MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, December 22nd 2024 - 17:56 UTC

 

 

Falklands growing meat industry exposed to international market volatility

Sunday, July 14th 2013 - 11:05 UTC
Full article 50 comments

Falkland Islands meat industry is suffering the pains of growth and of international markets’ volatility, according to the latest number of sheep and cattle processed in the EU licensed local Sand Bay abattoir. However the quality and quantity of lambs produced continues to advance. Read full article

Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Think

    TWIMC

    57,771 sheep slaughtered and £526,000 lost in the 2012/13 season.....
    “There goes a tenner” for every slaughtered sheep....
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bYXYlCbBJ0

    No sweat, the English voluntary contributions to the European Development Fund monies allocated to Malvinas will cover it.....

    Just keep up the good work.....
    Losing a tenner

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bYXYlCbBJ0

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 12:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Porto Margaret

    #1

    Talking of monies.The UK is no longer going to throwing millions of pounds, through WB at the waste of space that is Argentina.

    It is a far better that support is given to the Falkland Islands. There the investment is sound.

    You appear to have been infected by the KFC regime and show the same symptoms as that international exposed ninny, your very own Dopey Timerman. He yaps in a tourette manner also about those fantasy islands malvinas.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 02:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Poppy

    think when are you letting a-voice out to play? Is he canned for a while?

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 03:02 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Conqueror

    @1 But isn't it nice to see that argieland, once the world's leading beef exporter, has “dropped off”. As of May 2013, Brazil exported 1.3 million tons, little Uruguay exported 350,000 tons, democratic Paraguay exported 210,000 tons whilst useless, corrupt, criminal argieland could only export 183,000 tons. Not too many dollars to be made there! Seems as though the world has recognised that argie beef is dangerous. Too many drugs, too many artificial hormones, too much greed. Eat the stuff yourselves. Then we can watch as you get sick, succumb to mental incapacity, die. Taste of your own “medicine”.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 03:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Think

    Turnip at (2)

    Talking of momies...... The UK (as the USA) are voting against lending millions of Pounds through the World Bank to Argentina.......

    But the World Bank will, despite the negative vote from the UK (and the USA), continue lending millions of Dollars to Argentina.....

    Ohhhhhhhh.....
    You didn't know that?
    Didn't MercoPress inform you about that little “Detail”?
    Why don't you “Think” before embarrasing yourself in public?
    Turnip!

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 03:23 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Porto Margaret

    Yapper #5

    No the marker has been made. KFC now knows the score. UK votes no to investing in waste of space land. Money better spent where it is worth it.

    So keep yapping. Can you spot the difference?

    Timerman
    http://www.notitrans.com/viewAsset.php?id=111927

    Dopey
    http://www.notitrans.com/viewAsset.php?id=111927

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 03:30 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Think

    Turnip at (6)

    A “marker” may have been set...
    CFK may even “know the score” now...
    UK (and the USA) VOTE against World Bank loans to Argentina...
    But..................., as long as they PAY, nobody cares how they VOTE...
    And they are still paying....

    Chuckle chuckle©

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 03:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • A_Voice

    UK
    Imports: $646 billion (2012 est.)
    Exports: $481 billion (2012 est.) ……:-(
    USA
    Imports: $2.357 trillion (2012 est.)
    Exports: $1.612 trillion (2012 est.) ……:-(
    Argentina
    Imports: $67.33 billion (2012 est.)
    Exports: $85.36 billion (2012 est.) ……:-)
    Bolivia
    Imports: $8.14 billion (2012 est.)
    Exports: $10.97 billion (2012 est.) ……:-)
    Brazil
    Imports: $238.8 billion (2012 est.)
    Exports: $256 billion (2012 est.) ……:-)
    Chile
    Imports: $70.2 billion (2012 est.)
    Exports: $83.66 billion (2012 est.) ……:-)
    Peru
    Imports: $41.15 billion (2012 est.)
    Exports: $47.38 billion (2012 est.) ……:-)
    Venezuela
    Imports: $56.69 billion (2012 est.)
    Exports: $96.9 billion (2012 est.) ……:-)
    Do you see a pattern?

