The UN General Assembly elected Argentina, Rwanda and Australia to the 15-national Security Council for 2013 and 2014. Rwanda and Argentina were unopposed in their bids for the Africa seat and the Latin American and Caribbean seat. Read full article
What neighborhood? The invade countries preemetively and kill women and children neighborhood? All a bunch of criminals, those represented in that body. fact... I would be ashamed to belong to those countries.
Of course you get an overwhelming result if you are they only one in the race.
But I suppose it might distract a few citizens for a while.
Meanwhile, instead of representing the whole of South America, Argentina kicks off with a tirade about something that has nothing to do with the people they're meant to be representing.
I find it funny that they mention that they want to bring about the end of colonialism. Does this mean that they've decided to stop trying to colonise the Falklands?
Argentina on the security council? I see the UN is less and less prestigious. Anybody who would want anything to do with a garbage country like this one, where crime is spiraling out of control, and know NOTHING about security, honestly or anything that is not corrupt and destructive is crazy!
He changes his thing based on earlier discussions with you guys. The mention of yellow eyes became ojos amarillos. When Capn mentioned his syntax was still the same he changed. When I mentioned he was dropping words unlike an Anglo he became Arifu.
It's not like he isn't responsive :)
”The Nibiru cataclysm is a supposed disastrous encounter between the Earth and a large planetary object (either a collision or a near-miss) which certain groups believe will take place in the early 21st century. Believers in this doomsday event usually refer to this object as Planet X or Nibiru. ”
Oh well...if the Earth is blasted to pieces, at least we don't have to hear Argentina whine anymore. Silver linings and all that ;)
Fantastic news again from the UN. The overwhelming support demonstrates once again Argentinas fine standing in the world, despite critics trying to convince us otherwise. This will certainly bring in some sound thinking in the UN.
Congratulations to Argentina and CFK.
Well, Argentina are about to spend the next 2 years making a fool out of themselves on the security council by talking about an imaginary group of islands beginning with M.
Every member of the UN deserves a seat in the non voting section of the security counsel. I think the rationale is if there are engrossed in real serious world matters, maybe the will shut the fuck up. Besides it's a rotational privilege, it's not like they have not been on it before. No veto power
Rwanda: Member of the Commonwealth of Nations - official policy to support the Falklands claim by the UK
Luxembourg: Member of the EU - official policy to follow EU law therefore support the Falklands claim by the UK
Republic of Korea: Regional Ally of the UK and also the US and therefore neutral in the Falklands issue due to other island claims regional to Korea itself
Conclusion: Argentina's on their own. Again. Whining. And wetting their pants. As usual.
What neighborhood? The invade countries preemetively and kill women and children neighborhood? All a bunch of criminals, those represented in that body
What am I saying? Based on the above, Argentina should fit right in then.
@18 Giorgio_O_Tsoukalos,
So you have read Voynich?
l take it you meant the Voynich Manuscript?
What do you make of it? l too, have read it.
l would be interested to know your conclusions.
This is not a trick question.
Forget our current squabble. Just concentrate on Voynich.
For myself, l am unsure.
lt sounds like a meaningless jumble of letters, except, why would anyone go to such lengths to produce nonsense.
l wonder if it is Tibetan, written with a European code.
Although l suppose the cryptanologists must have considered that.
Please reply.
I agree the UN can be seen as pointless on many levels but it keeps countries talking and working together, for that purpose alone it is worth supporting.
As for blaming the UN for the world's ills, it is like saying, 'Whenever there is a crime scene the police are always there' and implying the police are responsible. The UN act in a policing role.
In that respect they should be representative but as Argentina has just proved, some countries are not mature enough to look beyond their own borders. Their opening me, me, me stance will have set the tone for them to be tolerated and ignored.
Let's see what the UNSC have on their plate at the moment.
1. We have Syria in the middle of a brutal and bloody civil war.
2. We have Syria bombing Turkey, and Turkey retaliating, which is threatening to spiral out of control, and could pull other NATO countries in.
3. We have North Korea threatening to bomb South Korea.
4. We have Iran trying to acquire or build a nuclear weapon, and Israel threatening a pre-emptive strike against them if the do.
5. We have India and Pakistan (both nuclear powers) fighting over Kashmir which is always threatening to spiral out of control.
6. We have the problem of Somali pirates attacking international shipping and kidnapping people.
7. We have North and South Sudan fighting over oil.
8. And we have Argentina complaining about a sovereignty issue.
I wonder which one of these are not the responsibility of the UNSC but are in fact the responsibility of the International Court of Justice?
Send the answer to Timidman, c/o UN building in NYC.
It's time for Argentina to take a good look beyond its borders and realise what the UNSC are here to do. They have far bigger fish to fry, and are completely not interested in something that is not under their jurisdiction.
LEP, this is an actual link to things they've worked on, it overwhelms the RG cries over losing an island almost 200 years ago. I don't think they know there is serious things going on in the adult world.
Can one of you,Lep,poppy or Elaine,clarify for me whether UNSC is important or not.You seem to contradict each other while agreeing with each other.
What are you saying.
@13 We? A combined effort then? Do you get one word each? No wonder nothing makes sense. You are now on my Report abuse list.
@17 Argieland has temporarily joined the Security Council for a number of reasons. It was the only place stupid enough to want to display its idiocy on a more regular basis. Other Caribbean/South American countries have better things to do. It has been accepted on a similar basis to that used to give the cesspit a temporary seat in the G20. Argieland is in the G20 so that real countries could get an idea of what poor places think. Even if they have no equipment for the purpose of thinking.
@21 It's only so that a place that everyone thinks of a prat cesspit can PROVE it's a prat cesspit! I trust that that faggotland understands that it can't get involved in discussions about matters where it is involved. No mention of the Falklands, British militarisation of the South Atlantic, South Georgia, South Sandwich Islands, British Antarctic Territory. All off-limits. So make sure you keep your dozy mouth SHUT!
The two biggest issues that the UN faces is the Israeli occupation of Palestine, and the decline of the EU economies as a result of businesses going over to China for bigger profits and less maintenance costs.
I disagree, these are not the 2 biggest issues facing the UNSC.
The 1st one falls under the Security Council, but the second, i.e. the economy, is for the general assembly.
Israel and Palestine are being encouraged to talk and find a solution, but most of the other situations listed are potential wars that could flare up at any moment and spread killing thousands.
Only in the past 24hrs North Korea has threatened to target a tourist area (not a legitimate military target) in South Korea.
