The risks to public health from fracking for shale gas are low, according to a new official report. Any problems publicized so far - such as in the US - are the result of operational failure or poor regulation according to a study, by Public Health England, an agency of the Department of Health, reviewed the latest research.
The report focused on the risks of emissions of the chemicals used in fracking and radioactive material released with the gas and the central conclusion is that "potential risks to public health from exposure to the emissions associated with shale gas extraction are low if the operations are properly run and regulated". The report recommends environmental monitoring through the lifetime of any project and public disclosure of chemicals used in the fracking fluid. Environmental campaigners opposed to fracking say the study highlights the risks and the lack of oversight. So far exploratory fracking in the UK has been limited to one site in Lancashire but the British Geological Survey (BGS) estimates UK shale could yield 150 billion cubic meters of gas, so commercial interest is growing. The report draws on American research to conclude that though pollutants can enter the air from gas flaring or leaks, "these emissions are relatively small, intermittent and certainly not unique to shale gas extraction…" One quoted study - from the Barnett Shale in Texas in 2010 - found 70 individual volatile organic compounds including ethane, propane, butane and pentanes close to shale gas activity but observed these to be "localized" and significantly diminished downwind. But the authors recognize that there is relatively little evidence to go on - the only detailed peer reviewed study of the impact of air emissions was published last year by the Colorado School of Public Health. That work found that people living within half-a-mile of gas wells had an elevated risk of health conditions including neurological and respiratory effects. However the Colorado study was criticized for having a small sample size and the Public Health England report says local weather and topography may mean that similar results may not be likely in Britain. The PHE report acknowledges that extracting shale gas could produce residues containing naturally-occurring radioactive materials - but it argues that these risks would be similar to those in the existing oil and gas industry. On the dangers of groundwater being contaminated, the study quotes a 2011 paper by MIT researchers who found that nearly half of 43 pollution incidents were related to drilling operations - mainly because of faulty sealing of wells. According to the PHE study, American experience points to surface spills of chemicals being the most likely to affect water sources. However it points out that 99% of drinking water in England comes from heavily-regulated water companies so the risk is "considered minimal". The remainder who get their water from private wells are "particularly vulnerable" - but "high quality well integrity" should protect water sources.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!
So far exploratory fracking in the UK has been limited to one site in LancashireNov 02nd, 2013 - 12:06 am 0
Pray do tell us about the earthquakes it caused...and how it had to be shut down...
Tremors felt at Blackpool Tower even..if I remember correctly...
@1 ...and how it had to be shut down... Thereby giving the impression that the authorities had to step in. Unfortunately, Quadrilla Resources, the company involved, voluntarily suspended activities and conducted an investigation. Two earthquakes with magnitudes of 2.3 and 1.5. But then, earthquakes with magnitudes of 3.0 or less are unlikely to be felt by people.Nov 02nd, 2013 - 10:20 am 0
@1 A_VoiceNov 02nd, 2013 - 10:59 am 0
There are between 200-250 earthquakes in the UK EVERY year!
Of course most of them are below 3.0 in magnitude, so go unnoticed.
A_Voice - you really must try harder or La Campora won't pay you any more.