    Half a million sheep!......That's some Harem you've got there boys......so that's why you all wear the big wellies all the time!

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 03:54 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Porto Margaret

    Yapper #7

    Tick tock.

    The balls rolling and KFC better grab as many WB Dollars as she can.

    Tick tock.

    Did you spot the difference? I can't.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 03:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Clyde15

    #7
    As long as they pay, Argentina does not care.
    When the repayments are due will they stay true to type ?
    No, we will not repay this. It is against our constitution to pay back loans. We are being victimised !

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 04:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Britninja

    Stink is the perfect embodiment of why Argentina is considered a corrupt, immoral dump - he's actually *proud* that his country is a leeching, thieving parasite :)

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 04:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Faz

    #1 Utter Stink over Dover, you are living in cuckoo land no-one is going to lend RGland any more $ . Soon foreign currency will totally dry up and there will be no $ or £ to pay for your single malt. Then your booze fueled verbal garbage generator will seize up and you will be stuffed. Per head of population Falklands meat exports dwarf yours. You are losing....

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 05:12 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Poppy

    Still waiting #8 thinkless stink a voice.

    stink a-voice hole..........are you back to answer my response to:

    ”Why not save us all some time and you explain what he meant by essential liberty......because I can guarantee, you would be the first, as Franklin failed to define what should be covered by “essential liberty”.

    in article:
    en.mercopress.com/2013/07/09/strong-letter-to-cristina-fernandez-for-blocking-amia-case-prosecutor-from-testifying-before-us-congress#comments

    because I really want to know about your guarantee. More so that you are clueless about the entire phrase as was Hep C but that did not stop you from using a portion of history to use incorrectly because you know nothing of the context.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 06:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    Inside every dead pig,,
    is another little argie waiting to get out..

    they are doing just great thank you..
    keep up the good work ..

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 06:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    8,13
    Stinko and Poppy

    ThinksVoiceOver
    “”Why not save us all some time and you explain what he meant by essential liberty......because I can guarantee, you would be the first, as Franklin failed to define what should be covered by “essential liberty”.”

    Poppy,
    Still no answer from ArgieVoiceOver????

    Is he stupid??

    Why's Avoice running and hiding like a cringing cur?

    BTW, with Argentina being an integral part of the Fslklands continental shelf, it should be cheap to ship the excess meat to their people to offset the agricultural shortages there, and the impending food shortage.

    Oh, right! Falklands vessels are unable to dock there :-(

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 07:39 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • GFace

    To whom is the main export market of Lamb from the Islands? For us when it's Timmy Time, we think of Australia but more still, New Zealand.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 07:43 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Britworker

    We should be buying this lamb as a priority after Welsh lamb.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 07:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Poppy

    Troy, besides oil, the Falklands should grow tomatos and build a toilet paper plant. Between Venezuela and Argentina coupled with oil, the residents will be millionaires.
    stinko A -voice shows how stupid he really is by making a lame statement, getting caught and running and ignoring the question. Everytime I bring it up I am sure he goes back to his virtual world in the la campora basement seeking a clever response or some raving insult. Maybe something like dumburger and call my Amexican eating tacos and chilupas. Funny thing is I do like Mexican food now and then.......lol

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 08:14 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    Captain

    Post your email address again - in case Stink forgot it

    :-)

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 08:52 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Think

    TWIMC

    Lots of turnips but no Kelpers on this thread...... Wonder why?

    How long has Sand Bay existed?
    Isn't it about 10 years?

    How much money has the FIG(leaf) thrown into this black hole?
    Isn't it about 20,000,000 £?

    How much was the financial loss this season?
    Isn't it about £526,000?