If they did that, then South Korea would respond by attacking legitimate targets in North Korea. The situation could spiral quickly out of control.
These types of incidents are the most important issues for the security council to address. Argentina's attempt to abuse their position on the security council by bringing up a subject that is totally inappropriate for that forum (unless they are planning on starting a war over the Falklands), is pathetic, self-centered, and they should be slapped down if they try it again.
#37....I don't think that is the UN's two big concerns in at all....the first most definitely, the second is free market shifts that's been happening in the USA for years, get use to it.
The entire middle east it the priority for the UNSC and North Korea grabbing and shaking it's peanut sized balls in the wind. Then trying to stabilize Somalia, and prevent nuclear weapons in the middle east.
mmmmm
Either way gentlemen,
We are living in an evermore dangerous world, that [it seems]
Will end the only way, we humans ever end anything?
[War]
Just a thought .
Hate to break it to you, but non of your dirge is any of our concern. If it is your concern, then perhaps there is a problem with your country. Either it gets involved where no one the fucked asked, or it has a lot of haters.
Either option is pretty telling about your society.
I think 42 the RGs only see this as a conduit fro rattling on about the Falklands, and not a chance to do good for the world. why on earth would they want to do that, it's all smoke and mirrors to cover up rampant inflation and impounded flag ships.
@38 Difficult to think of more national murderers than argieland.
@42 You do realise that your comment is worthless, asinine and pointless. As are all 'argie'commems.
LEP...the RG's got it in there tiny brain that they can make the Falklands an issue. Statements are already being made that the SC has no tolerance for the Falklands concern of theirs.
Titti boi TTT always changes is ID's (I would too if I supported cuntina kirchner) but his rants remain the same.
Is there anyone in this room who does not speak with such contempt for my country? Personally I'm not proud of my representatives, but beyond that, I'm very proud of my country, Argentina. Here live many honest and good people. And you, whoever you are, have no authority to cast the first stone. And I clarify (in case anyone has any doubt), I'm an Argentine citizen who believes strongly that the Falklands belong to their inhabitants.
It is sad to read how those who speak here with as much haughtiness, have dedicated (in fact.... and you know that perfectly well) for centuries, to steal, conquer, enslave and kill everything in their path. We may be decaying before your eyes (even the world) but, I have something for sure, you are not much better (just check your past). Argentina is a young nation, with plenty of time to keep making mistakes. Governments are temporary, people always stays.
Fortunately, I have met many friends from the UK, and also people of the Falklands, who are wonderful people. And that was enough for me to don't make the same mistake that YOU're doing... generalize.
Peace to all. I hope you can understand my message. I really hope it. Greetings
@49 I have many Argentine friends expressing similar sentiments.
Don't take a message board so personally. The majority of people here don't like your government - the lying, stealing and driving your economy off a cliff - nothing against regular Argentines.
Zoomatt, you should not get so upset by posters here. It stems from the policies of your government. But do not speak of historical actions as we all need to speak in the present. You say you are a young country, do you believe you are younger than the United States? Both continents and countries were sown from the same seed around the same time.
My wive is a portena, I would like to see more for ARgenitna than what CFK is doing. Today they are debating stealing land from people that worked hard and saved and now have it taken. Just as they stole her pension money.
Thank you for answer, people! (ElaineB, Captain Poppy). That's the kind of answer I needed to read. Sorry about my sensitivity. I love my country and would like another kind of government. This is not the time, I guess. But I hope that things can change with our next president.
everyone seems to think you have mutiple under cover names such as Truth_Telling_MickeyMouse aka Giorgio_O._Tsoukalos aka Arifu_Gobakuwi aka Tobias - so who is Christan Gamon from Paraguay?
does anyone know what overwhelming support means?Lol
Anything overwhelming couldn't include brits.
#55 Next president? yea! menem, vidella or galtiery lol maybe just maybe you can vote for bush! CFK got you out of IMF. Why don't you just go back to europe sound like you would be a great boot polisher in the exterior, you already lick them really good, USA loves cheap Mexican labour an Argentine can be just as good. To hope for another president first you must have more then one good candidate, as it stands if elections where to be held tomorrow even if you didn't like CFK you will have to admit she is the best Argentina has, Venezuela had the same dilemma. Three time in a row.
I'm impressed with you two, young ones !
Both of you have read the Voynich Manuscript !
I couldn't even get through the first page!.... Nice pictures though ;-)
Argentina ran unopposed. If you hadn't got overwhelming support it would've been amusing.
Yet Argentina need to remember that the are not given a seat on the UNSC to forward their own political agenda, they are their to represent the interests of South America and the Caribbean, and of course, the world.
Bleating on selfishly about the Falklands will only see them sidelined as rhe rest of the world have bigger problems to resolve.
What world are you living in? Why do you hold others to standards your country has never and will never live up to? The UK not one time in its history has done anything representing other's interests. If there is no political, monetary or territorial gain for you, not your problem.
Who are you to talk to us like that? Remember your origins. They precluded you from opening your mouth about morality, fairness, or international respect. Did you arrest Tony Blair yet? Did you read what Annan says in his book about the legality of the Iraq war.
Of course not, you are a member of the SKK (Security Kangoroo Council), you are Kangoroo #2, the lap-dog behind the USA (never have stood up to them, ever), and you accuse other countries of lacking decorum.
The UK? Last time I checked it was Germany, France, and Italy that put most of the funds as Euro-zone members. The UK washed their hands. Thanks for bringing that up, bolsters my:
The UK not one time in its history has done anything representing other's interests. If there is no political, monetary or territorial gain for you, not your problem
64#Lep.
Bleating on selfishly about the Falklands will only see them sidelined as rhe rest of the world have bigger problems to resolve.
You are correct in respect of the UK.they have most problems to resolve with the decolonisation committee and most conflicts in the world today arise from the uk's empire carve-up of the world.
yulena, being one of the few thinking mestizo or castizo blogging. What happens when the so called colonies do not what to disassociate with the so called ”colononizers? What does the UN then do, force de-colononization anyway? According the the sub committe, their role is to assist colonies in declaring independence and assuming self governing. I do not see how the Falklands at all fits into this category whatsoever. But I am an American and I am sure you will concur, what do I know, we were the original colonies.
@62 Think,
Let me clarify that Cher Think.
What l meant to say, oh pedantic one, is that l have read a book, called the Voynich Manuscript written by G.Kennedy & R.Churchill.
lt is all about the V.M.
