MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, November 15th 2024 - 03:57 UTC

 

 

Falklands, global espionage and multilateral organizations in CFK dialogue with Ban Ki-moon

Monday, August 5th 2013 - 23:18 UTC
Full article 45 comments

Argentine president Cristina Fernandez visited on Monday afternoon United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and called for a restructuring of multilateral organisations in order to improve performance, using as an example regional body Unasur (Union of South American Nations). Read full article

Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • GFace

    What a weak and cowardly liar she is. The world knows how Argentina backed out of, no...ran from talks the moment they saw that the very people would be most affected most by any changes to the status quo would be there. How pathetic and weak does a nation have to be fear the democratically representatives of 3000 or so people.

    Aug 05th, 2013 - 11:55 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Redrow

    “What we have repeatedly maintained is the need for a rethink on international bodies, and on the capacity they have to be real intermediaries in conflicts.”

    Something like the ICJ for instance?

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 01:37 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Gordo1

    Did Timerman not tell her that talks were offered in London during his most recent visit and he refused to take part?

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 01:40 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    Got to love this lot.

    They get the chair of an organisation set up to challenge problems around the globe and what do they talk about?

    Themselves!!!!!!

    Selfish, self serving wankers.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 01:51 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • MrFlagpole

    The daft bint can't just pick the bits of the UN she wants.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 03:22 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • HansNiesund

    Gosh, that's funny. The UN SG makes an important statement regarding the UK's refusal to talk, and there is no mention of it whatsoever in the official spokesperson's readout of the meeting.

    Some mistake surely.

    http://www.un.org/sg/spokesperson/index.asp

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 03:35 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • toooldtodieyoung

    This woman is an idiot, she should not be allowed out with out a responsible adult.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 03:38 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Britworker

    It would be nice for once if someone turned round and reminded her that talks were on the table if they logically included the people they were talking about.

    I guess ignoring her just gets people through the day easier, but it is worrying that this women is allowed to chair the worlds table, tell blatant lies and get a round of applause.
    Can someone not ask her to referee a Brazilian football match?

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 04:08 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • BritishLion

    Poor old Ban Ki is looking bemused or is he just smiling in the vain hope she will not embarrass herself anymore...Doh, too late, she has done it again!

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 04:12 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Faz

    Personally, I am surprised she did not mention her countrys opposition to lab grown beefburgers. I would have thought that it was a much greater threat to the RG economy. Anyway Gollum only eats raw fish...

    Ban Ki Moon deepest sympathy...

    I note she had a pop at the composition of the UN security council which will endear her to all the permanent members especially the US.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 04:32 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • darragh

    Doesn't mention in the read out of the meeting between the Secretary General and KFC that the UK refused to discuss the Falkland Islands what it actually says is that the SGs services as a mediator are available (but then that's his job)- maybe whoever took the minutes didn't notice or, far more likely KFC is a lying cow.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 05:00 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pete Bog

    Even if the Islanders wanted to become Argentine, she could not bypass meeting them.

    Until she accepts that the people that were born in the Falklands (especially those with several generations before them), have to be included in any talks, she can bang on to the UN as much as she likes.

    No UN nation in their right mind surely would deny the islanders rights to be at talks that involve them?

    The fact is the UK are prepared to talk at any time provided the people that are relevant are present.

    Unfortunately for Argentina, their fascist constitution means jack squit to the Islanders who have their own, and makes 'negotiation' impossible.

    The fact is that if the islanders did choose Argentine sovereignty they would be ethnically cleansed and deported (despite what the Argentine constitution apparently says.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 07:53 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Perekeme

    It is time for south America nations to boycott diplomatic relationship with Britain,since the British governnent has refused to hand over falkland island to Argentina. United nation should be able to sanction Britain also. No country is bigger than the united nation. The issue of falkland island is clear,it was captured from Argentina in 1833 by Britain. This was actually a violation of the right of Argentina as an independent country in 1833. In this modern time,no form of colonialism should be allowed. As a matter of fact, Argentina is the owner of Falkland island. There is no way falkland island can be granted independence,since it was illegally acquired by Britain. The only government that has the right to grant falkland island independence is that of Argentina,if only they are interested in doing that. I know Argentina will never do that because falkland island is their property.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 08:09 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Porto Margaret

    Well the grand result of this excursion to NewYork by KFC is going to be that tomorrow will be just like yesterday. Nothing at all will have changed.

