MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, December 8th 2022 - 05:35 UTC



Malvinas alleged ‘militarization’ again the obsession of Cristina Fernandez at anti-nuclear conference

Friday, August 23rd 2013 - 03:30 UTC
Full article 86 comments

During an anti-nuclear weapon conference held in Buenos Aires, Argentine President Cristina Fernández criticised the right to veto used by the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council which she described as an “out of time” instrument and again attacked the UK for ‘sending nuclear submarines’ to the Falkland Islands and called for a region of peace in the South Atlantic. Read full article


Disclaimer & comment rules
  • golfcronie

    History does not reflect that Argentina is a peaceful country, and how has Argentina repeatedly shown it is peaceful? If Argentina had not attacked the FALKLANDS it may well have attacked Chile. Probably on the cards.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 03:59 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pirate Love

    so because the crazy bitch doesn't get the result she wants from both UN and IMF she wants to ”rethink the multilateral organizations” , who the fuck is she?
    a fading corrupt populist of a tin pot country, she will want Mugabe as sec-gen of UN next.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:20 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • LEPRecon

    She also seems to forget that Brazil is currently on the way to developing nuclear powered submarines. I'm sure they're gonna be happy to scrap this project just because the mad harpy next door said they should.

    And Cristina, the South Atlantic is INTERNATIONAL WATERS. Despite your delusions they DO NOT belong to Argentina. So ANY country in the world can sail WHATEVER they like through those waters.

    Added to this, is whatever the UK wants sail through Falklands Territorial waters is a matter for the UK and the Falkland Islands Government and NOTHING to do with Argentina.

    Is that why you are so frustrated?

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:40 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Escoses Doido

    How much money did that confrence cost the argentinian tax payer?

    Just so they could sit and blether sh*te?

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:56 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Clyde15

    There is one obvious way she can have “peace”, she can just SHUT HER BIG MOUTH and all the world would be grateful ! The silence would be deafening.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:59 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Anglotino

    Rant rant rant Malvinas.

    Screech screech screech Malvinas.

    Aaaaaand repeat!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:11 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • FI_Frost

    Is there an election or something coming up?

    Arrh yes, time to wheel out the Malvinas and “ zee inglish pig dog swine pirate usurpers”. Old Faithful.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:11 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • ljb

    Does anybody actually take this deluded fool seriously? (Malvinists excluded)

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:24 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Zool

    “Argentina is committed to a peaceful and diplomatic course”
    Cristina Fernandez

    You can keep saying your peaceful Cristina but your actions, & history says otherwise Cristina.

    ”I’ve tried to have UN resolutions complied“

    What resolutions would that be Cristina, Oh you mean the non binding resolution from 30 years ago that your country Broke when it went to War. She does know as a result of that action the resolution was canceled & now the UN says its no longer active. You could always goto the ICJ Cristina

    ”Argentina has no religious or racial conflicts and is profoundly compliant with International law”

    What a joke, The embargo against British ships wasn't exactly following international law now was it Cristina & plus The UN only last September was criticizing Cristina & her regime for the murder & forced removal of the Native Quom people from whats left of their land.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:33 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Biguggy

    The RG politicians and the RG trolls keep referring to UNGA 2065. I believe it is now irrelevant (to use the word of the UN Secretary General). However even if it is/were still relevant it only 'invited' the UK and RGland to find a 'peaceful' solution to their 'problems'.
    As late as earlier this year the UK tried to do this again and Timberhead walked away in front of the world.
    There has not been a UNGA resolution directly mentioning the Falklands since 1988, after which the UK and RGland did start talking, guess who walked out of those talks and tore up the agreements that had been reached up to that point.