No-one can actually read the manuscript yet. That is the whole point.
lt seems either to be in an unknown language, or a code that no-one has been able to break. Or it is complete nonsense. We don't know.
Now there's a nice little project for your active brain Cher Think.
l should think that a well versed, well travelled, experienced man of the world such as yourself would have very little trouble in deciphering the V.M.♥
Please share the results with me, when you've finally cracked it.
(Hint: some of the letters look Tibetan to me).
Isolde read the Devon gazette you might learn something there .
Poppy perhaps being an original coloniser you can answer your own question.As for the 'O T' of the British,the U N de-colonisation com,has past resolutions for the British to follow a certain course.They choose not to do that or to grant independance to territories who are unable to mount an anti-colonial liberation war as your country deemed to be justified.
In my humble, manly opinion that manuscript is not other than a typical hoax from the Middle Ages…….
There are hundreds of similar “Mystical Manuscripts” from that period that fetched very good prices at the time.
In line with all those hundred of thousand Middle Eastern “Reliques” containing a splinter of Jesus Christ Cross…..
Or those magical “Unicorn Horn” artifacts fabricated by cunning Scandinavian craftsmen out of Narwhal tusks that went for incredible fortunes in the old days, especially to English buyers ;-)
What ”colonies: want independence from UK? Hell,we want to unload the roachs of Puerto Rico but they refuse to leave our support, ....any suggestions how we can get rid of PR?
you talking again titti boi.....I see cuntina kirchner ordered the sea scouts off the libertad. I hope they brought money for a hotel or airfare. America does not want PR....they want us. If you were a rican your would know that
@73 Think,
Yes, that is one possible solution which is mentioned in the book.
A weakness though, would be that there are no other forgeries of a similar nature, or so the book says.
Some of the best Cryptoanalysists have worked on the VM, but they haven't put forward that it is part of a larger pool of fakes.
lt seems to stand alone.
Another possibility is that its author was insane. Who really knows?
Well, if you don't know Think, then who could we possibly turn to? :-))))))
btw- those Unicorn horns that are in private hands/museums would be worth quite a lot of money now.
Good thing they weren't made by Argentines, you'd be wanting them backor recovered.
Thats the way, we're free & easy with our money, Think.
Not many things for Cryptanalysts to write books about since the Rosseta stone and the Enigma Machine…….
No wonder they keep their cards thight……….
As our British Resident Book Author, Good Friend and Staunch Malvinas supporter Mr. Redhoyt aka Mr. Lorton rightly would put it….:
“Just another person with just another book to sell….”
So what you are saying Cher Think, is that you don't know?
l'm flabberghasted, floored, flumoxed & far from home.
There is something that you don't know? Mon Dieu.
I guess one indian to another for the PR's .....show me the votes that they wanted other than the USA Navy out and wanted to be a nation? The vote is 11/6/12...and the votes are about pro statehood, which no American wants as well as the PR's. The vast majority of PR's want the status quo as is.
At 10.00 hrs Monday Timmidman is going to start his historical (or hysterical – depending on your point of view) diatribe to the UNSC regarding the Malvinas (wherever they are) and the despicable Ghanaians who have conspired with the ‘vulture funds located in British Territory' and threatened the lives of the sailors and cadets.
At 10.02 the Chairman of the UNSC will stop Timmidman and remind him that he must base his claims on the truth otherwise their will be a motion of censure against AG.
At 10.03 after further ranting from Timmidman, the Chairman will politely ask him to ‘Urinate as he leaves the building’ there’s a good fellow.
(Timings may alter to take into account the crying of Timmidman into his hankie)
Guzz.....are all mestizo as thick as you? Those, again in big letters ARE ABOUT STATEHOOD. STATEHOOD HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INDEPENDENCE AS A SOVEREIGN NATION. That vast majority want it the way it is and the USA is saying statehood or leave and the PR's are doing neither.
PR wants the best of both worlds. For decades, the question of Puerto Rico's status has been hotly and actively debated, with dominant local political parties organized according to a relationship-to-the-U.S. ideology. For 40 years, the political leadership of the island has see-sawed between those who support statehood and those who support continuation of the commonwealth, with roughly 10% of the population supporting independence.
The problem with the polls, they never ask for EITHER statehood or independence. The vast majority of PR's twant the status quo, the vast majority of American want to stop the flow or roaches: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-14/obama-wants-puerto-rico-to-decide-statehood-or-independence-1-.html
Independence is such a miniscule sector. In 1946, Gilberto Concepción de Gracia founded the Puerto Rican Independence Party (PIP), which continues to participate in the island's electoral process. The party has elected some legislative candidates, but has yet to win more than a few percentage points of the vote in gubernatorial elections (2.04% in 2008) or the legislative elections (4.5-5% of the island-wide legislative vote in 2008) There has only been 3 previous votes; 1967, 1993 and 1998 and the next...this November. Each time remaining a commonwealth status overwhelming wins by over 60 and independence gains less than 5% of the votes. Even the ”Independent Party only has 4% of the legislative seats. We do not WANT PR why the hell do you think we get having them vote? If you are the best mestizo's have.......no wonder you are fading, too stupid to know how to repopulate! Argue a point when you understand and know the facts.
Again for the fourth time it's on the ballot. # questions 1-keep the commonwealth 2- Become a state 3- become an independent nation. The 98 vote only 2.5 % wanted to be independent. Needless to say we where very upset. We really want them on there on, no one wants latin roaches, they are inbreed half breeds and collect welfare.....here, argentina should take them. They don't work and are happy with government handouts! Should fit right in with the peronist
Assuming you read my response you must mean me personally? What kind of a fool minded question is that? I want them out! I am tired of supporting them on welfare. They can't support themselves yet they are always flying back and forth to PR.
November 11th. And the same questions will be presented as in 1998, 1993 and 1967........Do you want to stay a commonwealth (territory), do you want to be a US State, or do you want to be a independent nation. As I said, the movenment to be an indepedent nation has never really moved beyond 4% of the population which is reflected in the elected officials as they as hold less than 4% of the elected seats and offices in all of PR.
Poppy.Were you glad to be diverted to PR issue,and back to your racist,used and abuse heroe profile.If the USA,who took in PR,pulled out of PR,how much do you think you would save.Nothing I'd guess,because you are not significant in the whole picture,you just over-value yourself.
Do you think the UK would pull-out of any of their overseas territories if they were a drain on the UK purse?
