FI, their cheek is astounding considering you are 6th or 7th generation. Grasping scumbags, the whole shower of them.
Whats the matter malvin, keyboard stuck like that silly malen's?
Another implanted immigrant, this time from ltaly.
Then of course we have dear old Think, 1st generation
I prefer to live in Argentina,than bankrupt ,criminal uk...
We should get rid of all the immigrants, too many Paraguayans, Peruvians and Bolivians, etc they are criminals. But most importantly we need to cleanse the country of anglos. There are too many anglos pose as Argentine. They will never be, they are traitors all of them colonials, they are all agents of the crown of England.
I do not care for the rights of any immigrants, including the pirates on las malvinas. Their history is no valid, we have created a new history.
It is proud loyal patriots to their nation like Think and James Peck we must look to, to show the way for all other national patriots. The people of las Malvinas can be reborn Argentine like James Peck whose father was a traitor to Argentina and a war hero of the British. He should have been hung for his crimes, if we had won he would have been disapeared but lucky his son has come right and now is a central to our propaganda war.
Well you wanted CFK and you got her, now what's that old saying arrrrr yes Be careful what you wish for, as you just may get it, well CFK that is but never the Falklands.
(72) Isolde
Then of course we have dear old Think, 1st generation Argentine from Sweden.
Sweden???..............
Bloody Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeden???
Do I look like a Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeede???
Do I sound like a Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeede???
71 Malvinero1
thruth hurts does it not.
your goverments full of B/S
even today to indocrinated unhinged mouth piece open up his river again to sprout crap, and you indocrinated bloggers all worship them,
dont say for your goverment
and even less for her indocrinated bloggers,
laugh laugh.
@78 Artillero601,
Pom or Pommy. Originally from Australia & means Englishman.
Can be an insult & can be a term of affection. lt just depends on the context & tone of voice.
Some English don't like it but a lot don't care or find it funny.
l have been called a Pom by experts, so what Think says doesn't worry me. He is a Swedish amateur. Only teasing, he says that he is not Swedish.
There are arguements as to its original meaning.
1) As you said, prisoner of his/her majesty. POHM
2)Prisoner of Mother England, POME
3)Rhymes with Emigrant, Pomegranate(the fruit), shortened to POM.
No doubt others.
@77 Think,
Your keyboard stuck too, Cher Think? You'll have to stop buying those cheap Chinese computers as will malen & malvinero1.
Don't you like the Swedes either, Cher Think? l've only met about half a dozen of them & l liked the ones l met.
Been to Australia a few times. It's mostly a nice nickname they have for us. The Aussies have very much the same sense of humor we do unlike the Americans to be honest. It's a very insulty-jokey relationship. Quite like in the UK.
But yeah. It means a British person. I was told it's because of the accent the posh British people speak in. Plumb in mouth and all that.
On the basis of the British invasion of Río de la Plata I have been able to establish that Argentina is in fact owned by Great Britain.
I have been tabling a series of motions at the UN in order to officially establish this claim to Argentina. There is historical president for this, on the basis of an almost 200 year invasion of the Falkland Islands by a German and some British ex patriots, Argentina claims the Falkland Islands.
I can establish as historical fact that Río de la Plata was invaded by Britain and that this claim was never renounced, there is over 200 years of continued British claim to Argentina.
This makes all Argentines suject to British law and taxation. I am planning to get Buenos Aires renamed Port of Britain. Argentina will be called Bairdland, after the leader of British forces in the first occupation of Río de la Plata.
It is important to state that this did not happen just once - as in the Argentine claim to the Falklands....... but twice!
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesCristina Kirchner re-elected as Argentina's president in landslide
Oct 24th, 2011 - 04:05 pm - Link - Report abuse 0www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/24/cristina-kirchner-win-argentina-
elections?newsfeed=true
The Exodus Continues in the British colonial government of Malvinas
THE Governor has accepted, “with regret” the resignation of Emma Edwards from the Legislative Assembly.
In her letter of resignation, Emma Edwards wrote:
“As I now know I will be leaving the Islands in August 2012”
TWIMC
Oct 24th, 2011 - 04:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The above Article says that the Foreign Office declared:
Quote
”On the issue of the Falklands (Malvinas) we obviously value are ample relation with Argentina but we do not want any issue related to the Falklands dominates our bilateral relations”.added the Foreign Office.
