MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, December 23rd 2024 - 14:49 UTC

 

 

UK deploys more troops to help secure the London Olympics

Tuesday, July 24th 2012 - 23:30 UTC
Full article 13 comments

The UK government will deploy the 1,200 troops who were put on stand-by last week to help secure the London Olympics, a British minister said as security arrangements were tweaked to make up for a private firm's failure to recruit enough guards. Read full article

Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Yomp to victory

    I'm waiting for the inevitable Argietard drivel about the UK militarising the Olympics.

    Jul 25th, 2012 - 08:34 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Idlehands

    Terrible news:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/london-2012-argentina-to-snub-uk-by-refusing-to-send-president-to-olympic-games-opening-ceremony-7973022.html

    CFK is snubbing the UK by refusing to attend the Olympic opening ceremony.

    I'm sure our entire nation will be in tears at this tragedy. The projected increase in sales of eggs and tomatoes will be a sad loss for our economy.

    Jul 25th, 2012 - 09:00 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Yomp to victory

    LOL @ idlehands

    Funny isn't it? The saggy old bitch was never welcome in the first place, so why would anyone perceive it as a snub that she isn't there? She is like the unwelcome evil aunt that no-one wants to invite to a wedding, but who still gets an invite for the sake of appearances.

    Jul 25th, 2012 - 09:08 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Rufus

    @ Idlehands

    If it hadn't been announced in the press then I can be reasonably sure than no-one would have noticed being snubbed by KFC. How can we make this snubbing a more permanant arrangement where she has a huff and doesn't turn up to anything at all?

    Does it mean that there's a spare dignitary-grade ticket going for the opening ceremony? If so, then wouldn't it be poetic if they reassigned it to someone from the Falkland Islands Government instead?

    Jul 25th, 2012 - 02:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • ElaineB

    Snub? She doesn't have the cojones to show her face in the UK. Remember how she looked like a child caught telling lies when Cameron confronted her? This is a woman who won't even face the press in her own country.

    As for the security issue. I would rather have the troops there than gap year students with a day or so of training. I do wonder, though, if this is something to do with the increase in security threat, rather than a last minute failure to provide enough staff.

    Jul 25th, 2012 - 02:44 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • aussie sunshine

    GOOD GOD!! what a fiasco!!
    can´t even organise security for the Olympic games who in
    the world will feel safe there!!??
    Surface to air missiles from an apartment block that nobody wants
    and soldiers with machine guns in every corner. I think I will stay home!LOL

    Jul 25th, 2012 - 03:17 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • British_Kirchnerist

    #2 Why would she? Especially to an event overseen by Jeremy Hunt which must be rhyming slang (Gene Hunt would be a safer pair of hands with the police than him if you ask me!) and should be out of office long ago for his well proven corrupt relationship with the disgraced Murdoch press. How many Presidents ARE coming anyway? Its a shame I won't be able to pull out the red carpet but I'm sure she has more important things to do, like washing her hair, than dignify this corporatised and securitised nightmare of a Games with her lovely presence!

    #5 Take off your anti-Cristina blinkers, the unchivalrous Cameron came off the worse in that encounter

    Jul 25th, 2012 - 07:48 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • LEPRecon

    Don't worry Argentina we still have plenty of troops to stop any of you who think this might be a good time to invade the Falklands.

    @6 - Aussie.

    These soldiers won't be armed, they are their to do what G4S couldn't, act as security guards.

    You'll never see the soldiers that are armed, unless a group of terrorists try a Mumbai style attack. If that happens everyone will be glad the troops are there.

    The only difference between this Olympics and any other is that the Olympic committee opted to tender security out. I've worked along side G4S before, they were a shambles then so I'm not surprised they couldn't pull this off. Their usual MO is to drastically underbid to win the contract, then put 'extra' costs on afterwards. They're sh!t, but this time they've fumbled the ball big time, I doubt they'll remain in business for long (unless they give themselves a new identity). The government should refuse to pay them anything as they have failed to meet their obligations under the contract.

    As for the soldiers, they'll probably be pissed off (leave cancelled etc..) having to babysit tourists.

    It was reported that the organisers wanted the soldiers to wear track suits instead of their combats, so they wouldn't look 'aggressive'. The MOD replied, they wear combats or they won't be going at all. The organisers whimpered and left with their tails tucked firmly between their legs.

    Jul 25th, 2012 - 07:55 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • briton

    Sorry boys
    Aparently, the sneaky CFK will send sussieusa,
    to represent argentina,

    apparently she likes all the games with balls .

    Jul 25th, 2012 - 09:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • aussie sunshine

    @8 Thanks for clearing that up!! Good luck to the boys in blue.

    Jul 25th, 2012 - 11:47 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • GeoffWard2

    This London Olympics is the greatest obvious target for terrorists, odd-balls, people with grudges, etc, etc.

    The chance to publicly kill lots of people from all over the world is too good to miss.

    That's why we deploy security organisations and the Police (public order), and the armed forces (defence of the people and the state).
    If the army assume security roles then this adds another 'defence in depth' to the visitors to the UK and its own people. In an instant these security-squaddies can switch to terminators of terrorists.
    Be reassured that it is so, because none of the world's nations wants it's athletes, supporters, etc to to be returned home in coffins ... like happened to the Israeli team members at the Munich Olympics.

    Jul 26th, 2012 - 04:34 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • briton

    If you are going to be protected,

    then you may as well be protected by the best .

    Jul 26th, 2012 - 08:38 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Clyde15

    #7BK
    You purport to live in the UK but all we ever hear from you is a succession of put-downs over everything that comes from this country. If your life is so miserable here and you obviously cannot stand the politics in the UK, why don't you emigrate to the promised land of Queen Christina where life is so much better ?
    I am rather suspicious of someone who seems to know so much about the politics of Argentina and the rest of the continent.
    The average“Jock” could not tell the name of the president of any S.A. country and could not care less. It does beg the credentials of where you belong and your nationality.
    At least I have told everyone where I am from and can judge whether my prejudices are at least from an UK perspective.

    #6 Please do !!!!!!

    Jul 28th, 2012 - 03:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!