Thats for the name Yulena......I'm truly honored by your profile of me....again, always an assumption. Now have I ever stated I am significant to the marco view? Please point me to that post? But then again it would depoend on what the macro view is that is being viewed.
Guzz, 11/6....my typo.
On a simluar note......RG's relaize that they cannot send an aircraft to fly the crew home and are asking neighbors for help......lol Chile offered but RG's are not all that thrilled and asked Brazil for help. What do they say about beggars? Oh yes, they can't be choosers, but RG's do not know that.
They was going to send Tango One as is it immune.....but it is being repaired.......IN THE USA......lol
It's really comical to read.
Poppy you kid yourself a lot don't you.Watch today prez debate and post your view as to who wins before the pundits do.We can see how accurate you are or are you not up for that.
Is cuntina debating someone.....I hear she's a master debater....I saw a video!
I suppose some people need a presidential debate winner to know whom they are voting for. What is your point, you know, I am a gringo and thick headed.......only good for gun toting the the central american countries...that's all we are good for.....ya'll know?
Poppy
Have a go at it while you can. Nicaragua is with us and soon the others as well. Your grip on Mexico might be tight, but the will of the people is stronger...
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesAwful.
Oct 18th, 2012 - 10:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0There goes the neighbourhood...............
Oct 18th, 2012 - 10:59 pm - Link - Report abuse 0What neighborhood? The invade countries preemetively and kill women and children neighborhood? All a bunch of criminals, those represented in that body. fact... I would be ashamed to belong to those countries.
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:01 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Guess who Giorgio_O._Tsoukalos is.
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:12 pm - Link - Report abuse 0caliginous abysses, iconoclast
I simply want to withdraw from the UN and the OAS., leave the UN. It is shameful we belong to that organization.
remove the slime of being associated with an organization which has your country as a member
Truth_Telling_MickeyMouse aka Giorgio_O._Tsoukalos aka Arifu_Gobakuwi aka Tobias - all from the Mendoza province.
TTM(T)/A_G/G_O_T/Toby_el_Menduco: What is the origin of the word colony?
Of course you get an overwhelming result if you are they only one in the race.
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:14 pm - Link - Report abuse 0But I suppose it might distract a few citizens for a while.
Meanwhile, instead of representing the whole of South America, Argentina kicks off with a tirade about something that has nothing to do with the people they're meant to be representing.
I find it funny that they mention that they want to bring about the end of colonialism. Does this mean that they've decided to stop trying to colonise the Falklands?
@5
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:18 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Thanks for changing my mind.
When you said represent the whole of South America, you made me think. Represent for what purpose? with what goal? With which tools?
What do the non-permanent members do? Exactly.
So, might as well make a mockery of it. I hope Argentina does, becaue the UN SecCo deserves no respect.
we hope the rest of them carry headache pills.
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:23 pm - Link - Report abuse 0they are going to need them.
Argentina on the security council? I see the UN is less and less prestigious. Anybody who would want anything to do with a garbage country like this one, where crime is spiraling out of control, and know NOTHING about security, honestly or anything that is not corrupt and destructive is crazy!
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:27 pm - Link - Report abuse 0What prestige? They got the UK and USA in there? Who broke the very rule that created the UN in the first place! To start a war of preemption!
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The truth sucks eh? Your country is morally garbage.
we agree
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:34 pm - Link - Report abuse 0and argentina should be thrown out.
@10
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:35 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Please?
He changes his thing based on earlier discussions with you guys. The mention of yellow eyes became ojos amarillos. When Capn mentioned his syntax was still the same he changed. When I mentioned he was dropping words unlike an Anglo he became Arifu.
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:39 pm - Link - Report abuse 0It's not like he isn't responsive :)
Elio OjOs Amarillos has a far longer history than you can imagine. As did Arifu Gobakuwi (and this Idlehands can VOUCH for being the truth).
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:42 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You are welcome to google them.
You believe I was joking when I said you have no idea who we are. At your own peril.
May Nabiru be our lodestar to our Hele vimanas.
Tobi, are you a Scientologist? ;)
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:47 pm - Link - Report abuse 0I don't know. I am not Tobias. Ask him (he's up there with the Annunaki).
Oct 18th, 2012 - 11:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0”The Nibiru cataclysm is a supposed disastrous encounter between the Earth and a large planetary object (either a collision or a near-miss) which certain groups believe will take place in the early 21st century. Believers in this doomsday event usually refer to this object as Planet X or Nibiru. ”
Oct 19th, 2012 - 12:01 am - Link - Report abuse 0Oh well...if the Earth is blasted to pieces, at least we don't have to hear Argentina whine anymore. Silver linings and all that ;)
Fantastic news again from the UN. The overwhelming support demonstrates once again Argentinas fine standing in the world, despite critics trying to convince us otherwise. This will certainly bring in some sound thinking in the UN.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 12:05 am - Link - Report abuse 0Congratulations to Argentina and CFK.
You would have no idea. But I have read Voynich.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 12:07 am - Link - Report abuse 0Hele, hele, lamat zabac ta ni.
Wingardium Leviosa!
Oct 19th, 2012 - 12:12 am - Link - Report abuse 0It looks like the TTT has really flipped this time.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 12:20 am - Link - Report abuse 0Poor little boy.
BTW, threats from someone with serious psychiatric problems is supposed to worry us, get real.
I thought nobody liked Argentina...
Oct 19th, 2012 - 12:35 am - Link - Report abuse 0Well, Argentina are about to spend the next 2 years making a fool out of themselves on the security council by talking about an imaginary group of islands beginning with M.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 01:08 am - Link - Report abuse 0Every member of the UN deserves a seat in the non voting section of the security counsel. I think the rationale is if there are engrossed in real serious world matters, maybe the will shut the fuck up. Besides it's a rotational privilege, it's not like they have not been on it before. No veto power
Oct 19th, 2012 - 01:26 am - Link - Report abuse 0'overwhelming support'????? I don't think there was a vote as they were the only country in SA that put their hand up.......
Oct 19th, 2012 - 02:06 am - Link - Report abuse 0Rwanda: Member of the Commonwealth of Nations - official policy to support the Falklands claim by the UK
Oct 19th, 2012 - 06:02 am - Link - Report abuse 0Luxembourg: Member of the EU - official policy to follow EU law therefore support the Falklands claim by the UK
Republic of Korea: Regional Ally of the UK and also the US and therefore neutral in the Falklands issue due to other island claims regional to Korea itself
Conclusion: Argentina's on their own. Again. Whining. And wetting their pants. As usual.