Unquote
Quite a lot of grammatical mistakes in a document from the FCO !
Either somebody has fiddled with that text or Brtiton is working for the FCO :-)
(1) Marcos Alejandro......
Emma Edwards is leaving Malvinas???
This means that she's not Isolde!!!
Isolde would never leave :-)
The British government states
Oct 24th, 2011 - 04:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Anyhow our position on the Falklands is well known, there will be no sovereignty negotiations until the Islanders so wish.
And went on to state how the British and Argentina can be great friends and trading partners,
Helping each other after all that’s what friends are for .
But alas the reply will be vicious insults and envy,
It really shows how the educated gentlemen, tries to help the indoctrinated ruffian, and gets insulted,
But as a civilised country we will continue to try to help these poor unfortunate people,
Even if they are very ungrateful and selfish , and very childish, at the help we try to give,
An interesting thought .
,
@2
Oct 24th, 2011 - 04:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Are you an English grammar teacher or what?
And [WTF] text or Brtiton is working for the FCO
Oct 24th, 2011 - 04:30 pm - Link - Report abuse 0briton-britain- britton
teacher-informer
fink-think-thinking
?? lol
I always
Oct 24th, 2011 - 04:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0thought that briton
wrote from a
blackbery
with
broken [[]][]
display [[[][][[
and without [[][[][
autocorrection feature [[[]]][][]
:)
so-far so good []
Oct 24th, 2011 - 04:55 pm - Link - Report abuse 0but no cigar][]
(6) So_far
Oct 24th, 2011 - 05:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0;-)
Sounds like an appropriate and mature responce from the UK gvt. I suppose CFK would rather tweet pirates forever in responce. Looks like integrity is a lost art in Argentina; so is taking any actions to back up ones words. He he!
Oct 24th, 2011 - 05:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0#8 Think
Oct 24th, 2011 - 05:35 pm - Link - Report abuse 0well, talking about our friend briton...look this Dr Beef and his responce......maybe both work at FCO ?? (#9)
Marcos already unmasked this Dr
:D
lol
Oct 24th, 2011 - 05:42 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Comment removed by the editor.
Oct 24th, 2011 - 05:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0My gosh that is one ugly family....wonder where the other homely kid is, still in school in NYC?
Oct 24th, 2011 - 06:39 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Really? Marcos could unmask himself from the paper bag his parents put over his head.
Oct 24th, 2011 - 06:48 pm - Link - Report abuse 0If your issue is with the use of c rather than s the I suggest you look at the OED. You will see there is nothing wrong with the form of the word I chose to use.
Pronunciation: Brit. /rᵻˈspɒns/ , U.S. /rəˈspɑns/ , /riˈspɑns/
Forms: ME respouns, ME respounse, ME–15 respons, ME–16 responce, ME– response;
Try harder next time!
10 so_far your childish remarks do little to help your intelligence
Oct 24th, 2011 - 07:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Thinking abt it, your remarks show similarities to the poodle following its master.
Childish insults go right over my head, so does indoctrinated innuendoes
So, so far, not so good then, lol
#14
Oct 24th, 2011 - 07:20 pm - Link - Report abuse 0http://www.dumbtionary.com/word/responce.shtml
:)
Quite a lot of grammatical mistakes in a document from the FCO !
Oct 24th, 2011 - 07:43 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Tut tut
This is obviously a translation error by merco-press
And not the FCO .
Another British turnip that has to correct the teacher [Again]
No more apples for this teacher lol
,
Normally, I do not comment Br-tit-on's turnipidities.....
Oct 24th, 2011 - 08:09 pm - Link - Report abuse 0But this one is just too good to let it pass...........
He says:
This is obviously a translation error by merco-press
I ask?:
An error in the translation from English to..................................... English?
Chuckle chuckle®
so-far. So when you decide to pull someone up on what you believe to be a spelling error you decide to ignore the Oxford English Dictionary and go to some random word related website. I suppose this is acceptable referencing when submitting work towards a degree in an Argentine university?