    Good job John, Nigel & Mattjeep.......
    Chuckle chuckle©

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 09:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Poppy

    Tomatos and toilet paper. Perhaps they can extract salt from the sea as well. Sea salt is better than the mined salt anyway

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 09:39 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Porto Margaret

    Yapper #20

    Still yapping, but saying nothing of consequence.

    How much money has the FIG(leaf) thrown into this black hole?...

    They don't do foreign aid to the waste of space that is Argentina. Even you know that.

    Tick tock.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 10:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • A_Voice

    @13
    Where are you....... MP's very own Captain America?
    Having looked through dozens of articles……….it's exactly as I said it was.
    The phrase has been argued and debated many times by many scholars and they all draw their own conclusions………..and why is this?
    Because the context of the line in question is ambiguous.
    This is a link to one of the most balanced arguments…..
    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/22/did-ben-franklin-actually-think-liberty-was-more-important-than-security/
    If you feel you are more qualified to explain it better……..then the stage is yours, jump up onto the podium and impress us all.
    But do bear in mind..... if the US Government didn't think that it pertained to Liberty then why bother having this inscribed on a plaque in the stairwell of the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty:
    “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
    …………Remember ....“Support Bacteria” - they're the only culture Yanks have.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 10:04 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pete Bog

    @21
    Captain-they do grow Tomatoes(commercially)-but perhaps they need to grow more.
    Should the toilet paper be plain or have Timmermans/CFKs face on to generate the maximum commerciality from Argentinian customers?

    @20
    How much was the financial loss this season?
    Isn't it about £526,000?

    Argentina would kill to only owe that sum of money-although of course they never pay it back.

    Well as Argentina doesn't need £200 mil of UK aid anymore, a small sliver of that would help the Islanders.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 10:29 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Poppy

    Your a dumber fuck you you lead us all to believe. In that lovely, overused quote, Franklin, was responding and writing to the Governor of Pennsylvania on November 11, 1755 with respect to taxing the landowners in order to secure the British army to protect the frontier settlements during the French and Indian war. The Penn family owned most of Pennsylvania and did not want to pay an annual tax. They offered the settlers a short term fix.... money to purchase guns to protect themselves and the Governor was in favor of that opposing taxation.
    Temporary purchased security.....the guns versus the might of the British Army.........Essential liberty? The right of the people to impose taxation through elected officials and to make that choice themselves.
    This is something you cannot get from the internet and something you need to discuss in s forum. Read the actual entire writing. Would you like the volume and page? I gave you the date.
    Again.....you spent three days looking. Try Yale University.
    Again as I said before, you are ignorant to the actual context unless you read the letter in it's entirely. Do not confuse on other occassions when Franklin uses essential liberty and liberties. It is different for you to think you can be wrong but you are not only wrong you are an idiot for your arrogance.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 10:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • A_Voice

    You really are stupid..........yeah that's why the quote is in the STATUE OF LIBERTY........because it was so significant .
    and this whole article is wrong..........
    www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/22/did-ben-franklin-actually-think-liberty-was-more-important-than-security/
    and only you are right.........
    You really are the dumbest Yank I've ever come across........
    I can post another half dozen links saying the same thing........and you will just deny it............because.............you're.......STUPID

    The context of the line in question is ambiguous. It comes after a reference to the frontiersmen of Pennsylvania, and is not directly made with reference to the Penn family, the “Proprietary commission” or any other governing body. Rather, the line that precedes it is, “We have taken every Step in our Power, consistent with the just Rights of the Freemen of Pennsylvania, for their Relief, and we have Reason to believe, that in the Midst of their Distresses they themselves do not wish us to go farther.” In other words, Franklin can quite plausibly be read as saying, “We have gone as far to ensure security as residents of Pennsylvania actually want, and if they don’t want us to go further, we won’t. After all, giving up one’s liberty in the name of security means you deserve neither liberty nor security.”