3 Giorgio_O._Tsoukalos
Oct 19th, 2012 - 06:12 am - Link - Report abuse 0What neighborhood? The invade countries preemetively and kill women and children neighborhood? All a bunch of criminals, those represented in that body
What am I saying? Based on the above, Argentina should fit right in then.
@18 Giorgio_O_Tsoukalos,
Oct 19th, 2012 - 08:45 am - Link - Report abuse 0So you have read Voynich?
l take it you meant the Voynich Manuscript?
What do you make of it? l too, have read it.
l would be interested to know your conclusions.
This is not a trick question.
Forget our current squabble. Just concentrate on Voynich.
For myself, l am unsure.
lt sounds like a meaningless jumble of letters, except, why would anyone go to such lengths to produce nonsense.
l wonder if it is Tibetan, written with a European code.
Although l suppose the cryptanologists must have considered that.
Please reply.
I agree the UN can be seen as pointless on many levels but it keeps countries talking and working together, for that purpose alone it is worth supporting.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 08:51 am - Link - Report abuse 0As for blaming the UN for the world's ills, it is like saying, 'Whenever there is a crime scene the police are always there' and implying the police are responsible. The UN act in a policing role.
In that respect they should be representative but as Argentina has just proved, some countries are not mature enough to look beyond their own borders. Their opening me, me, me stance will have set the tone for them to be tolerated and ignored.
Another own goal, Timmerman. I like that man. : )
@28 - ElaineB
Oct 19th, 2012 - 09:18 am - Link - Report abuse 0I agree.
Let's see what the UNSC have on their plate at the moment.
1. We have Syria in the middle of a brutal and bloody civil war.
2. We have Syria bombing Turkey, and Turkey retaliating, which is threatening to spiral out of control, and could pull other NATO countries in.
3. We have North Korea threatening to bomb South Korea.
4. We have Iran trying to acquire or build a nuclear weapon, and Israel threatening a pre-emptive strike against them if the do.
5. We have India and Pakistan (both nuclear powers) fighting over Kashmir which is always threatening to spiral out of control.
6. We have the problem of Somali pirates attacking international shipping and kidnapping people.
7. We have North and South Sudan fighting over oil.
8. And we have Argentina complaining about a sovereignty issue.
I wonder which one of these are not the responsibility of the UNSC but are in fact the responsibility of the International Court of Justice?
Send the answer to Timidman, c/o UN building in NYC.
It's time for Argentina to take a good look beyond its borders and realise what the UNSC are here to do. They have far bigger fish to fry, and are completely not interested in something that is not under their jurisdiction.
don't forget China and Japan squabbling over a set of uninhabited islands. Rgenweener go to the back of the queue.....again.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 09:23 am - Link - Report abuse 0LEP, this is an actual link to things they've worked on, it overwhelms the RG cries over losing an island almost 200 years ago. I don't think they know there is serious things going on in the adult world.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 11:54 am - Link - Report abuse 0http://www.un.org/en/sc/documents/resolutions/2012.shtml
Argentina will spend all her time complaining abt the Falklands,
Oct 19th, 2012 - 12:02 pm - Link - Report abuse 0All 29 LEPRecon ,,,,,,, listings above will be met at each stage with, what abt the Falklands,
Yes we know abt Syria, but the Falklands are ours.
We don’t care if Iran gets the bomb, the Falklands are ours.
In two years time, the might be calling it the united asylum seekers anemones,
Or nutters united.lol.
cripes what will they say if one of the SC tests some self defence missles with a range of 4miles......meltdown
Oct 19th, 2012 - 12:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Can one of you,Lep,poppy or Elaine,clarify for me whether UNSC is important or not.You seem to contradict each other while agreeing with each other.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 12:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0What are you saying.
@13 We? A combined effort then? Do you get one word each? No wonder nothing makes sense. You are now on my Report abuse list.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 12:38 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@17 Argieland has temporarily joined the Security Council for a number of reasons. It was the only place stupid enough to want to display its idiocy on a more regular basis. Other Caribbean/South American countries have better things to do. It has been accepted on a similar basis to that used to give the cesspit a temporary seat in the G20. Argieland is in the G20 so that real countries could get an idea of what poor places think. Even if they have no equipment for the purpose of thinking.
@21 It's only so that a place that everyone thinks of a prat cesspit can PROVE it's a prat cesspit! I trust that that faggotland understands that it can't get involved in discussions about matters where it is involved. No mention of the Falklands, British militarisation of the South Atlantic, South Georgia, South Sandwich Islands, British Antarctic Territory. All off-limits. So make sure you keep your dozy mouth SHUT!
if one was british, one would understand it perfectly
Oct 19th, 2012 - 01:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The two biggest issues that the UN faces is the Israeli occupation of Palestine, and the decline of the EU economies as a result of businesses going over to China for bigger profits and less maintenance costs.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 01:16 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Veto power should disappear!!. And 3 Giorgio_O._Tsoukalos more murderers than the English there, ask Iraqi to name just one example!!greetings :)
Oct 19th, 2012 - 01:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@37 - THEMan
Oct 19th, 2012 - 01:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0I disagree, these are not the 2 biggest issues facing the UNSC.
The 1st one falls under the Security Council, but the second, i.e. the economy, is for the general assembly.
Israel and Palestine are being encouraged to talk and find a solution, but most of the other situations listed are potential wars that could flare up at any moment and spread killing thousands.
Only in the past 24hrs North Korea has threatened to target a tourist area (not a legitimate military target) in South Korea.
If they did that, then South Korea would respond by attacking legitimate targets in North Korea. The situation could spiral quickly out of control.
These types of incidents are the most important issues for the security council to address. Argentina's attempt to abuse their position on the security council by bringing up a subject that is totally inappropriate for that forum (unless they are planning on starting a war over the Falklands), is pathetic, self-centered, and they should be slapped down if they try it again.
Argentina, take your case to the ICJ or STFU.
#37....I don't think that is the UN's two big concerns in at all....the first most definitely, the second is free market shifts that's been happening in the USA for years, get use to it.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 01:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The entire middle east it the priority for the UNSC and North Korea grabbing and shaking it's peanut sized balls in the wind. Then trying to stabilize Somalia, and prevent nuclear weapons in the middle east.
mmmmm
Oct 19th, 2012 - 01:58 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Either way gentlemen,
We are living in an evermore dangerous world, that [it seems]
Will end the only way, we humans ever end anything?