Oct 24th, 2011 - 08:12 pm - Link - Report abuse 0This is clear evidence of the poor level of education in your country.
If the OED says that a spelling is correct then it is correct. You disagree?
Again, another Argie who is incapable of doing his own research, or one who cannot admit that he is wrong. Looks like Marcos and so_far are related. He he.
Beef, right again. Appears to be a bit of a theme on here.
Mr Beef,
Oct 24th, 2011 - 08:35 pm - Link - Report abuse 0I write very bad english, but I think everyone here know perfectly well how to write response, i think is clear enough Dr.
I begin to understand why Marcos has fun with you .... you're a special person :)
A special person? Don't know about that but I know how to refer to the Oxford English Dictionary and clearly you don't. It is not that hard, so perhaps the one with intellectual challenges isn't me?
Oct 24th, 2011 - 08:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Not special but simply correct. Are you not man enough to admit that the OED is correct and you are wrong? Pathetic.
(20) so_far
Oct 24th, 2011 - 09:27 pm - Link - Report abuse 0As Mr. Beef surely knows, the Oxford English Dictionary is a paying site…………………
But her are some equally valid free access ones:
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/spellcheck/british/?q=responce
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/spellcheck/british/?q=responce
(This one is run by Oxford University Press; same company that runs the OED)
As we all can see; response is spelled with an “S” ; not with a “C”…………..
Sorry Mr. Beef……. You are wrong.... Again.
Mr special Beef, check yourself in OED on line site if your responce word is correct or not.
Oct 24th, 2011 - 09:30 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Please.....
http://english.oxforddictionaries.com/
Think - go to the OED yourself and write response/responce into the search section. You will see that the result is as I posted earlier (@14), which indicates there is more than one accepted way to spell the word. This is free as you only pay for enhanced access.
Oct 24th, 2011 - 09:34 pm - Link - Report abuse 0I can do it again for you if you wish? It will simply indicate you have chose the wrong side of the argument Think.
Give up Mr. Beef....
Oct 24th, 2011 - 09:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Oxford AND Cambridge are against you.
Not good odds at all.
18 Think
Oct 24th, 2011 - 10:09 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Normally, I do not comment on experts who think clever
.....
I ask?:
An error in the translation from English to..................................... English?
unless you have seen the original transcript, then may I suggest you chuckle to your self,
Again I think it is a translation error,
Copied from one version to another
We both know very well errors are made,
Even by you,
Chuckle chuckle [not]
.
10 so_far Hahahaha
Oct 24th, 2011 - 11:05 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Yes, I remember I made this comment a few weeks ago:
23-Beef, My English is terrible, however is not my native language and I speak four.The one who needs to get back to your books is you Mr PhD.
Beef said “I ma not unemployed so am one of those fortunate ones” Que dites-vous?
He always blame the batteries on his keyboard, he needs to change his brain batteries as well.
http://en.mercopress.com/2011/10/12/falklands-desire-petroleum-and-rockhopper-reach-farm-out-agreement-and-on-new-drillings
What happen Beef?
Having a hard time to digest Cristina landslide victory? :-)))
She knows that the Falklands sovereignty is not negotiable, she will keep barking at the moon for four years. If you ask the people that voted Cristina why they did it, they will tell you because she imprisoned Videla, because she gave them netbooks, because she is fighting to recover the Malvinas, because she gives them money as long as they keep making babies, because she cries everytime she remembers him(aka Néstor Kirchner).
Oct 24th, 2011 - 11:34 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Comment removed by the editor.
Oct 25th, 2011 - 12:01 am - Link - Report abuse 0Well there goes the theory that Latino women have all the looks.
Oct 25th, 2011 - 12:55 am - Link - Report abuse 0That has got to be the ugliest woman I have ever seen. But is it a woman?
29 Forgetit87
Oct 25th, 2011 - 01:40 am - Link - Report abuse 0Brazilian neighbour, I am not that young nor a scholar nor a rocket scientist(obviously)I am a gaucho with an internet connection :-)
Like Borges used to say: I am fluent with great ignorance in several languages.