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 11:04 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    Poppy

    For a start he's too lazy, especially when he suspects it won't go his way.

    ThinksVoiceOver doesn't make statements - too dangerous, it might give away too much information about himself, and it leaves him more vulnerable to being picked apart by logical arguments backed by facts. Imagine!

    Thinkedover tries to ask questions that will sow doubt, and he waits for our responses, to ridicule them or try to undermine them.

    In other words, the issues are not important to him, except the cessation of free ££££. He only wants to ridicule and discredit.

    What a way to spend every day of a life, hour after hour :-)

    Sad, lonely, bitter, and now, disillusioned.

    CHUCKLE CHUCKLE

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 11:10 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • A_Voice

    haha saddo Troy .......Anglotino not about too much so you have latched onto Poppy as your pal.........you always need someone.......
    You should do some research yourself.........all Poppet is doing is reciting Benjamin Wittes of Harvard and the Brookings Institute's argument..........that's it.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 11:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    You have yet to refute it properly.

    As Poppy said, because you can't.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 11:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Poppy

    You are stupider than a fucking rg whore......try the “Papers of Benjamin Franklin” archived in Yale University. We all know you are educated via the internet. Try real educations.....where “links” cannot happens in classroom. Stick you head further up your argentine ass to smell the roses.
    I am not the only one to know that........most of the history professors in the USA know that.......everyone BUT your internet discussion forum links.......lol
    I understand you must read other peoples interpretation of his writings, but did YOU read his letter in it's entirety? Such as in the opening“
    ”The House came together at this Time with the sincerest Dispositions to avoid, if possible, all Disputes with the Governor on any Account whatever. And being deeply affected with the present distressful Circumstances of the Frontier Counties, determined to do, for the publick Safety and Welfare, every Thing that could reasonably be expected from them, either as dutiful Subjects to the Crown, or Lovers of their Country.“

    Or when he is directly talking about the governor exempting taxation on Penn's land:

    ”during the Continuance of the Act, the Crown should think fit to declare, that the Estates of the Proprietaries in this Province ought to be exempted, in such Case the Tax, tho’ assessed, shall not be levied, or if any Part has been levied, the same shall be refunded to the Proprietaries, and an additional Tax laid on the People to supply the Deficiency.“

    This entire writing is about taxation. The only thing on Lady Liberty is the poem ”New Colosssus”

    Stick to tossing RG's out of helicopters.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 11:29 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • A_Voice

    You don't know shit do you...........
    “The only thing on Lady Liberty is the poem ”New Colosssus”
    What are you going to say when I prove you wrong ..........are you now trying to tell me that.....“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
    IS NOT inscribed on a plaque in the stairwell of the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty: ??.........Haha you are kidding me surely???
    You've been Wiki reading again......and you are such a liar you don't know anything.....do you know this?......
    The Franklin ”letter” you are referring to was actually written in 1775 and not 1755. It does not show up at all in the 197 letters that Franklin wrote from 1737-1783. It does however show up in the 1775 “notes for a proposition at the Pennsylvania Assembly”, as published in “Memoirs of the life and writings of Benjamin Franklin” (1818). Although attributed to Franklin the actual citation in the notes was put in quotes - a strong indication that the material was being quoted and not original material. Finally, the quote “Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety“ is found on the title page of ”An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania” which was published, by Franklin, in 1759 but was actually authored by Richard Jackson.
    Keep your dumb head out of Wiki ya fuckwit!

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 11:44 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Poppy

    On Liberty herself....you typed on the pedestal.....read up if you forget....they are many quotes NOT on the statue. As long as you think your are superior, you will always be subject to your weakness.

    VOL 6 of the Franklin Papers

    http://franklinpapers.org/franklin//framedVolumes.jsp;jsessionid=8532338C8054967C3A1F892DC936384D

    go to bed to you moron. There ....a link, now you can actually read it.