[War]
Just a thought .
@29
Oct 19th, 2012 - 02:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Hate to break it to you, but non of your dirge is any of our concern. If it is your concern, then perhaps there is a problem with your country. Either it gets involved where no one the fucked asked, or it has a lot of haters.
Either option is pretty telling about your society.
@42 as a member of the SC it now IS your concern idiot
Oct 19th, 2012 - 03:11 pm - Link - Report abuse 0slattzzz GOT is TTT so don't expect logical linkage.....lol
Oct 19th, 2012 - 03:14 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@43 - slattzzz
Oct 19th, 2012 - 03:17 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You got in before me.
But I forgot, Tobias wants Argentina to be completely isolated from the world.
@42 - GOT
If its not Argentina's concern then they should resign from the SC, shouldn't they? What they shouldn't be doing is abusing their position.
Take it to the ICJ.
Oh wait, Argentina won't do that as you don't have a valid claim to the Falklands and know you would lose.
I think 42 the RGs only see this as a conduit fro rattling on about the Falklands, and not a chance to do good for the world. why on earth would they want to do that, it's all smoke and mirrors to cover up rampant inflation and impounded flag ships.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 04:29 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Same old same old TTT
@38 Difficult to think of more national murderers than argieland.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 05:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@42 You do realise that your comment is worthless, asinine and pointless. As are all 'argie'commems.
#38 to you it should.....but it won't.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 06:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0LEP...the RG's got it in there tiny brain that they can make the Falklands an issue. Statements are already being made that the SC has no tolerance for the Falklands concern of theirs.
Titti boi TTT always changes is ID's (I would too if I supported cuntina kirchner) but his rants remain the same.
Is there anyone in this room who does not speak with such contempt for my country? Personally I'm not proud of my representatives, but beyond that, I'm very proud of my country, Argentina. Here live many honest and good people. And you, whoever you are, have no authority to cast the first stone. And I clarify (in case anyone has any doubt), I'm an Argentine citizen who believes strongly that the Falklands belong to their inhabitants.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 07:04 pm - Link - Report abuse 0It is sad to read how those who speak here with as much haughtiness, have dedicated (in fact.... and you know that perfectly well) for centuries, to steal, conquer, enslave and kill everything in their path. We may be decaying before your eyes (even the world) but, I have something for sure, you are not much better (just check your past). Argentina is a young nation, with plenty of time to keep making mistakes. Governments are temporary, people always stays.
Fortunately, I have met many friends from the UK, and also people of the Falklands, who are wonderful people. And that was enough for me to don't make the same mistake that YOU're doing... generalize.
Peace to all. I hope you can understand my message. I really hope it. Greetings
@49 I have many Argentine friends expressing similar sentiments.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 07:46 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Don't take a message board so personally. The majority of people here don't like your government - the lying, stealing and driving your economy off a cliff - nothing against regular Argentines.
@50
Oct 19th, 2012 - 07:58 pm - Link - Report abuse 0same in the UK Skru da Kueen
Zoomatt, you should not get so upset by posters here. It stems from the policies of your government. But do not speak of historical actions as we all need to speak in the present. You say you are a young country, do you believe you are younger than the United States? Both continents and countries were sown from the same seed around the same time.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 08:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0My wive is a portena, I would like to see more for ARgenitna than what CFK is doing. Today they are debating stealing land from people that worked hard and saved and now have it taken. Just as they stole her pension money.
TRILLIONS in debt, over half to pensionists, and Argentina steals people's pension... You can't see the woods for all the trees..
Oct 19th, 2012 - 08:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0you make no sense guzz. Why did you leave south america for europe....see the end?
Oct 19th, 2012 - 08:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Thank you for answer, people! (ElaineB, Captain Poppy). That's the kind of answer I needed to read. Sorry about my sensitivity. I love my country and would like another kind of government. This is not the time, I guess. But I hope that things can change with our next president.
Oct 19th, 2012 - 09:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0ZooMatt, do not let her get another term. Get out there on November 8th
Oct 19th, 2012 - 11:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0No, Argentina doesn' give a fark about any of those other issues. Next question?
Oct 20th, 2012 - 12:58 am - Link - Report abuse 0Giorgio_O._Tsoukalos
Oct 20th, 2012 - 02:14 am - Link - Report abuse 0everyone seems to think you have mutiple under cover names such as Truth_Telling_MickeyMouse aka Giorgio_O._Tsoukalos aka Arifu_Gobakuwi aka Tobias - so who is Christan Gamon from Paraguay?
We are everywhere. The Annunaki.
Oct 20th, 2012 - 03:30 am - Link - Report abuse 0does anyone know what overwhelming support means?Lol
Oct 20th, 2012 - 08:41 am - Link - Report abuse 0Anything overwhelming couldn't include brits.
#55 Next president? yea! menem, vidella or galtiery lol maybe just maybe you can vote for bush! CFK got you out of IMF. Why don't you just go back to europe sound like you would be a great boot polisher in the exterior, you already lick them really good, USA loves cheap Mexican labour an Argentine can be just as good. To hope for another president first you must have more then one good candidate, as it stands if elections where to be held tomorrow even if you didn't like CFK you will have to admit she is the best Argentina has, Venezuela had the same dilemma. Three time in a row.
60
Oct 20th, 2012 - 08:57 am - Link - Report abuse 0That's the reason your arse twitches?
(18) Tobias & (27) lsolde
Oct 20th, 2012 - 09:54 am - Link - Report abuse 0I'm impressed with you two, young ones !
Both of you have read the Voynich Manuscript !
I couldn't even get through the first page!.... Nice pictures though ;-)
http://archive.org/stream/TheVoynichManuscript/Voynich_Manuscript#page/n1/mode/2up
60
Oct 20th, 2012 - 09:56 am - Link - Report abuse 0Truly sorry for that, your for their, of course :)
@60 - PH
Oct 20th, 2012 - 11:33 am - Link - Report abuse 0Argentina ran unopposed. If you hadn't got overwhelming support it would've been amusing.
Yet Argentina need to remember that the are not given a seat on the UNSC to forward their own political agenda, they are their to represent the interests of South America and the Caribbean, and of course, the world.
Bleating on selfishly about the Falklands will only see them sidelined as rhe rest of the world have bigger problems to resolve.
What world are you living in? Why do you hold others to standards your country has never and will never live up to? The UK not one time in its history has done anything representing other's interests. If there is no political, monetary or territorial gain for you, not your problem.