Ingles, Italiano, Espanhol e um pouco de frances e portugues, o ultimo graças aos meus primos no Brasil.(Piedade, Rio de Janeiro)
tchau
@4
Oct 25th, 2011 - 06:54 am - Link - Report abuse 0How would you even know what one of those is, Arsolero?
Daddy still helping you?
Sorry to burst your bubble, Marcos, but no, l am not Emma Edwards.
Oct 25th, 2011 - 10:01 am - Link - Report abuse 0Think, spelling is changing from generation to generation. lt does not matter that much as long as we understand each other.
And you DO understand, don't you, that the Falklands are NOT part of Argentina?
Congratulations Presidenta Fernandez.
Oct 25th, 2011 - 11:17 am - Link - Report abuse 0Now TFI rhetoric can be reined-in
and the practical work of saving Argentina can commence.
One or two buffoons need immediately putting out to grass.
Are you guys actually arguing about spelling...? Guys, come on, that is a new low!
Oct 25th, 2011 - 02:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Think, I am yet to see your reaction to the link I posted. Has it shut you up and opened your eyes or have you failed to look at it? I am sure it’s the latter, because you are incapable to realising the truth.
How was my spelling? I checked it to make sure its okay, I would hate for someone to criticise my spelling. That would really hurt and humiliate me......
33 lsolde
Oct 25th, 2011 - 03:17 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Sorry to burst your bubble, Marcos, but no, l am not Emma Edwards
Que nena?
Señorita, please read comment#2 Mr Think wrote:
1) Marcos Alejandro......
Emma Edwards is leaving Malvinas???
This means that she's not Isolde!!!
Isolde would never leave :-)
Sorry tu burst your burst your bubble, xxxxxxxx.
lol!
Oct 25th, 2011 - 03:17 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Correction,
Oct 25th, 2011 - 03:19 pm - Link - Report abuse 0lol! to @35, not to you Marcos :-)
lol! to you too @38 Pomi
Oct 25th, 2011 - 03:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0contento que gano la bruja? :-)
Oct 25th, 2011 - 03:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Calentito que gano Cristina? :-) 54% I like that number
Oct 25th, 2011 - 03:34 pm - Link - Report abuse 0”Under the Kirchner administrations, Argentina has achieved the fastest growth in the west – after defaulting. Listening, Europe?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/oct/23/cristina-kirchner-argentina
You wont here from THINK again,
Oct 25th, 2011 - 04:06 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Not on this blogg, him and so-far, think its funny to insult people spelling, and love correcting others, but fail to realise their total stupidity,
Think very rarely talks to me, [thank got]
He thinks he is clever and a teacher of others,
But in reality think is ignorant, and indoctrinated, I used to have respect, but not for years now,
He give only answers to insinuate to others they are bad and he is clever, he gives half truths
And anti British rhetoric, and cajoles with fools like so-far, and others to intimidate,
Then refuses point black to return people questions or replies, if it proves him wrong,
He does not seem a rude man, but an encourager, of others
He calls brits, turnips, to belittle us, sadly he is a great wannaby,
He seeks what he can never truly except [THE TRUTH]
OH THINK
YOU ARE A PLONKER,
A new name for you.
Just a thought.,
@41
Oct 25th, 2011 - 04:17 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Pride Will Come Before the Fall
Looking forward to it :-))))
@41
Oct 25th, 2011 - 04:25 pm - Link - Report abuse 0what can I say? por 4 años más de crecimiento, dialogo, justicia, unión entre los argentinos y siempre mirando hacia el futuro!.... I'm being sarcastic, obviously ! :-)
perhaps when the election is over
Oct 25th, 2011 - 05:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0she will quietly go back to sleep.
briton, I dont ever expect for Think to respond to the evidence that I have provided that categorically proves that his assumptions and accusations are completely incorrect.
Oct 25th, 2011 - 05:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0you are right,
Oct 25th, 2011 - 06:35 pm - Link - Report abuse 0(46) M_of_FI
Oct 25th, 2011 - 06:43 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Thanks for the information…..Just a short comment about it:
1) It doesn’t inform anything about Mount Pleasant Airport.
2) It doesn’t inform anything about the importance of the 2,000 troops + 600 civilian personal for the economy of Malvinas.
