MercoPress. South Atlantic News Agency
Uruguay’s position on barring Malvinas flagged vessels “has not changed an iota”
In an official communiqué Uruguay ratified full support for Argentina’s Malvinas sovereignty claim and underlined that the barring of Malvinas’ flagged vessel from Uruguayan ports stands and “has not changed an iota”. Read full article
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesThe Facklanders treat us as muppets but it must be very sad for them not to be recognized by anybody. There must change their flags, so that shows their attitude must change with the rest of the countries, they think they can control us and we don't want to be part of the long conflict (or love story)
Jan 12th, 2012 - 01:37 pm - Link - Report abuse 0UK may say whatever they want or wish, relaity will always prevail. The same as Argentinas's sovereignty over the islands!
Jan 12th, 2012 - 03:09 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The reality is that the Falklands are a British Overseas Territory as long as the islanders wish that to be true.
Jan 12th, 2012 - 03:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The other reality is that Argentina has no sovereignty over the Falklands!!
Both these realities will prevail until Hell freezes over.
“Uruguay considers the Malvinas Islands as an English colonial possession in Latin America..”
Jan 12th, 2012 - 03:44 pm - Link - Report abuse 01) got it ?
”..consequently can’t recognize their (illegal) flag..”
2) got it ?
”This anti-colonialist stance it not a solitary position from Uruguay, but of the whole of Latin America”
3) got it ?
“Under no circumstances can we accept vessels with the Malvinas flag in our ports”
4) got it ?
”...creating the necessary conditions for a peaceful negotiation, the sole path to solve this historic difference and “longstanding painful controversy”
5) got it ?
“Uruguay......it does not authorize the docking of English naval units with destination Malvinas”
6) got it ?
““There is a political definition not to allow the access to Uruguayan ports of vessels flying the Malvinas Islands flag and whose sovereignty is claimed by Argentina with the support of Uruguay”
7) got it ?
”Uruguay’s position on barring Malvinas flagged vessels “has not changed an iota”
8) got it ?
“Under no circumstances can we accept vessels with the Malvinas flag in our ports”
9) got it ?
How many FACTS you need for understand that NOBODY in LATAM will EVER recognise your supposed “rights” ? you´re only british invaders and you have rights of course in your loved UK...thats a FACT.
@1. So when you say everybody, you just mean Uruguay, Brazil and Chile?
Jan 12th, 2012 - 04:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@ 4. What about French Guiana so_far?
Mr Hague, anything else you wish to add? :-)))
Jan 12th, 2012 - 04:07 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@5: I never said “everybody” ;-( you need glasses
Jan 12th, 2012 - 04:09 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Anybody means anybody
”“Uruguay considers the Malvinas Islands as an English colonial possession in Latin America..”
Jan 12th, 2012 - 04:17 pm - Link - Report abuse 0That's nice to know. In other words, Uruguay doesn't consider the Islands to be part of Argentina.
@7, semantics Jefferson, everybody and anybody in the context of what you were saying means the same thing.
Jan 12th, 2012 - 04:20 pm - Link - Report abuse 0no country is reclaming “Guiana”.....France was more clever, fair and astute in his move....they´re in peace in the region....even with Malvinas they act with dignity long time ago when they “cede” their rights to Spain...the only one DIRTY here is UK who (like allways) broke NOOTKA.....allways England acting outlaw, disgusting and the main reason we´re talking with this madness situation.
Jan 12th, 2012 - 04:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@10
Jan 12th, 2012 - 04:54 pm - Link - Report abuse 0When we stole the land from Paraguay, was Paraguay's fault too? We're not that nice so_far.
@9 You need Glasses M_of_FI !!!.
Jan 12th, 2012 - 04:55 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Anybody and Everybody are two different words...
Besides glasses, you also need some grammar lessons, English is not my mother tongue so any mistake I can make is acceptable
Or should I say “Every” Mistake is acceptable?
Do you see the difference?
@10: So_facile:
Jan 12th, 2012 - 05:03 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The only reason French Guiana is not been claimed by anyone is that Argentina is not next to it. The Brazilians are obviously far more reasonable people. There was a border dispute, but that was settled amicably.
@M_of_FI:
Jan 12th, 2012 - 05:18 pm - Link - Report abuse 0This is an interesting link where you can find the answers and also practice your English
http://www.englishpractice.com/grammar/somebody-someone-anybody-anyone-etc/
Hope this helps--
#13:The only reason French Guiana is not been claimed by anyone is that Argentina is not next to it.
Jan 12th, 2012 - 06:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0AHHHHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAH! We are not easily frighten,by the bully pirates brits.1806/1807/1840..the brits never succeeded in dominating Argentina,and certainly,we WILL RECOVER MALVINAS!! We inherited and we were there...The brits pirats,signed the 1825 treaty of frienship and commerce,WHAT A PRICK the brits,MY GOD!