Oct 20th, 2012 - 01:45 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Who are you to talk to us like that? Remember your origins. They precluded you from opening your mouth about morality, fairness, or international respect. Did you arrest Tony Blair yet? Did you read what Annan says in his book about the legality of the Iraq war.
Of course not, you are a member of the SKK (Security Kangoroo Council), you are Kangoroo #2, the lap-dog behind the USA (never have stood up to them, ever), and you accuse other countries of lacking decorum.
You are inverecund.
65 Giorgio_O._Tsoukalos
Oct 20th, 2012 - 02:05 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Typical fcuking Greek, bleating all the while the UK pay for him to survive.
Without the UK handing out money to every deadbeat we would be much better off.
@66
Oct 20th, 2012 - 02:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The UK? Last time I checked it was Germany, France, and Italy that put most of the funds as Euro-zone members. The UK washed their hands. Thanks for bringing that up, bolsters my:
The UK not one time in its history has done anything representing other's interests. If there is no political, monetary or territorial gain for you, not your problem
64#Lep.
Oct 20th, 2012 - 03:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Bleating on selfishly about the Falklands will only see them sidelined as rhe rest of the world have bigger problems to resolve.
You are correct in respect of the UK.they have most problems to resolve with the decolonisation committee and most conflicts in the world today arise from the uk's empire carve-up of the world.
@68 Yulena
Oct 20th, 2012 - 07:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Stop whining like a women about the big bad UK and grow a pair FFS.
yulena, being one of the few thinking mestizo or castizo blogging. What happens when the so called colonies do not what to disassociate with the so called ”colononizers? What does the UN then do, force de-colononization anyway? According the the sub committe, their role is to assist colonies in declaring independence and assuming self governing. I do not see how the Falklands at all fits into this category whatsoever. But I am an American and I am sure you will concur, what do I know, we were the original colonies.
Oct 20th, 2012 - 08:14 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@62 Think,
Oct 20th, 2012 - 08:55 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Let me clarify that Cher Think.
What l meant to say, oh pedantic one, is that l have read a book, called the Voynich Manuscript written by G.Kennedy & R.Churchill.
lt is all about the V.M.
No-one can actually read the manuscript yet. That is the whole point.
lt seems either to be in an unknown language, or a code that no-one has been able to break. Or it is complete nonsense. We don't know.
Now there's a nice little project for your active brain Cher Think.
l should think that a well versed, well travelled, experienced man of the world such as yourself would have very little trouble in deciphering the V.M.♥
Please share the results with me, when you've finally cracked it.
(Hint: some of the letters look Tibetan to me).
Isolde read the Devon gazette you might learn something there .
Oct 20th, 2012 - 10:10 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Poppy perhaps being an original coloniser you can answer your own question.As for the 'O T' of the British,the U N de-colonisation com,has past resolutions for the British to follow a certain course.They choose not to do that or to grant independance to territories who are unable to mount an anti-colonial liberation war as your country deemed to be justified.
(71) Sorry Cher Isolde but…………..
Oct 20th, 2012 - 10:30 pm - Link - Report abuse 0In my humble, manly opinion that manuscript is not other than a typical hoax from the Middle Ages…….
There are hundreds of similar “Mystical Manuscripts” from that period that fetched very good prices at the time.
In line with all those hundred of thousand Middle Eastern “Reliques” containing a splinter of Jesus Christ Cross…..
Or those magical “Unicorn Horn” artifacts fabricated by cunning Scandinavian craftsmen out of Narwhal tusks that went for incredible fortunes in the old days, especially to English buyers ;-)
What ”colonies: want independence from UK? Hell,we want to unload the roachs of Puerto Rico but they refuse to leave our support, ....any suggestions how we can get rid of PR?
Oct 21st, 2012 - 01:15 am - Link - Report abuse 0@74
Oct 21st, 2012 - 01:19 am - Link - Report abuse 0How about, by leaving?
you talking again titti boi.....I see cuntina kirchner ordered the sea scouts off the libertad. I hope they brought money for a hotel or airfare. America does not want PR....they want us. If you were a rican your would know that
Oct 21st, 2012 - 03:14 am - Link - Report abuse 0@73 Think,
Oct 21st, 2012 - 07:00 am - Link - Report abuse 0Yes, that is one possible solution which is mentioned in the book.
A weakness though, would be that there are no other forgeries of a similar nature, or so the book says.
Some of the best Cryptoanalysists have worked on the VM, but they haven't put forward that it is part of a larger pool of fakes.
lt seems to stand alone.
Another possibility is that its author was insane. Who really knows?
Well, if you don't know Think, then who could we possibly turn to? :-))))))
btw- those Unicorn horns that are in private hands/museums would be worth quite a lot of money now.
Good thing they weren't made by Argentines, you'd be wanting them backor recovered.
Thats the way, we're free & easy with our money, Think.
(77) Cher “free & easy” Isolde…..
Oct 21st, 2012 - 07:57 am - Link - Report abuse 0Not many things for Cryptanalysts to write books about since the Rosseta stone and the Enigma Machine…….
No wonder they keep their cards thight……….
As our British Resident Book Author, Good Friend and Staunch Malvinas supporter Mr. Redhoyt aka Mr. Lorton rightly would put it….:
“Just another person with just another book to sell….”
Poppy
Oct 21st, 2012 - 08:12 am - Link - Report abuse 0The puertoricans have voted on seceral occasions that they DON'T want to be part of USA, yet you make them vote again and again...
So what you are saying Cher Think, is that you don't know?
Oct 21st, 2012 - 10:31 am - Link - Report abuse 0l'm flabberghasted, floored, flumoxed & far from home.
There is something that you don't know? Mon Dieu.
(80) lsolde
Oct 21st, 2012 - 12:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You say:
l'm flabberghasted, floored, flumoxed & far from home.
I say:
I know..................., I know.
That's the effect I have on most women.......
;-)
I guess one indian to another for the PR's .....show me the votes that they wanted other than the USA Navy out and wanted to be a nation? The vote is 11/6/12...and the votes are about pro statehood, which no American wants as well as the PR's. The vast majority of PR's want the status quo as is.
Oct 21st, 2012 - 03:29 pm - Link - Report abuse 01967
Oct 21st, 2012 - 03:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/puertorico/rejects.htm
Puerto Ricans votes AGAINST statehood
1993
http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/puertorico/rejects.htm
Puerto Ricans votes AGAINST statehood
1998
http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/puertorico/rejects.htm
Puerto Ricans votes AGAINST statehood
But what the heck, let them vote until they vote right, right?