    Jul 14th, 2013 - 11:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • A_Voice

    Hah you fool........you looked it up and saw I was right and now changing your tune..........What a Plonker........how stupid do you feel now :-))))))
    Did I type on the pedestal...........lets look......
    “But do bear in mind..... if the US Government didn't think that it pertained to Liberty then why bother having this inscribed on a plaque in the stairwell of the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty: ”

    So tell me again why put a meaningless quote about taxation........on a plaque in the stairwell of the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty??
    You are missing the whole point........it may or may not mean what it says, that wasn't my point. My point was it's whole meaning has been debated and debated to death and everyone has their opinion as to what it means.........there is no conclusive proof either way. Which is what I originally said!
    Thank you and goodnight!

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 12:10 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Poppy

    DOn't the the actual subject of which is Ben Franklin 1775 you still insist?

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 12:12 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • A_Voice

    Not at all the earliest known use of said quote was actually 1736, the whole argument as far as I have seen has been taken from the letter to the governor in 1755 but it has been used several times and by different people.
    The argument will go on forever!

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 12:32 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Poppy

    That quote in his letter as I stated numerous times......to the governor as I specifically stated was in 1755 and you stated that letter was actually 1775. That letter is in the government archives in Pennsylvania as he was an Assemblyman at the time.
    This is not about the quote in general, it is about the quote the Benjamin Franklin used in that letter in 1755 to the Governor of Pennsylvania over taxing ALL land owners and not exempting some.
    As Hep C said......to quote Ben Franklin again.
    I have never heard that quote earlier than the assemblymen's letter. I could be wrong. Until you I err. But can you show me where in USA documents it is published? I provided you with the November 11, 1755 letter.

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 12:45 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Islander1

    Think- for the benefit of the ignorant such as you - the Abbattoir,s principle raole and why it was built - was as a means of support to Agriculture and diversification of the rural sector.
    Agree current situation of 1/2Million K loss is not good - but the principle is that £2.5 million went into the farms where it is badly needed - and a mere cost to the FI taxpayer (not the UK at all) of £0.5 million so £1 became £5 - not bad value.
    Fail to see the connection with the EU? That funding has come from the entire EU -not the UK - if the Uk was to fund spomething here(they dont) then they would do it direct - whay on earth would they do it through the EU?

    Are you well stocked with Tomatoes? Ours come from Chile and Uruguay at this time of year but we grow plenty in the Islands during the season - maybe we can export some to Argentina next summer?

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 03:47 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Anglotino

    A_Voice off topic AGAIN.

    Nothing changes on these forums. Who said that again?

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 11:26 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • A_Voice

    @38
    Whatcha' trying to say?
    Hehehe........throw in a few red herrings....... stick a couple of quotes around it, post no link and Bobs your uncle!(Uncle/Dad for Rednecks).......they will spend all day chasing their tails and searching the net to prove you wrong..........relax, crack open a tin of Possum, stick in a plug of chew and enjoy ;-).......Rednecks dontcha' love em!.........“sure gotta purty mouth”

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 02:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Poppy

    Still insisting that letter was written in 1775? What about the link to the quote dated in 1736?

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 03:33 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Benson

    For once I agree with something Think says, most people thought it would be a financial sinkhole before it started. Whether the benefits outweigh the cost... not sure.

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 03:44 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • A_Voice

    @40
    Are you still going on? .......you never learn.......fine, see for yourself.......
    http://piv.pivpiv.dk/

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 04:36 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    “A-Voice”, Stevie, Guzz - all like to link to sites from Denmark

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 06:12 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    what has all this to do with dead pigs,

    unless you are brining home the bacon..lol.