Actually it was Spain that unilaterally repudiated the Nootka Convention in 1795. Irrelevant anyway as it was never intended to include the Falkland Islands.
Jan 12th, 2012 - 06:52 pm - Link - Report abuse 0“solidarity based on close historical and cultural fraternity links”
Jan 12th, 2012 - 06:54 pm - Link - Report abuse 0So definately a “Gringo thing” .
@ 15 You are like a little girl crying over a barbie doll when her mommy doesn't have money enough to buy it. Have some dignity, please.
Jan 12th, 2012 - 06:55 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@10...French Guiana is still a colony of France. I thought South America is trying to eradicate colonies from South America? French Guiana is considered mainland France. Its currency is the Euro. It is governed from Paris. It is the only colony in South America.
Jan 12th, 2012 - 07:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@12. I understand they are different words, but the context of your statement wont differ with the use of either word. But lets rejoice in your victory! By using petty semantics you win! Well done Jefferson, but unfortunately is doesnt assist your country's quest in colonising the Falklands. Terrible shame! And thanks for the English lessons, they are much better than an Argentine's history lesson.
@15 Mal vino: “the brits never succeeded in dominating Argentina..”
Jan 12th, 2012 - 08:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You seem to have conveniently erased the events of 1982 from your memory.
What memory!
Jan 12th, 2012 - 08:29 pm - Link - Report abuse 0#20 Actually Cracky boy he´s right....in 1982 UK couldn´t win alone, on the contrary you were humillieated ........so you start to cry like babies for NATO, USA and Chile help....and only in THAT moment all together defeat Argentina. Thats a FACT
Jan 12th, 2012 - 08:33 pm - Link - Report abuse 0just as WWI
just as WWII
as allways....UK NEVER EVER fight alone.......and thats a FACT too.
Sofa. Argentina was not a signatory to Nootka, mainly because Argentina did not exist when Nootka was signed, so cannot benefit from Nootka. There's a fact for you to understand.
Jan 12th, 2012 - 08:40 pm - Link - Report abuse 0to tell a lie is not to be belived again,
Jan 12th, 2012 - 08:45 pm - Link - Report abuse 0you know very well that argentina also had help in 1982,
the difference was
that britain recieved technicle help
and argentina recieved direct help from peru, did she not,
who helped who is irrelivent, the result still stands
you lost,
And the Uruguayan position is? Being bent over and shafted in the butt by Argentina.
Jan 12th, 2012 - 09:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You like the butt conqueror.Do you get some.
Jan 12th, 2012 - 10:08 pm - Link - Report abuse 0South America is ONE! Cisplatine Province it is South America. Chile do trade with us too. Chile its South America. Brazil its South America. SOUTH AMERICA IS ONLY ONE! ONE CONTINENT, ONLY ONE COUNTRY! Malvinas its South America too, no english. And, Scotland will be free too!!!
Jan 12th, 2012 - 10:18 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@22 so_facile:
Jan 12th, 2012 - 10:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0We can't help it if everyone thinks that we are fabulous and wants to help us out a bit now and then. It's called having friends and allies and it's a useful weapon in the fight against tinpot third world countries with delusions of grandeur. Not that we got too much assistance in 1982 anyway (as you well know).
You definitely have a very unusual concept of humilation. So, I ran to my dictionary to double-check that I hadn't got it wrong. It read: ”HUMILIATION (noun). Definition: the state or feeling of being humiliated (ie, experiencing reduced or hurt dignity or pride), as happened to Argentina in 1982.”
Long live to THIRD WORLD! The promissed land is here!
Jan 12th, 2012 - 10:36 pm - Link - Report abuse 0We see the indoctrination studies are having some effect on some brazilin friends,
Jan 12th, 2012 - 10:37 pm - Link - Report abuse 0He to thinks south America, one country one government,
Run by Argentina .
As for Scot, that’s our problem, you have enough .
Scotland no more your problem. In 2014, in day of Batlle Blackburn, Scotland will be free too. England no more rules the world. And, Brazil and all Soth América, like to Prússia and Germanies Kingdons, will be a ONLY COUNTRY
Jan 12th, 2012 - 10:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0yeh and CFK will rule over brazil.
Jan 12th, 2012 - 11:04 pm - Link - Report abuse 0and pigs fly
The england citzen, named Briton, dont have more arguments?
Jan 12th, 2012 - 11:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Este Willy se les rie en la cara a estos pobres tipos que tienen encerrados en las islas...
Jan 13th, 2012 - 05:26 am - Link - Report abuse 0SIIII OKUPAS... PAPA NOEL EXISTE.... jajajajajja
Don't mind him, briton. He's just another silly malvinista who knows jack s... as our American cousins say!