    RG trolls frequently claim that UNGA resolutions have been made since 1982 which favour RG land. However on being requested to provide the references for these they have, so far, always failed to answer. Can anyone give me a reference to a UNGA resolution that does favour RGland over the UK on the matter of the Falklands, the ones issued between 1983 and 1988, as I read them were neutral?
    There are however several UNGA resolutions which favour the rights of the Islanders' to self-determination, the last one being 67/134 from the end of last year, which in paragraph 7(c) very clearly states that the 'populations' of the NSGTs' do have the right to self-determination. This resolution, together with very similar resolutions, issued annually, was voted 'for' by Argentina. Therefore very strongly suggesting that Argentina does in fact support the Islanders' rights to self determination.
    I believe that right was exercised earlier this year in the referendum held in the Islands. Game over RGland.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 06:26 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • british bomber

    The rgs are attacking us. We should answer with air strikes against ba.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 06:31 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    Perhaps Argentina should practice what it preaches.

    UN CHarter

    7. Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter;

    United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2131(XX). Declaration on the Inadmissibility of Intervention in the Domestic Affairs of States and the Protection of Their Independence and Sovereignty
    Ref.: 2225(XXI)
    The General Assembly,
    Deeply... ...without distinction of any kind,
    Reaffirming the principle of non-intervention, proclaimed in the charters of the Organization of American States, the League of Arab States and the Organization of African Unity and affirmed at the conferences held at Montevideo, Buenos Aires, Chapultepec and Bogot , as well as in the decisions of the Asian-African Conference at Bandung, the First Conference of Heads of State or Government of Non-Aligned Countries at Belgrade, in the Programme for Peace and International Cooperation adopted at the end of the Second Conference of Heads of State or Government of Non-Aligned Countries at Cairo, and in the declaration on subversion adopted at Accra by the Heads of State and Government of the African States,
    Recognizing that full observance of the principle of the non-intervention of States in the internal and external affairs of other States is essential to the fulfilment of the purposes and principles of the United Nations,
    Considering further that direct intervention, subversion and all forms of indirect intervention are contrary to these principles and, consequently, constitute a violation of the Charter of the United Nations,
    Mindful that violation of the principle of non-intervention poses a threat to the independence, freedom and normal political, economic, social and

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 06:54 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Brit Bob

    I firmly believe that there are people in the Argentine government that have constantly demonstrated that they have mental health issues and need treatment as a matter of urgency.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 07:39 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Steveu

    “I’ve tried to have UN resolutions complied which is precisely that Argentina and UK sit down and start negotiations regarding the sovereignty controversy over the Malvinas, but not even that have we been able to achieve, and they insist in arming the Islands when we have repeatedly shown we are a peaceful nation”

    The small matter of a referendum and sending your pet monkey to London to be shown a masterclass in how to do diplomacy by William Hague. Oh yes - and “peaceful” as in 1982!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 07:43 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • GeoffWard2

    It's possible that nobody at the conference understands the difference between nuclear-powered and nuclear-armed.

    And I guess Argentina is attempting to create a latam bloc to stop any type of nuclear vessel transiting Cape Horn.

    As regards Brasil's nuclear-powered programme - perhaps CFK is attempting to slow down or stop in its tracks Brasil's relative advancement.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 08:03 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Britworker

    They really don't like our world class state of the art nuclear submarines do they, I wonder why? Oh yes, the last time they met one out submarines it blew up 600 of their sailors. Big shame, that's what you get when you attack peaceful people.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 08:15 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Viva Las Falklands

    The Argentine leader likes to stick to her favourite saying - Bullshit baffles Brains.
    The argentine people are up to their eyeballs in bullshit by now

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 08:26 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Martin Woodhead

    Uk military presence deters argentina from even thinking about trying something.
    they hate that fact

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 08:36 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • GFace

    No talk about how they militarized the Islands in 1982, unmarked landmines, military assets danger-close to civilians, using civilians as human shields., and how great they thought it was then by cheering on the Junta and how great they truly think the Junta was even today by celebrating it with a 2-peso coin.