    The Falklands Islanders will be getting on with their happy lives at home.
    Ban Ki-moon will meet someone else.
    Argentinas regime will bleat about the fantasy islands Malvinas.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 08:09 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • manchesterlad

    Civil war in Syria, Islamic militants taking over half of Africa, Iran building a nuclear bomb to threaten Israel, N. Korea threatening half the world .......... & what does CFK talk about........ The affront to poor old Morales & the UK not wanting to negotiate the Falklands.........truly pathetic!!!

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 08:12 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Gordo1

    @ 13 Perekeme - It would be interesting to learn where you picked up these allegations about the Falkland Islands - pretty well all the “facts” you cite are totally untrue. Please enlighten us!

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 09:54 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • El capitano

    Ahaaaaaaaaaaa...LMAO...Man oh man..06:53 here in British Columbia and I just had to have my daily fix of “Laughs”...Arjuntina and its antics always fullfill that need...On the other hand however its kinda scarey when one considers Arjuntina and its present position at the UN.BTW anyone out there who can obtain a copy of “The Nightmare Years 1930 to 1940” (William L Shirer) may I recomend it as an excellent read.The propaganda angle between nazi Germany and todays Arjuntina is indeed identical.Ohh dear silly me,is'nt Arjuntina the place where fleeing nazi's headed for after the defeat of their country.(welcomed with open arms)Ohh yes..thats right I do belive that Hitler had promised his lil buddy Peron the Falklands once Germany had dealt with those pesky Brits and anyone else who refused his attentions.The problem is however that Germany has moved on...Arjuntina on the other hand has no idea how to “move on”...!

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 10:09 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Buzzsaw

    Perekeme, Perekeme, Perekeme..deary, deary me. Ever heard the saying.... 'it is better to remain quiet and thought a fool than open it and remove doubt'.

    I just hope you are a troll, because if not, you have just shown what a ignorant, un-educated, retard you are....

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 10:12 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • screenname

    @13 Perekeme:

    I was waiting for the punchline, but it didn't seem to come... Did you accidentally click on the 'submit comment' button early?

    Surely, you can't actually be serious?

    To be a bit more truthful, I think you should have worded it this way...

    It is time for European nations to boycott diplomatic relationship with Latin America,since the Latin American governnents have refused to hand over South America to Spain. United nation should be able to sanction Latin America also. No country is bigger than the united nation. The issue of South America is clear,it was captured from Spain in the 1800s by thieving imperial Spanish subjects. This was actually a violation of the right of Spain as a sovereign country in the 1800s. In this modern time,no form of evil plastic Spanish colonists with expansionist ideas should be allowed. As a matter of fact, Argentina is a made up name invented by Spanish thieves long after the Falklands first appeared on a map. There is no way South America should have been granted independence,since it was illegally acquired by thieving imperial Spanish subjects. The only government that has the right to grant Argentina independence is that of Spain, if only they are interested in doing that. I know Spain have already done that, because they could not counter the aggressive actions taken by their South American-based thieving imperial Spanish subjects, but they should rule South America because their property was stolen.

    ... Of course that is conveniently forgetting about the indigenous Indians, but why should we expect you plastic Spanish thieves to give them any thought?

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 10:15 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • jwolf

    @13 EVERY country is bigger than the UN. It's called National Sovereignty You know sovereignty, it's the word Argentina always throws out there. The UN is a deliberative body, NOT a world government. What a messed up perspective to support your argument. No wonder the British flag still flies over the Falkland Islands......
    .