3) About the hospital……:
A) It was the British Government that constructed that fine hospital, at a very high cost, after you Islanders burnt the old one in one of your famous drinking berserk runs. You Islanders have not and are not amortizating that “Expense” = Subsidy.
B) The MOD “reimburses” you 1.2 million £ a year. As I understand, the FIG(leaf) has a reciprocity agreement with the NHS by which you Islanders don’t pay for treatment in the UK. But British soldiers have to pay you? = Subsidy
C) As I understand, until recently, 2 GP’s, 1 Anesthetist and an undisclosed number of nurses where paid directly by the MOD = Subsidy.
No, Think, British 'soldiers' don't pay anything.
Oct 25th, 2011 - 07:55 pm - Link - Report abuse 0And your 'reciprocity' argument is complete bx. If there were 6o million islanders staying in the UK at any time, doubling the call for emergency surgical care, you might have a point, but actually, you don't. Anything that the UK government pays to FIG is to make sure the hospital has enough capacity for their contingency planning. And if that means that some of the hospital staff are less than busy some of the time, then that's up to them.So no, not a subsidy.
If you find out that the MOD are paying for midwives and dentists, I might start listening. They don't pay for GPs as they have their own, and and 'undisclosed number of nurses'?? if it's undisclosed, where did you get that from? They have to have some of their own medical and paramedic staff for search and rescue.
In the meantime, why don't you remind us all what precisely this has to do with you.
Think
Oct 26th, 2011 - 12:00 am - Link - Report abuse 0I understand, until recently, 2 GP’s, 1 Anesthetist where paid directly by your MoD.
Groundbreaking investigative research!
Yawn... and this was to prove what?
Your Murder Inc Imperial Fascist Militia don't have medical staff paid for?
Seriously is this all you have to do?
Think - do not insult us over the Hospital Fire trajedy - it was started by a UK Serviceman(last heard of in a mental institution) - NOT an Islander.
Oct 26th, 2011 - 01:05 am - Link - Report abuse 0(49) Monty96
Oct 26th, 2011 - 04:21 am - Link - Report abuse 0You say:
”No, Think, British 'soldiers' don't pay anything.”
I say:
Right, Monty, British taxpayers are paying the bills…..
(51) Islander1
Noted and understood…..........................
I retract my comment about the origin of the hospital fire.
But you have to admit that you people, occasionally, fancy a drink,… or two……
OK, Marcos, it was Think who said that.
Oct 26th, 2011 - 07:57 am - Link - Report abuse 0l made a mistake.
Big deal over such a trifle. What do you want me to do?, Grovel?
Think, as regards the hospital & the finances, so what?
What has that got to do with you?
And why are you so interested?
Haven't you got more interesting things to do?
Are your Collies trained with sheep? lf not, you could have many a fruitful hour training them.
Now that you mention that, Think, I do remember the general Argentine intolerance towards a drink for its own sake...
Oct 26th, 2011 - 09:09 am - Link - Report abuse 0Salud!
sake is nice, I drink it in Roskas
Oct 26th, 2011 - 09:15 am - Link - Report abuse 0Ah Think, what lovely theories you have come up with. It is funny that they are a watered down version of what you were peddling before. I accept that as a minor victory on my part. Before you said MOD funded 75% of the Hospital, but now only £1.2m, and that is for services provided to the MOD by the hospital. How can the hospital give away it precious services and expertise to an organisation for free!?
Oct 26th, 2011 - 11:48 am - Link - Report abuse 0Also, look on page 148 of the document I provided you, or what Adobe calls page 153, and you will see a payment by FIG to MOD labelled Air Terminal....
The document I provided you is the FIG budget, with actual revenues and expenditures from the previous year, it is how FIG funds itself and its departments. If you want an economic viewpoint on the influence of the MOD in the Falklands economy, I suggest you ask someone in the FIG Policy Unit. But from my recollection of their work, MOD's contribution to local businesses isn’t that much...The Globe may live off of it, but other than that, not much. If you have actually visited the Falklands, you will see that the military only really venture into Stanley on the weekends, and their only contribution is in the pubs, where they usually cost more (damage to property) than they actually pay for, as their food and accommodation is provided by the military. And they don’t come in every weekend. But that is what I call local knowledge, which trumps your assumptions based on what you hope is reality hundreds of miles away.