    @10. Argentine officially vacated 2065 in February when they walked a way form talks that took the full context of the resolution into consideration. They won't go to the ICJ either. As such they have effectively vacated their claim of the Islands and should be seen as such. Of course CFK needs to ring the bell to make her little pavlovian dogs drool so they avoid seeing what she's doing domestically so the Islands will always be on the agenda -- even though they care not a whipstitch about getting them back. Fascists leading sheeple.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 08:50 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Escoses Doido

    Agreed. This, and future argentinian governments need the Falklands to continue as they are.

    They will always be able to use the 'little sister lost' idea on their people, to their advantage, as and when required.

    The malvinas myth will always be such a useful tool for them.......

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 08:59 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    12 Terence Hill continued
    cultural development of countries, particularly those which have freed themselves from colonialism, and can pose a serious threat to the maintenance of peace,
    Fully aware of the imperative need to create appropriate conditions which would enable all States, and in particular the developing countries, to choosewithout duress or coercion their own political, economic and social institutions,
    In the light of the foregoing considerations, solemnly declares:
    1. No State has the right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever, in the internal or external affairs of any other State. Consequently, armed intervention and all other forms of interference or attempted threats against the personality of the State or against its political, economic and cultural elements, are condemned.
    2. No State may use or encourage the use of economic, political or any other type of measures to coerce another State in order to obtain from it the subordination of the exercise of its sovereign rights or to secure from it advantages of any kind. Also, no State shall organize, assist, foment, Finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.
    3. The use of force to deprive peoples of their national identity constitutes a violation of their inalienable rights and of the principle of non-intervention.
    4. The strict observance of these obligations is an essential condition to ensure that nations live together in peace with one another, since the practice of any form of intervention not only violates the spirit and letter of the Charter of the United Nations but also leads to the creation of situations which threaten international peace and security.
    5. Every State has an inalienable right to choose its political, economic, social and cultural systems, without interference in any form by another State.
    6. All States shall

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 09:13 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Conqueror

    Why aren't there any argie bullshitters? Apologies to anyone whose point(s) I repeat. “When one wants to solve a conflict and gives someone else the right to veto, surely the problem will not be solved. We live in a complicated world, with bad interpretations and you see the global powers' inability to solve conflicts that are making humanity bleed”. The thing is, you dozy cow, that the permanent members of the UN Security Council have demonstrated their willingness to fight for the common good. Even if tempered by national interests. Argieland has never demonstrated anything except corruption, criminality, degeneracy, depravity, larceny, mendacity, xenophobia. Not to mention genocide. And if the United Kingdom sends nuclear-powered submarines to the Falkland Islands, so what? There's no international law or treaty that says it can't. And there are NO binding UN resolutions that the require the UK to “negotiate” with argieland. Would the UK agree to “negotiate” with a criminal “state” in direct opposition to the wishes of the Islanders and the UN Charter? I think not.
    At which point did a “state” waging an economic war become “peaceful”?
    But the world can give itself a plus point. It even permits a corrupt, criminal, rogue “state” to have a chance at sitting at the Security Council table and learning to put the world first. Unfortunately, argieland isn't up to it. Corruption, criminality, degeneracy, depravity, injustice, larceny, mendacity, self-interest come first. Argieland should NEVER be permitted access to the Security Council again. In fact, it should be expelled from the UN. If I were at the UN, I would demand the argieland be refused admittance.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 09:23 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Rufus

    As a practical point, since 1998 (and the retirement of the WE.177C from RAF bases in Germany) the UK has had only one type of nuclear weapon.

    The physics package is attached to a missile that has an admitted range of 11,000 km.

    The distance between the centre of Buenos Aires and the one submarine with a known position (HMS Vengeance - undergoing a scheduled refit in HMNB Devonport) is approximately 10,850km.

    Could someone explain why exactly would the UK bother sending a nuclear armed submarine to the South Atlantic again?

