Brazilian prosecutors on Tuesday unveiled the first criminal charges for crimes committed during the two-decade military dictatorship which ended almost a quarter of a century ago. Read full article
As is the case with the Australian Intervention-- this law and intent of those behind it must be called into questions. At first glance there are five main reasons for this.
1--It quiet clearly subverts indigenous rights.?
2- It balantly mischaracterizes the facts to justify the alleged need of an intervention.?
3- It is entirely discriminatory.?
4- It grossly criminalizes all indigenous people.?
5- It would have an immesaurable impact on their everyday life.?
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesit took 25 years to put together charges for this? Seriously? 25 years?
Mar 14th, 2012 - 08:32 am - Link - Report abuse 0As is the case with the Australian Intervention-- this law and intent of those behind it must be called into questions. At first glance there are five main reasons for this.
Mar 14th, 2012 - 10:24 am - Link - Report abuse 01--It quiet clearly subverts indigenous rights.?
2- It balantly mischaracterizes the facts to justify the alleged need of an intervention.?
3- It is entirely discriminatory.?
4- It grossly criminalizes all indigenous people.?
5- It would have an immesaurable impact on their everyday life.?
More to the point it presents a core judicary dilemma:
Mar 15th, 2012 - 12:34 am - Link - Report abuse 0i The trials are to go ahead
ii The Amnesty is still in place.
So, Guilty, but go free!
.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!