MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, July 1st 2022 - 02:11 UTC



PM Thatcher “never, never expected” Argentina to invade the Falklands; “it was such a stupid thing to do”

Friday, December 28th 2012 - 05:03 UTC
Full article 279 comments
“That night no-one could tell me whether we could retake the Falklands - no-one. We did not know - we did not know”, reveal the declassified documents (Photo PA) “That night no-one could tell me whether we could retake the Falklands - no-one. We did not know - we did not know”, reveal the declassified documents (Photo PA)
”Argentina is not just another 'banana republic”, warned then ambassador in Buenos Aires, Anthony Williams ”Argentina is not just another 'banana republic”, warned then ambassador in Buenos Aires, Anthony Williams

The 1982 invasion of the Falkland Islands by Argentina caught PM Margaret Thatcher by surprise, newly released government papers have shown. The then-prime minister only saw it was likely after getting “raw intelligence” two days before the Argentines landed.

Papers released under the 30-year rule show Mrs Thatcher were acutely worried about retaking the Islands. One historian said the documents were among the “most powerful material” declassified in the last three decades.

In October 1982, a few months after the war ended, Mrs Thatcher gave evidence behind closed doors to the Falkland Islands Review Committee, chaired by Lord Franks.

The transcript of that dramatic testimony has now been published for the first time.

“I never, never expected the Argentines to invade the Falklands head-on. It was such a stupid thing to do, as events happened, such a stupid thing even to contemplate doing”, Mrs Thatcher told the Franks Committee.

There had been some British contingency planning in the month before the Argentine invasion of the Falklands. On 26 March 1982, Ministry of Defence officials came back to Mrs Thatcher with a plan to deter a full-scale invasion.

One sentence shocked her, and she wrote it in her diary:

I  just put down in my diary:”Moreover, if faced with Argentine occupation on arrival there would be no certainty that such a force would be able to retake the dependency”. You can imagine that turned a knife in my heart, that lot.

However, in her oral evidence, she stressed that she had still considered an invasion unlikely:

...four month was something new. I again stress, I thought that they would be so absurd and ridiculous to invade the Falklands that I did not think it would happen. Nevertheless one has always to make contingency plans, and soon after we got the South Georgia incident happening.

The picture changed on 31 March 1982 when Mrs Thatcher was shown intelligence suggesting that an invasion was on the cards:

Chairman: That is right. What happened in August 1914, etc:
- A. I do not remember that: I just say it was the worst I think moment of my life.

She also told the committee: “That night no-one could tell me whether we could retake the Falklands - no-one. We did not know - we did not know.”

The British foreign secretary at the time, Lord Carrington, also gave evidence to the Franks Committee, where he too held the view that Argentina was not going to invade the Falklands.

”I have been accused, and was accused violently after 2 April in the House of Commons, and in the press and elsewhere - of wilfully ignoring signs and statements and evidence, and just ignoring it. I can truthfully say I did not do any of these things… they (the signs of an invasion) were not there,“ Lord Carrington said.

On 5 April, Lord Carrington resigned as foreign secretary, which prompted this reaction from Mrs Thatcher: ”I had tremendous confidence in Peter Carrington, and his loss seemed to me a devastating blow for Britain and I would back him up all the way.“

The political historian Lord Hennessy said Mrs Thatcher's evidence about the Falklands War was some of the most powerful material to be declassified by the National Archives in the last three decades.

”It's only three months after the end of the war, so it's immensely vivid. It's still coursing through her veins.
“She also has this great power of expression - she's a primary colours politician.”

Argentina's invasion of the Falklands may have come as a surprise to Mrs Thatcher and her ministers, but the government papers do reveal some interesting pointers.

As early as 1977 there was a British intelligence assessment that Argentine military action was possible if talks over the Islands went badly. At the end of that year, the British government decided to send a submarine and two frigates to the South Atlantic.

However, the ships' movements were kept secret.

Indeed, there was no conspicuous British naval presence in the South Atlantic in the five years that preceded the war. This may be why Argentina thought Britain would not launch an attack to retake the Falklands in April 1982.

Also, Britain's ambassador in Buenos Aires in 1982, Anthony Williams, felt some of his warnings sent to London were simply ignored.

“Argentina is not just another 'banana republic' - a tin pot country led by a tin pot dictator,” he wrote in his valedictory despatch in June 1982.

“Argentina has its share of vandals, hooligans and roughs. But this is not the whole story, nor was the seizure of the Islands a simple act of brigandage.”

• 2 April 1982: Argentine forces invade Falkland Islands. Other British South Atlantic territories including South Georgia are seized shortly afterwards
• 5 April: A British task force of more than 100 ships sets sail for the South Atlantic
• 25 April: South Georgia is recaptured by British forces.
• 2 May: Argentine cruiser General Belgrano sunk by HMS Conqueror, killing more than 320
• 21 May: Three thousand British troops begin landing at San Carlos on East Falkland
• 28-29 May: British forces recapture Goose Green.
• 8 June: British landing craft are bombed at Fitzroy, killing more than 50 men
• 13 June: Argentine positions on mountains overlooking the capital Port Stanley are taken
• 14 June: Argentine forces surrender. British troops march into Stanley

255 British servicemen and three Falklands civilians died during the conflict. The number of Argentine dead is estimated at about 650. (BBC).-

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Gordo1

    Argentine politicians? They were military bully boys who knew nothing about politics about governance.

    But then the Kirchner gang are allegedly politicians but they, too, seem to know nothing about proper governance.

    Dec 28th, 2012 - 07:24 am +1
  • Pete Bog

    “If Argentina at that time had been a democratic nation, the Islanders probably would have had a different view.”

    Quite possibly, but Britains acquiesence to Argentina was based on accepting their version of history without actually examining all the context involved-1765,1771,1810,1811,1820-1833, 1850,1863 etc etc.

    I can see nothing in Argentina's claims that equates to a justified, outright claim to the islands, (ie it can be contested at every point),and now the spectre of the Islanders increasing journey to Independance through graduating stages of autonomy since 1982, replaces the former colonialism of the UK and the aimed for colonialism of Argentina.

    Dec 28th, 2012 - 06:51 pm +1
  • Anglotino

    “I never, never expected the Argentines to invade the Falklands head-on. It was such a stupid thing to do”

    Never doubt the ability of politicians to do really stupid things when backed into a corner.

    But then again, never doubt others will also do really smart things when cornered.

    Argentinean politicians invaded the Falklands and lost power.
    British politicians fought back and gained power for longer.

    Did Argentinean rejuvenate Britain? And give her back pride and purpose? Funny when you think about it.

    Dec 28th, 2012 - 05:56 am 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!