The crap about the nurses etc. being paid by the MOD, rubbish! Don’t always listen to rumours Think ;-) You try and portray yourself as smarter than that, but it is good to see you clutching at straws.
The UK did provide a lot of funding after the war for infrastructure, this is what made us self-sufficient, after years of neglect that led to the aggressive invasion of Argentine forces. Now with Fisheries and Tourism, and in the future hopefully Oil, we are self-sufficient.
53 lsolde OK, Marcos, it was Think who said that.
Oct 26th, 2011 - 04:07 pm - Link - Report abuse 0l made a mistake
Not to worry Isolde, we are humans and you are British on top of that.
Repeat after me M a l v i n a s A r g e n t in a s
Got it?
Good girl!
Less vodka and more creamy coffee. :-)
Christina Kirchiner in her younger days
Oct 26th, 2011 - 05:06 pm - Link - Report abuse 0http://www.mywebpower.com/graphics/sthumbs/funny_pictures/funny_monkey_bikini.jpg
#57 sorry Marcos.....Isolde is busy taking a ride with Monty protecting the islands from Argentine invasion
Oct 26th, 2011 - 06:55 pm - Link - Report abuse 0:)
p.d. interesting Flag
http://www.kideternal.com/Jetgirl/Pictures/Jet%20Drives%20Tank.JPG
The Falklands are British because we (the people of the place in question) say they are. End of story Marcos.
Oct 26th, 2011 - 07:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0#60 yes....i remember others British in the past said the same in:
Oct 26th, 2011 - 07:35 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Egypt
India
America
Asia
Hong Kong
Singapure
etc. etc
All them have something in common.....they were wrong.
Is all matter of time dear kid....Malvinas Argentinas, understand that once for all, you´re there ONLY by force....international comunnity knows perfectly that.
61 so_far
Oct 26th, 2011 - 08:18 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Again like think
You are so wrong,
The countries you mention, were given their independence, were they not, so they are now and forever out of the equation,
Those that are left, were offered their independence, and by their own free will have decided to remain British, that is not empire, that is freedom of choice,
The Falklands and Belize, as an example, want independence, but their very greedy and aggressive neighbours keep on attacking or threatening them, so British forces have to remain to protect them,
Until such time as they grow up and stop acting like spoilt children and let them live in peace,
As for
Think
Does it really matter if Britain subsidises people or places, does it really matter,
Who does Argentina subsidise, what about your illegal colony in the Antarctica, does not Argentina pay for things for them,
What Britain pays and what it does not, is British business, and who Argentina subsidises is hers,
Why all the slugging of,
Just a thought. .
59 so_far Nice picture of the girls :-))
Oct 27th, 2011 - 04:16 am - Link - Report abuse 0@59 so_far,
Oct 27th, 2011 - 08:26 am - Link - Report abuse 0Thats it, comrade. Mess with us & you'll walk the plank. Got it?
A matter of time, eh? You don't have that time. Probably Brazil will invade Argentina long, long before you ever can invade us again.
@57 Marcos,
ln your dreams señor. The Falklands belong to the Falklanders, next in line would be the British. No-one else is on the list.
61 so_far
Oct 27th, 2011 - 09:09 am - Link - Report abuse 0Singapure ?
Yep good old Singapore
Singapore govt ups stake in Rockhopper Exploration
#59 So Fa,
Oct 27th, 2011 - 11:59 am - Link - Report abuse 0www.kideternal.com/Jetgirl/Pictures/Jet%20Drives%20Tank.JPG
This is a pun - it should be JettGirl.
Joan Jett = Tank Girl
Rock On, Joan!
Or you could be Petty and choose the actress rather than the singer.
@61...
Oct 27th, 2011 - 12:05 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You have listed a group of nations that all gained independence....they got what they wanted, just like the people of the Falklands have and will always have.
Tell me...how am I here by force? I was born here, as was my father and his father, and his father, and his father and his father and his father. How many generations do you go back in Argentina?