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 09:41 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    21 Terence Hill continued
    respect the right of self-determination and independence of peoples and nations, to be freely exercised without any foreign pressure, and with absolute respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. Consequently, all States shall contribute to the complete elimination of racial discrimination and colonialism in all its forms and manifestations.
    7. For the purpose of the present Declaration, the term “State” covers both individual States and groups of States.
    8. Nothing in this Declaration shall be construed as affecting in any manner the relevant provisions of the Charter of the United Nations relating to the maintenance of international peace and security, in particular those contained in Chapters VI, VII and VIII.
    1408th plenary meeting
    21 December 1965

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 10:29 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    Just got back from shopping with her in doors. Guess what flew up the High Street at about 200 feet, swear to god, it was “the” Vulcan. Wife gave me a bollocking for knocking the kids over and behaving like a big kid myself!

    Took me back forty years seeing them being flight tested over Swinderby!

    What as it got to do with militarisation, ferk all, just like the UK in the S Atlantic.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 11:45 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Mastershake

    LOL @ Argentina!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 12:20 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • troyfreefly

    England denies sending a nuclear sub to patrol the Falklands. Personally, I would rather see some squadrons of Tornados and Typhoons based there.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 12:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • malicious bloke

    “England” denies nothing. The British ministry of defense refuses to comment either way.

    Why should they feel like they have to assuage the paranoid brainwank of some congenital liars?

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 12:46 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    It is well known that since 1982 there is a nuclear hunter killer permenantly on patrol in the South Atlantic, just in case. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.

    Okay, so there is not a killer permenantly on patrol down there, then again there maybe! Or maybe not!

    Don't you just love the conundrum they face!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 01:01 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • agent999

    26 Mastershake

    I love the comment:-
    “Parker called the consequences predicted by Argentina ”speculative, hyperbolic, and almost entirely of the Republic's own making.“”

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 01:08 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    I have a question?

    Why would a region that does not have and does not intend to have Nuclear Weapons in the region feel there is a necessity to hold conferences on the subject?

    I mean here am I a layman and even I know that the only threat to a nuclear armed power, is another nuclear armed power.

    Why would those powers even consider targeting someone that does not even comes close to being the ultimate threat to them?

    The answer is obvious, they would not.

    It's just another red herring being introduced into the dispute and I would not be surprised if the whole conference was not organised by the the Argentines.

    Second question.

    How many of these conferences took place at the height of the the cold war, pre 1982?

    Was it not as important then, when there were more of the damn things in circulation?

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 01:36 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • JohnCFI

    It was only last year that the Argentine Defence Minister stated publically that 'were it not for the British Armed Forces in the Falklands we would take it by force'. I wonder if there is an ulterior motive in wanting British forces out of the area.

    Hmmmmm, I wonder!!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 01:37 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • golfcronie

    I think CFK must be frustrated, english meat might do the trick, or maybe not.
    Seriously does anyone take her seriously, ( I hope not for the sake of Argentina )
    Again I think it is time for another military junta to take a grip of the country.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 01:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pete Bog

    “We live in a complicated world, with bad interpretations ”

    Yes, Ms Botox, you are highly skilled at 'bad interpretations' of history and UN documents.

    “Likewise she called on the world and global powers to demand a “South Atlantic without nuclear weapons”

    Well that's OK as the UK have no nuclear weapons in the South Atlantic, but it is amusing that the UK's double bluff in refusing to confirm or deny this, gives RG land the impression they are there.

    Good though that CFK is too stupid to realise that UK's Trident would be totally ineffective if based in the South Atlantic. Surely her defence staff are not so spaced out that they misunderstand the consequences of a conventional retaliation by the UK if the boneheads attack again?

    “ and they insist in arming the Islands when we have repeatedly shown we are a peaceful nation”

    Might be helpful to put some precise dates here, Ms Botox as Argentina has repeatedly shown in the past she is rarely peaceful.

    “We have to arm ourselves, but with new ideas”

    Like talking to the Falkland Islanders, apologising for the 1982 war, and stop calling them implants and squatters?