Jan 13th, 2012 - 05:48 am - Link - Report abuse 0@31 Brasileiro,
Scotland is free to leave the UK whenever they feel like it.
No one is going to try to stop them, so what is your problem?
@22 so_far,
You forgot the Chinese laundrymen on the British ships, brad.
Don't tell geo, but they were actually Chinese Special Forces on our side!
You want to check that “solidarity” with China, mate.
They're just using you to help get Taiwan.
@15 Malvinero1,
Oh no, you regressed. Your fingers just can't lift themselves from the keyboard, can they? You have my sympathy.
You seem to have conveniently erased the events of 1982 from your memory.
Jan 13th, 2012 - 11:58 am - Link - Report abuse 0cpotty: You won a battle,not the war......We still have Argentina,wich the brits,they will ever,never have..
You just have a desolated subantartic island,thatt you will loose....No question about that...
32 briton 35 lsolde thanks
Jan 13th, 2012 - 02:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0he want something else that is not theirs,
another brainwashed person .
@36: Mal vino:
Jan 13th, 2012 - 02:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0What of Earth would we want Argentina for? That was never part of the equation. We didn't keep Germany after the end of WW2. We just kept what was ours.
Correct me if I'm wrong but the “battle” as you like to call it was over the Falkland Islands (those Islands that you class as part of Argentina). You lost. Get over it and move on. Whether it was a battle or a war in 1982, nobody could deny that it was an utterly humilating defeat for Argentina. The UK has had its fair share of miltary defeats in the past - the country accepted them, learned from them and moved on. Denying it will only make things harder for you.
Does it also mean that you think the UK and Argentina are still at war and somehow you're going to miracualously pull a victory from the jaws of defeat. You lost a long time ago. Try to accept reality.
well if you dont think being beaten by an little island race, a fraction of your size,
Jan 13th, 2012 - 03:48 pm - Link - Report abuse 0is humiliating,
perhaps you think the mighty navy you have stopping unarmed fishing boats is a victory,
ah well, some mothers have them ?
children i mean ?.
@34 rmalone
Jan 13th, 2012 - 03:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Has nobody told you, there is no such thing as:
father xmas
slightly pregnant
a temporary tax
military inteligence
money in birthday cards
or the malvinas
They are all mythical.
Malviner - 1982 was a war with a beginning and an end. Argentina started it and Argentina ended it by signing what was in effect an unconditional surrender. Sorry about being better than you, it is just the result of natural selection.
Jan 13th, 2012 - 04:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The only victory you are now claiming is the banning of a piece of fabric on some fishing boats that can happily fly another one of the Red Ensign family and enter any port they wish. These ships remain FI registered. If you call that a victory then you are either easily pleased or have exceptionally low standards.
What war are you fighting now because I don't see one?
Ten days until the Leiv Eriksson arrives :-) Not very good at getting your own way are you?
Technicaly speaking 1982 was a conflict, involving battles such as goose green for example, for a war there has to be a declaration of war.
Jan 13th, 2012 - 05:14 pm - Link - Report abuse 0I think wot malviner means is the struggle is not over.
war is after all an extension of diplomacy.
And the struggle is the aftermath of the men in white coats, is it not,
Jan 13th, 2012 - 07:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Mind you my dau, did see the tooth fairy, [didn’t she??]
or was mummy’s fairy ?
Malvinero1, the “implanted” ltalian, who can't accept that he was defeated.
Jan 13th, 2012 - 09:46 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Move on, boy. Forget the past. Make something of your new country.
or you will end up like your hero,
Jan 13th, 2012 - 09:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0hung like a chicken .
@45 briton
Jan 13th, 2012 - 09:58 pm - Link - Report abuse 0I heard that he already was “hung like a chicken”.
no wonder he has his head ???
Jan 13th, 2012 - 11:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Granted that the Falklands flag is part of an “Injusticialist”-Argentinian blockade.
Jan 14th, 2012 - 08:38 pm - Link - Report abuse 0But since there is only a so-called fiction-“malvinas,” then do the Falklands really exist, do they?!
Now to add to the Injusticialist confusion, one could ask, what about postage stamps? Suppose they show the Falklands flag, will they be allowed to “violate” Argentina's fascistic air/sea blockade?
Apologies, but I find Argentina every day more and more, and more confusing!
Philippe
So does the world,
Jan 14th, 2012 - 11:54 pm - Link - Report abuse 0http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/elpais/1-185509-2012-01-15.html
Jan 15th, 2012 - 07:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0People from MERCOPRESS.
argentina.indocrination.com
Jan 15th, 2012 - 08:45 pm - Link - Report abuse 0people from never never land .
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!