The arrogance of Argentines is something that always confuses me. Argentina as a country has never accomplished anything. A country with a murky past that involves dictatorships, assisting war criminals, assisting the Nazis, economic incompetence, exterminating its own people, murdering its own people, never winning a war, spreading lies across the world, celebrates terrorism, invading and imposing itself on a small island community, and trying to ensure 3000 people do not have human rights to achieve their imperialist ambitions, partnering up with currently the most dangerous states in the world, and the gullibility and naivety of a child. Yes, what a proud and mighty nation you are. You claim to be a democracy…laughable. Yes, your Plastic President trying to change the laws to allow successive stints in charge, that will change to needing an election every decade or so. Argentina will takeover Chavez’s mantle as the rogue and oppressive nation in South America.
you said...Is all matter of time dear kid...Malvinas Argentinas, understand that once for all, you´re there ONLY by force....international comunnity knows perfectly that.
I say, the international community doesnt suport you, you tag on your claim to unrelated agreements and organisation which other nations have no choice but to accept. How is this support? None of these countries have actually done anything of substance to support your claim.
So it is only a matter of time for Argentina to colonise the Falklands? If that happens we will just become independent with the use of self-determination, as afforded to all people by the UN.
# 67
Oct 27th, 2011 - 01:03 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The only part that make sense and deserve an answer....
So it is only a matter of time for Argentina to colonise the Falklands? If that happens we will just become independent with the use of self-determination, as afforded to all people by the UN.
Yes boy, you right there, you could become independient anytime you wish BUT....from Argentina the real and legal owner of Malvinas, its.up to you people make the things properly. Now in the eyes of international community you lot are only SQUATTERS and a vil tool from UK for keep this madness in an stable and pacefully region.
None of your reply deserves a response because it is riddled with lies and factual inaccuracies.
Oct 27th, 2011 - 01:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The real owners of the Falkland Islands are the people who were born there and the people who live there and make the Falklands what is it. Not some arrogant Argentine who lives hundreds of miles away, who has no intention ever visiting the place in question or any desire to live there. Your attitude sickens me and your arrogance is laughable.
Argentina are the only ones threatening peace in South America, we are just trying to live our lives the best we can. Argentina is the only country trying to disrupt things. Britain has nothing to do with it. They only protect us because you disrupted the peace 29 years ago. Argentina is the only country in this region that has a history of disrupting the peace.
You consider the real owners of the Falklands squatters, and I call you imperialists. The only important factor is that the people of the Falklands has the right to choose, provided by the UN.
Also, you didnt explain how I am forced to live here?
a dictatorship that pretends to be a democracy
Oct 27th, 2011 - 08:01 pm - Link - Report abuse 0a goverment that lies to its own people,
but as you can only talk, then whats your problem,
your already showing the world how good you are at talking,
laugh laugh.
thr falklands are british,
a dictatorship that pretends to be a democracy
Oct 27th, 2011 - 10:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0a goverment that lies to its own people,
but as you can only talk, then ,really britton??/I think is a full fledge democracy in Argentina....You do not like it? go away! We do not need you!
laugh laugh.
thr falklands are british” relaly? For how long???
AHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!
@ 69M_of_FI,
Oct 28th, 2011 - 08:49 am - Link - Report abuse 0Don't take any notice of fools like so_far, l think he's an implanted Croatian immigrant anyway. He's never come up with anything worthwhile. Just repeats the Argentine whine.
@71Malvinero1,
Whats the matter malvin, keyboard stuck like that silly malen's?
Another implanted immigrant, this time from ltaly.
Then of course we have dear old Think, 1st generation Argentine from Sweden.
Well, M_of_FI, their cheek is astounding considering you are 6th or 7th generation. Grasping scumbags, the whole shower of them.
Whats the matter malvin, keyboard stuck like that silly malen's?
Oct 28th, 2011 - 09:02 am - Link - Report abuse 0Another implanted immigrant, this time from ltaly.
Then of course we have dear old Think, 1st generation
I prefer to live in Argentina,than bankrupt ,criminal uk...
Well, live in Argentina. l don't care. Just keep your thieving hands off the Falklands.