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 10:17 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • BritishLion

    @13 Perekeme
    Oh dear, oh dear, what a load of brainwashed rubbish said @13, heard thousands of times uttered by thousands of poor deluded brainwashed Argies who can no more think outside of their brainwashed box than a hungry pack of wolves could walk past a dead cow. Could be a Troll as mentioned, even if so, it shows the ignorance of these people, beyond belief!

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 10:38 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • agent999

    UN Security Council live

    http://webtv.un.org/

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 10:41 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • manchesterlad

    Unfortunately Perekeme is the result of public education in Argentina... brainwashed to believe that world history began in 1833

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 11:08 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Porto Margaret

    #22

    The delegate from the LofAS gives KFC a run for her money with an impressive display of achieving nothing with his effort of dribbling yackety yak! A real winner.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 11:09 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • GFace

    @23 ...and that 1982 never happened.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 11:10 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Porto Margaret

    Some very awkward words for KFC and Argentine regime from the delegate from Azerbaijan.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 11:29 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Idlehands

    CFK is on live now - maybe she'll liven it up.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 01:01 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Conqueror

    @13 Seems there have been a number of comments explaining that yours is drivel. In the first instance, the British government is in no position to hand the Falkland Islands to argieland. The Falkland Islands are a trust territory under the auspices of the UN Charter. Britain is the trustee accepted by the UN. Its actions are limited by the UN Charter. Giving the Islands away is not an option. Especially to an undemocratic, lawless state such as argieland. The Falkland Islands have been British since 1690. And argieland came into being when? 1811 was it? And how did argieland come to own a territory that had been British for 121 years before argieland existed? Time travel? There is no colonialism. The Falkland Islands are self-governing. You're going to have to explain your concept of “illegal acquisition”. Because the only “illegal” acts I've been able to discover are those of argieland. For instance, there was the “visit” of David Jewett in 1820. However, Jewett was a pirate. A criminal cannot perform a legal act on behalf of a state. Besides, argieland wasn't recognised in 1820.In 1823, the United Provinces of the River Plate appoints Don Pablo Areguati as Commandant of Puerto Soledad. An appointment in name only as he never sets foot on the islands. Equally, it was an appointment relating to a territory not controlled by the UP. If you think the UP acted legally, I'm the President of the United States. Britain is charged by the UN to guide the Falkland Islands toward “self-government or independence as may be appropriate to the particular circumstances of each territory and its peoples and the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned” It WILL do so. Argieland is in breach of Article 74 of the UN Charter. Briefly, argieland can get knotted. Get the idea?

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 01:08 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Porto Margaret

    #27
    She couldn't help her loose mouth and mentioned those mysterious and fantasy islands malvinas.

    Hell! She also brings up Arjuntina of the '70 ‘80s and criticizes it.
    BUT....But didn’t her regime give medals too those that participated and have celebration days of Arjuntina. What a ninny.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 01:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • toooldtodieyoung

    13 Perekeme

    Great, that's what this site needs... another brain washed Argentinian.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 01:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Porto Margaret

    A commercial break now before the second half of the KFC (I'm on TV mum) show live from NYC.

    Put the kettle on and get a plate of rich tea biscuits.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 01:36 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    Whoopee shit, there it is, scrolling across the bottom of the screen on skynews,
    “Argentinas president Christina Kirchner has renewed her countrys demand for sovereignty over the Falkland Islands at UN Security Council.”

    She never fails to disappoint.

    Wonder what the UK response will be?

    How about, please do not adjust your ear pieces, normal service will be resumed as soon as possible.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 02:07 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • toooldtodieyoung

    31 Porto Margaret

    “Put the kettle on and get a plate of rich tea biscuits”

    Are they those ones with chocolate on??

    I love the ones with chocolate on....

    not as good as the Digestives but still pretty d*mn good!!