    Naaaaaa that's optimistic impossibility.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 01:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • GFace

    @34 “Good though that CFK is too stupid to realise that UK's Trident would be totally ineffective if based in the South Atlantic. Surely her defence staff are not so spaced out that they misunderstand the consequences of a conventional retaliation by the UK if the boneheads attack again?”

    Naaaaaa.... I'm giving them credit for not being that stupid. They know what's up. But they are running these false narrative for the befit of the suckers back home who drool whenever the Malvinas bell is rung who either don't or whose thought processes are shredded the moment someone says the “M” word through years and years of indoctrination.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 02:01 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Ramon

    I really like the bit about Argentina is “profoundly compliant with International law”. Can we get LAN, REPSOL etc to confirm this?

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 02:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    These Latams should thank god that they never spent fifty years living under the fear of nuclear annihilation and stop making obscene politics with something they have been lucky enough to have nothing at all to do with!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 02:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • agent999

    What is it with all these South American countries that they put up with and fawn all over CFK and Argentina?

    CFK and Argentina break all local and international agreements, have an economy that has more problems than any of their neighbours.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 02:46 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • slattzzz

    listen if a nuclear sub was in the South Atlantic, they could sail round the cape up and down the rg coast and probably sit on the bottom of the River Plate till the cows come home and Rgenweener would never know anything about it, there's probably one there now doing blade counts and photographing everything that moves in and out of rg waters and I say once again there is no need for a bomber to go anywhere near the SA to wipe out BA, they wouldn't need to go further than the bay of Biscay, MBOA get over it and stop spouting pish. Why don't you ask the US and China how many nuclear subs they have in the South Atlantic at the moment stupid bitch

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 02:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check


    She is depending on Uruguay to inform her when they next detect one.

    Manuel, Diego, Rodrigues, Alejandro, pronto, man zee glass bottom boats!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 03:06 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • slattzzz

    I could send an email to the rg embassy in London and claim to have inside info that HMS Conqueror is sat in the River Plate and it would be all over the rg papers next morning

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 03:17 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    Why not tell them that HMS Victory sailed last week and is expected to arrive in the area by mid November, silly sods probably believe that too!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 03:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • slattzzz

    Or HMS Renown is not in fact paid off in Rosyth but is a born again battleship powered by two nuclear reactors and fitted with 108 harpoon and tomahawk missiles of which 50% are nuclear tipped.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 03:39 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • jwolf

    She was quoted as saying the British are “arming the Malvinas.” I looked all over the South Atlantic map and could find no such place. I did see some islands off the coast of Argentina. But they belong to Great Britain. They're called the FALKLAND ISLANDS.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 03:52 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    God forbid that they should ever learn that HMS Renown has been fitted with a 150 odd, radar directed, narrow beam sulphur dioxide gaseous projectors!

    Sailors arses to you and me, normally requiring a damn good run ashore for optimum and maximum range effectiveness.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 03:59 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • slattzzz

    @45 rumour has it HMS Alliance in Gosport is in fact a rubber mock up ....the real one is at sea

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:01 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Byron

    I seem to remember that 2 years ago the Argentine's mentioned how their own nuclear sub would be built in the not too distant future...

    I guess CFK has a short memory. As for no racial conflicts, really? so the Toba etc are happy to have their hunting grounds seized by hispanic Soya farmers as they are left to starve? I guess it helps reduce racial conflict if you've already exterminated most of them in the last 500 years and only welcomed white / hispanic immigrants. Even some of them had a few issues (like death) when they decided to recolonise a few acres of BA parkland a couple of years ago.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    I am surprised the MoD did not adopt the plan I sent them in my last letter.