What else to expect from your twisted edition of democracy...
At 10.00 hrs Monday Timmidman is going to start his historical (or hysterical – depending on your point of view) diatribe to the UNSC regarding the Malvinas (wherever they are) and the despicable Ghanaians who have conspired with the ‘vulture funds located in British Territory' and threatened the lives of the sailors and cadets.
Oct 21st, 2012 - 03:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0At 10.02 the Chairman of the UNSC will stop Timmidman and remind him that he must base his claims on the truth otherwise their will be a motion of censure against AG.
At 10.03 after further ranting from Timmidman, the Chairman will politely ask him to ‘Urinate as he leaves the building’ there’s a good fellow.
(Timings may alter to take into account the crying of Timmidman into his hankie)
(77) Cher Isolde……
Oct 21st, 2012 - 04:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Some “serious” reading for this semester……..just to “somehow” understand the “historical” past.
http://www.bookdepository.co.uk/Making-Medieval-Forgeries-Alfred-Hiatt/9780712348157?b=-3&t=-20#Fulldescription-20
Guzz.....are all mestizo as thick as you? Those, again in big letters ARE ABOUT STATEHOOD. STATEHOOD HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INDEPENDENCE AS A SOVEREIGN NATION. That vast majority want it the way it is and the USA is saying statehood or leave and the PR's are doing neither.
Oct 21st, 2012 - 07:59 pm - Link - Report abuse 0PR wants the best of both worlds. For decades, the question of Puerto Rico's status has been hotly and actively debated, with dominant local political parties organized according to a relationship-to-the-U.S. ideology. For 40 years, the political leadership of the island has see-sawed between those who support statehood and those who support continuation of the commonwealth, with roughly 10% of the population supporting independence.
The problem with the polls, they never ask for EITHER statehood or independence. The vast majority of PR's twant the status quo, the vast majority of American want to stop the flow or roaches:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-14/obama-wants-puerto-rico-to-decide-statehood-or-independence-1-.html
Independence is such a miniscule sector. In 1946, Gilberto Concepción de Gracia founded the Puerto Rican Independence Party (PIP), which continues to participate in the island's electoral process. The party has elected some legislative candidates, but has yet to win more than a few percentage points of the vote in gubernatorial elections (2.04% in 2008) or the legislative elections (4.5-5% of the island-wide legislative vote in 2008) There has only been 3 previous votes; 1967, 1993 and 1998 and the next...this November. Each time remaining a commonwealth status overwhelming wins by over 60 and independence gains less than 5% of the votes. Even the ”Independent Party only has 4% of the legislative seats. We do not WANT PR why the hell do you think we get having them vote? If you are the best mestizo's have.......no wonder you are fading, too stupid to know how to repopulate! Argue a point when you understand and know the facts.
I know what to do, lets ask the Puerto Ricans if they want statehood... Just in case....
Oct 21st, 2012 - 10:04 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Again for the fourth time it's on the ballot. # questions 1-keep the commonwealth 2- Become a state 3- become an independent nation. The 98 vote only 2.5 % wanted to be independent. Needless to say we where very upset. We really want them on there on, no one wants latin roaches, they are inbreed half breeds and collect welfare.....here, argentina should take them. They don't work and are happy with government handouts! Should fit right in with the peronist
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 12:10 am - Link - Report abuse 0Have you asked them if they want statehood at least?
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 06:34 am - Link - Report abuse 0Assuming you read my response you must mean me personally? What kind of a fool minded question is that? I want them out! I am tired of supporting them on welfare. They can't support themselves yet they are always flying back and forth to PR.
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 10:11 am - Link - Report abuse 0@81 Think,
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 10:30 am - Link - Report abuse 0You're such a stud, Think...................
Maybe they want statehood then... When are they voting?
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 11:46 am - Link - Report abuse 0November 11th. And the same questions will be presented as in 1998, 1993 and 1967........Do you want to stay a commonwealth (territory), do you want to be a US State, or do you want to be a independent nation. As I said, the movenment to be an indepedent nation has never really moved beyond 4% of the population which is reflected in the elected officials as they as hold less than 4% of the elected seats and offices in all of PR.
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 12:43 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Poppy.Were you glad to be diverted to PR issue,and back to your racist,used and abuse heroe profile.If the USA,who took in PR,pulled out of PR,how much do you think you would save.Nothing I'd guess,because you are not significant in the whole picture,you just over-value yourself.
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 12:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Do you think the UK would pull-out of any of their overseas territories if they were a drain on the UK purse?
Thats for the name Yulena......I'm truly honored by your profile of me....again, always an assumption. Now have I ever stated I am significant to the marco view? Please point me to that post? But then again it would depoend on what the macro view is that is being viewed.
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 01:07 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Guzz, 11/6....my typo.
On a simluar note......RG's relaize that they cannot send an aircraft to fly the crew home and are asking neighbors for help......lol Chile offered but RG's are not all that thrilled and asked Brazil for help. What do they say about beggars? Oh yes, they can't be choosers, but RG's do not know that.
They was going to send Tango One as is it immune.....but it is being repaired.......IN THE USA......lol
It's really comical to read.
http://www.buenosairesherald.com/article/114845/gov%E2%80%99t-fears-ghana-will-impound-plane
I bet the want statehood then, everything points that direction...
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 04:39 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Poppy you kid yourself a lot don't you.Watch today prez debate and post your view as to who wins before the pundits do.We can see how accurate you are or are you not up for that.
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 05:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Is cuntina debating someone.....I hear she's a master debater....I saw a video!
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 06:10 pm - Link - Report abuse 0I suppose some people need a presidential debate winner to know whom they are voting for. What is your point, you know, I am a gringo and thick headed.......only good for gun toting the the central american countries...that's all we are good for.....ya'll know?
You said it poppy.Everyone knows there's a winner and a loser.But you I guess.
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 08:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0No gringo loses when they can plink in central america
Oct 22nd, 2012 - 09:17 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Poppy
Oct 23rd, 2012 - 06:29 am - Link - Report abuse 0Have a go at it while you can. Nicaragua is with us and soon the others as well. Your grip on Mexico might be tight, but the will of the people is stronger...
Apparently you have no clue what I meant. I will leave that go.
Oct 23rd, 2012 - 10:15 am - Link - Report abuse 0Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!