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 02:38 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Gordo1

    http://uk.news.yahoo.com/argentina-lodges-falklands-claim-un-173822654.html#xNJi74V

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 03:20 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • slattzzz

    @32 I'll tell you what the UK's response will be nada, nothing, zip, sweet fanny adam and quite right too, if this poisoned woman wants to rant on and on let her, dignity is not in her persona, whereas we hold all the cards and need to do and say nowt

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 03:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Brit Bob

    The woman is delusional and as a president, even of a third world country, is an embarrassment.

    http://falklandsnews.wordpress.com/2012/11/12/un-confirms-that-Britain-is-not-in-breach-of-resolutions-over-the-falklands/

    UN 2065 made in 1965 is no longer 'relevant' it has been surpassed by the 1982 invasion; Argentina making void UK/Arg agreements under the sovereignty umbrella; and the Falkland Islanders right to self-determination which was confirmed by the UN Fourth Committee when they decided that the right to self-determination could not be conditioned if there was a sovereignty dispute as that right to self-determination was too fundamental a human right.

    Comprende?

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 03:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Porto Margaret

    #33

    They're naked. No chocolate. I agree with you about Digestives though.

    Lots of Latam back slapping going on now. All I'm hearing is Blah Blah Blah!

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 03:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    What she is really demanding, is a change in the law, and or agreements that allow her and other dictators to acquire or steal what they want , when they want , and from whom they want, and call it legal,

    She is either brain dead or very naive , or very stupid,

    The UN would virtually have to scrap every agreement ever made, change history, and turn the clock back 50 years or more, virtually handing the whole free democratic world over to the likes of Mercosur
    And others like them,

    And anyone or any brain-dead Argies who thinks differently is truly a CFK fan.
    To be truthful, she has more chance of digging up Hitler and marrying him…lolol.
    .

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 03:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Buzzsaw

    What is this at the UN.....all I can hear is lots of Arse licking and an SA love in.
    Lots of self determination being mentioned......but not for the Falkalnds though....oh 2065 mentioned again.....just waiting for someone to mention 1833 for a good laugh...

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 04:08 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    Jesus the Ecuadorian is now playing the defender of human rights, get fucking real, the hypocrisy is enoiugh to make you puke!

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 04:27 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Porto Margaret

    Ha! Ha! She wasn't even listening to the fella from wherever Latam and had to be told and prompted to acknowledge that he had finished babbling.

    She is such a ninny.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 04:30 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • jakesnake

    How about spying in Argentina by the Argentine government? http://thenews.com.mx/index.php/2minutes-articulos/12623-argentine-spy-arrested------in-candidate-burglary-

    But hey, her government is spying on the opposition, so that doesn't count and I'm sure she won't bring that up with Mr. Ban Ki-Moon. Right?

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 04:40 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    How about the venezualans, what did they say, they had the names and addresses of every person who did not vote for them.

    How did they get that I wonder? and whilst harping on about human rights in the Great Bolivarian Republics, what do we think they are going to do with that information. Black list them from employment, access to state education and medical care denied etc, etc, etc.

    This lot are turning the UN into a bigger circus than usual!

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 04:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • screenname

    Oooooo, Mexico mention multilateral consultatioms. They'll go on her hit list.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 05:07 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • slattzzz

    @38 all of the above mate

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 05:16 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • golfcronie

    CFK should be ruling Argentina not fluffing around at the UN. I understand a bomb has gone off in Rosario, 10 dead umpteen injured, the reason the Intelligent Services exist is to combat terrorism, do you not agree?

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 07:36 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • GFace

    @41 “She wasn't even listening to the fella from wherever Latam and had to be told and prompted to acknowledge that he had finished babbling. ”

    I've chaired interminable meetings that are soooooooooooooo looooooooong and booooooooooring and filled with people needing their moments of self validation, that I zone off to my happy place. On this I will cut her some slack. In her case it's poetic justice.

    Aug 06th, 2013 - 08:12 pm - Link - Report abuse 0

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!