    You know the one, the one where I suggested capturing whales, tattooing an RN Ensign on their arse and releasing them in thevSouth Atlantic!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:14 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Be serious

    She finally seems to be getting it. It's been a slow process but she is beginning to realise that the Falkland Islands will never be Argentine.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    She does not give a shit about the Falkland Islands, all she cares about is distracting those poor sods from the truth, Spanish also catching on.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:20 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • slattzzz

    As head of the UNSC at the mo shouldn't she be thinking about kids getting gassed in Syria or is that down the pecking order for the bitch

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:23 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • malicious bloke

    @51 the use of chemical weapons in Syria is troubling for sure but I heard that the English are letting the Syrian rebels keep a large cache of chemical weapons on the falkland islands!

    The UNSC should definitely be planning to deploy peacekeeping forces, not to Damascus or Aleppo, but to Stanley! This is of vital importance to the world!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:35 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pirate Love

    would this be the same woman crying ‘militarization’ that is thinking of buying spains redundant warplanes??

    the difference being UKs measures are for defence only, Argentinas....well,lets just say they have an ongoing proven historic agenda??

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:39 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    It!s all subjective anyway, because after the hard lessons learned from 82 and no longer having our NATO commitments in Europe, the UK could and would deploy, redeploy all forces at its disposal to repel any attack against the the Falklands.

    In short and to summarise, we would this time, make the the last conflict look like a pillow fight!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 04:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Sir Digby chicken Ceaser

    Oi Kirchner, noooooo! If you have the proof that the UK has nuclear weapons in the South Atlantic then prove or SHATUP you plastic faced tart.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:08 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • slattzzz

    @54 correct and the sooner those losers realise that the better. ALL our troops are battle hardened veterans and wont be so merciful this time, CFK needs to think about that, we have learned our lessons since the Falklands they have NOT !!!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:11 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Marcos Alejandro

    The emperor Camoron has no clothes

    Ambassador Alicia Castro was right!
    Only a prat walks in public with a Mickey Mouse towel...wait a Mr. Camoron :-)))))))))))

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • slattzzz

    @57 wow cheers marcos you have just justified what we have been saying all through this thread, dickhead now off to bed theres a good girl

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Sir Digby chicken Ceaser

    57, You must have literally no life what so ever.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Marcos Alejandro

    Stop messing with women's razors Mr. Camoron.

    “Camoron Mickey Mouse look”

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • slattzzz

    @57 here we are discussing about kids getting gassed in Syria and what we should do about it and all you can come up with is an article about a 46 year old man taking his shirt off in public you sad twat, ps he's still got better tits than CFK now fook off

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    Marcos, you are such a fuckingdickhead, with all that is going on, you come up with a story about Cameron wearing shorts!

    Shit if I ever had any doubts that you lived in the UK you certainly dispelled them.

    You old man have become an English eccentric!!!! you have deffinately been here too long, time you considered returning to the motherland and taking your English family with you.

    Only I suspect her in doors will not go with you!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:34 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Marcos Alejandro

    Would you like to discuss about tens of thousand of innocents civilians killed by Britain in Iraq perhaps?
    Did you find the WMD?

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:35 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    I would like to discuss the 30,000 Argentines your own goverment killed.

    No weapons of mass destruction there either.

    Why we are it what was your old ans involvement in it, must have been bad for him to seek political asylum in the UK?

    Don't tell me? He was the pilot!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:45 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Sir Digby chicken Ceaser

    63, Got any evidence to back that up?

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    Course he has, he read it in the Guardian!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Sir Digby chicken Ceaser

    66, which used Wikipedia as the source.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 05:55 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    Nah, Greenwald, scratch yor eyes out you bullies!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 06:04 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • slattzzz

    @63 can you convince me it was just Brits that killed all them 30,000 Iraqis. NO, however can you convince me it WASN'T JUST the rgs that killed 30,000 of their own people? NO thought not now off to bed there's a good girl

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 06:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • FI_Frost

    @63 Marcos

    Table 6 is ready to order. After which, chef wants you to chop some more onions. Off you pop.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 06:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    Nearly Sunday mate!
    Time to pop round the corner shop and paper bill!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 06:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • ChrisR

    I think the argies were confused when the “consultant” aiding their “update” of the old 1983 TR1700s to NUCLEAR said that they expected “trouble with kettling” unless something was done.

