MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, January 27th 2023 - 00:57 UTC

 

 

Happy ending for Durban climate summit: Kyoto Protocol extended to 2017

Monday, December 12th 2011 - 05:11 UTC
Full article 2 comments
South African Minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane who chaired the talks said “history was made” South African Minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane who chaired the talks said “history was made”

Climate negotiators agreed a pact that would for the first time force all the biggest polluters to take action on greenhouse gas emissions, but critics said the action plan was not aggressive enough to slow the pace of global warming.

The package of accords extended the Kyoto Protocol, the only global pact that enforces carbon cuts, agreed the format of a fund to help poor countries tackle climate change and mapped out a path to a legally binding agreement on emissions reductions.

But many small island states and developing nations at risk of being swamped by rising sea levels and extreme weather said the deal marked the lowest common denominator possible and lacked the ambition needed to ensure their survival.

Agreement on the package, reached in the early hours of Sunday, avoided a collapse of the talks and spared the blushes of host South Africa, whose stewardship of the two weeks of often fractious negotiations came under fire from rich and poor nations.

“We came here with plan A, and we have concluded this meeting with plan A to save one planet for the future of our children and our grandchildren to come,” said South African Foreign Minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, who chaired the talks.

“We have made history,” she said, bringing the hammer down on Durban conference, the longest in two decades of U.N. climate negotiations.

Delegates agreed to start work next year on a new legally binding treaty to cut greenhouse gases to be decided by 2015 and to come into force by 2020.

The process for doing so, called the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action, would “develop a new protocol, another legal instrument or agreed outcome with legal force” that would be applicable under the U.N. climate convention.

That phrasing, agreed at a last-ditch huddle in the conference centre between the European Union, India, China and the United States, was used by all parties to claim victory.

Britain's Energy and Climate Secretary Chris Huhne said the result was “a great success for European diplomacy.”

“We've managed to bring the major emitters like the U.S., India and China into a roadmap which will secure an overarching global deal,” he said.

US climate envoy Todd Stern said Washington was satisfied with the outcome: “We got the kind of symmetry that we had been focused on since the beginning of the Obama administration. This had all the elements that we were looking for.”

Yet UN climate chief Christiana Figueres acknowledged the final wording on the legal form a future deal was ambiguous: “What that means has yet to be decided.”

A UN spokesman said the final texts might not all be publicly available for some days.

Environmentalists said governments’ wasted valuable time by focusing on a handful of specific words in the negotiating text, and failed to raise emissions cuts to a level high enough to reduce global warming.

Sunday's deal follows years of failed attempts to impose legally-binding, international cuts on emerging giants, such as China and India, as well as rich nations like the United States.

The developed world had already accepted formal targets under a first phase of the Kyoto Protocol, which runs out at the end of next year, although Washington never ratified its commitment.

Sunday's deal extends Kyoto until the end of 2017, ensuring there is no gap between commitment periods, but EU delegates said lawyers would have to reconcile those dates with existing EU legislation.

 

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Britishbulldog

    Don't know what this reporter was smoking but all this lot agreed to do was to agree to come back and have another good time at the expense of every tax paying citizen.

    As for Global Warming show me one iota of proof that CO2 is the primary control of Global Warming that incidentally stopped in 1998. And don't bother to cite the IPCC because its been shown and proved that it has been infiltrated by Green activists with agenda's many from Greenpeace even the chairman is a green activists. Oh and by the way its now called Climate Change, the Green warmegednist activists stopped calling it Global Warming a couple of years ago when they suddenly found out that they were not fooling everyone.

    Dec 12th, 2011 - 08:55 am 0
  • ChrisR

    #1 The credibility took a dive right from the word go when Prescott (now Lord Prescott for gods' sake) backed it.

    That moron can't string two words together.

    Dec 12th, 2011 - 10:17 am 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!