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 06:19 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Think

    (37) Islander1

    Firstly……., the Abbattoir’s ”principal role” seems to be a headless administrative decision to “support and diversify Camp” by producing the same booooring frozen, one year old “lambmuttons” as everybody else in the world does…………......... at a much higher cost.
    If you Kelpers want to throw millions of £ out of the window supporting the meat industry, do it at least with style….. “Thinking out of the Box”…..
    What about producing premium quality CHILLED 10 kg Milk-fed lambs…......... or CHILLED six months old Spring lambs…...... or CHILLED 20 kg. Sucker salt marsh lambs?

    Secondly….., the €4.13 million you Kelpers just got from the European Development Fund (EDF) come from ”VOLUNTARY” donations from EU member Countries to the said Fund….; NOT from the EU normal budget…..
    The UK finances their Colonies indirectly through the EU to avoid having to explain to their Electorate why each of you ~2,500 Richy Rich English Kelpers gets an extra subsidy of ~ € 1,700 …..
    (Or why each of the ~40 English Pitcairners gets an extra subsidy of ~ € 65,000 ;-)

    (41) Benson……
    As usual...... you Kelpers are, by far, the most common sensed Anglos in here……

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 07:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Poppy

    Do they Troy? Didn't he and his nits.....I mean kids escape to Europe?

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 07:14 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    Think

    So now the money came from the UK and was laundered through the EU.

    Keep taking the medication.

    Sheesh! Not every country follows the Argentine way of doing things you know!

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 07:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Islander1

    Think 45 - you claim to know lots about the Islands - well how in hell do you feed that type of lamb on our pastures in our climate!! Try again please!
    Falklands Lamb is indeed exported - Europe and elsewhere and gets a premium as it is Organic - but even premium meats are depressed market prices these days.
    Oh do give up your silly baseless and factless crap about the EU and the UK - and where that 4.3m euros came from. ALL the Dependent territories of Member States- UK-France-Holland are elegible for an allocation of Dev funding.
    I would agree though that it surprised me abit given our GDP and per capita income etc - but guess Brussels thought otherwise.

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 09:07 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Think

    (48) Islander1

    1) If Iceland can.....; you can too.....
    Stop whining and blaming the pastures!
    You sound almost Argentinean ;-)

    2) All my EU facts are just that......... facts. Check them out.
    Where did I say that England was the only Ex Colonial power using that trick?

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 11:02 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Islander1

    Think - and where is Icveland close to for high value premium fresh meat market? Let me see its wealtrhy north America and western Europe.
    Where is the nearest market for the Falklands for that stuff? - hardly going to be a seller in S America much is it!

    Iceland also happens to have a lot more fertile a soil than we do - where they have some.

    Show me the evidence where England has ever paid £1 into the EU? I think you will find that UK or GB if you like) has but never England.
    Show us the linked and definative trail then that shows that those Member States particularily channel their own EU Contributions through to their own Overseas territories?

    Jul 15th, 2013 - 11:14 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Think

    (50) Islander1

    1) What has proximity to the ”High Value Premium Fresh Meat Market” to do with anything ???
    You just put them Young Spring Lamb cuts into some nice Cryovac bags and keep them at about 37 degrees during the 4-6 weeks boat trip to USA - Europe.
    That's essentially the time needed for the wet-aging process to properly tenderize the meat…...
    No rocket science here, mate…............. Them Ozzies do it all the time.

    2) What has ”More Fertile Soil in Iceland” to do with anything ???
    You just have to slaughter them bloody sheep earlier, thats all, mate…..
    But no…. you prefer to produce the ”Good Ol’ Frozen Mutton 365”….
    Just have a look at them carcasses in this article’s picture, Mr. Islander1
    They are almost the size of cows....
    No wonder you are losing money by the bucket....

    Jul 16th, 2013 - 04:55 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pete Bog

    @48
    “well how in hell do you feed that type of lamb on our pastures in our climate”

    Can't you plant more Tussac Grass for the long term, (I appreciate this cannot happen overnight) and have more controlled grazing when new sections of Tussac mature, rather than allowing graze out?

    Jul 17th, 2013 - 11:41 am - Link - Report abuse 0

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!