    They thought he was on about a cup of mate!

    You have to laugh or you would cry.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 06:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Falkland Islands

    Marcos Alej and Ro could you please explain why you have a fetish about our Prime Minister? I think you fancy him..

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 06:52 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • slattzzz

    @73 cos he lives just down the road hasn't been near rgenweener for years, I reckon he's a stalker

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 06:54 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Falkland Islands

    @ 74 marcos acts like a stalker. Maybe he took the pics!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 07:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • reality check

    Some one ought to tell his local bobby!

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 07:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Frank

    I just did a google on 'ONAPAL conference' and the only links it found were all to Mercopress......some conference.... I wonder who fronted, apart from the chick who may or may not be from Costa Rica.

    Aug 23rd, 2013 - 10:19 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • british bomber

    Reality check 25. We should send that Vulcan down to ba and drop the big one on them. Finish what we started in 1982.

    Aug 24th, 2013 - 02:28 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Be serious

    Argyland and Nigeria are officially the most corrupt countries on earth.

    Aug 24th, 2013 - 02:55 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Escoses Doido

    Yer right about Nigeria, - I know the place well-well.

    It's their culture to be corrupt.

    Aug 24th, 2013 - 03:16 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • inthegutter

    #63 Still refusing to answer any of my questions from the other thread I see, coward.

    As much as I despise the Tories and Cameron they are infinitely preferable to the utter scum in charge of Argentina.

    Aug 24th, 2013 - 03:37 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Conqueror

    @63 Why don't we talk about the tens of thousands of your own people you've killed? Do YOU enjoy walking over the blood and bones of those you've murdered? Been doing it for several hundred years now, haven't you? Not in the best position to point a finger are you?

    Watch that last one. You'll be able watch the indigenous population decrease as they get murdered by state agencies. Check the Federal Police. That's a joke. Federal Killers is more like it!

    Aug 24th, 2013 - 08:10 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Faz

    Oi Marcos! On your doorstep - how about this:-

    “As many Argentinians either believe that the majority of the indigenous have died out or are on the verge of doing, or 'their descendants' assimilated into Western civilisation many years ago, they wrongly hold the idea that there are no indigenous people in their country. The use of pejorative terms likening the indigenous to lazy, idle, dirty, ignorant and savage are part of the everyday language in Argentina. Due to these incorrect stereotypes many indigenous have over the years been forced to hide their identity in order to avoid being subjected to racial discrimination.
    As of 2011 many natives were still being denied land and human rights. Many of the Toba Qom native community had been struggling to protect the land they claim as ancestral territory and even the lives of its members. A leader of the Aboriginal Community Felix Diaz claimed that his people were being denied medical assistance, did not have much access to drinking water and traders keep raising food prices. He also claimed judges would not even hear the native's complaints.”

    Aug 24th, 2013 - 10:18 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    She is so obsessed with the British

    Jealousy amongst losers always did have these side effects.,
    Self obsession and envy of the deluded ...

    Aug 26th, 2013 - 03:02 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Frank

    @63 Oi... Marco.... what about this then...

    Aug 26th, 2013 - 08:12 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • danvan

    If I were the president of Argentina, I would resort to Guerrilla marketing tactics for policy communication and diplomacy given my weak bargaining position But I would do it in such as way not to leave me the laughing stock of the UN. Perhaps in the same vein she hired a British airline company to travel on state business, she might consult with Sir Richard Branson on how to use such marketing tactics for long-term success.

    Aug 27th, 2013 - 11:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    She already is the laughing stock of the UN

    Aug 28th, 2013 - 02:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Martin Woodhead

    Is really the last word on this

    Aug 29th, 2013 - 04:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!