Oct 28th, 2011 - 09:22 am - Link - Report abuse 073 Malvinero1
Oct 28th, 2011 - 12:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0We should get rid of all the immigrants, too many Paraguayans, Peruvians and Bolivians, etc they are criminals. But most importantly we need to cleanse the country of anglos. There are too many anglos pose as Argentine. They will never be, they are traitors all of them colonials, they are all agents of the crown of England.
I do not care for the rights of any immigrants, including the pirates on las malvinas. Their history is no valid, we have created a new history.
It is proud loyal patriots to their nation like Think and James Peck we must look to, to show the way for all other national patriots. The people of las Malvinas can be reborn Argentine like James Peck whose father was a traitor to Argentina and a war hero of the British. He should have been hung for his crimes, if we had won he would have been disapeared but lucky his son has come right and now is a central to our propaganda war.
Go home pieates
Well you wanted CFK and you got her, now what's that old saying arrrrr yes Be careful what you wish for, as you just may get it, well CFK that is but never the Falklands.
Oct 28th, 2011 - 12:59 pm - Link - Report abuse 0(72) Isolde
Oct 28th, 2011 - 02:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Then of course we have dear old Think, 1st generation Argentine from Sweden.
Sweden???..............
Bloody Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeden???
Do I look like a Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeede???
Do I sound like a Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeede???
You............, you................................................................ Pom.
Pom = Prisoner of her Majesty?
Oct 28th, 2011 - 03:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 071 Malvinero1
Oct 28th, 2011 - 05:18 pm - Link - Report abuse 0thruth hurts does it not.
your goverments full of B/S
even today to indocrinated unhinged mouth piece open up his river again to sprout crap, and you indocrinated bloggers all worship them,
dont say for your goverment
and even less for her indocrinated bloggers,
laugh laugh.
@78 Artillero601,
Oct 28th, 2011 - 07:45 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Pom or Pommy. Originally from Australia & means Englishman.
Can be an insult & can be a term of affection. lt just depends on the context & tone of voice.
Some English don't like it but a lot don't care or find it funny.
l have been called a Pom by experts, so what Think says doesn't worry me. He is a Swedish amateur. Only teasing, he says that he is not Swedish.
There are arguements as to its original meaning.
1) As you said, prisoner of his/her majesty. POHM
2)Prisoner of Mother England, POME
3)Rhymes with Emigrant, Pomegranate(the fruit), shortened to POM.
No doubt others.
@77 Think,
Your keyboard stuck too, Cher Think? You'll have to stop buying those cheap Chinese computers as will malen & malvinero1.
Don't you like the Swedes either, Cher Think? l've only met about half a dozen of them & l liked the ones l met.
pommy granite,
Oct 28th, 2011 - 07:54 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Hard as nails, but not the coffin type,
Swedes are ok,
But not as good as turnips, lol
l wonder if Cher Think knows the difference between a Swede & a swede?
Oct 28th, 2011 - 08:11 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Artillero601:
Oct 28th, 2011 - 11:36 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Been to Australia a few times. It's mostly a nice nickname they have for us. The Aussies have very much the same sense of humor we do unlike the Americans to be honest. It's a very insulty-jokey relationship. Quite like in the UK.
But yeah. It means a British person. I was told it's because of the accent the posh British people speak in. Plumb in mouth and all that.
On the basis of the British invasion of Río de la Plata I have been able to establish that Argentina is in fact owned by Great Britain.
Oct 29th, 2011 - 09:07 pm - Link - Report abuse 0I have been tabling a series of motions at the UN in order to officially establish this claim to Argentina. There is historical president for this, on the basis of an almost 200 year invasion of the Falkland Islands by a German and some British ex patriots, Argentina claims the Falkland Islands.
I can establish as historical fact that Río de la Plata was invaded by Britain and that this claim was never renounced, there is over 200 years of continued British claim to Argentina.
This makes all Argentines suject to British law and taxation. I am planning to get Buenos Aires renamed Port of Britain. Argentina will be called Bairdland, after the leader of British forces in the first occupation of Río de la Plata.
It is important to state that this did not happen just once - as in the Argentine claim to the Falklands....... but twice!
@80 & @83
Oct 31st, 2011 - 02:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Thanks !
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!