New York state supreme court has rejected an appeal to re-evaluate a state law that requires internet retailers like Amazon and Overstock.com to pay sales tax in the state. The law forces internet retailers to collect taxes on purchases in New York
The case could set a precedent in the US, where an estimated 23bn dollars a year is lost in uncollected sales tax. Amazon argued it shouldn't pay the tax as it doesn't have a physical presence in the state.
Both Amazon and Overstock.com brought separate cases against the law, which were joined into one ruling. Neither company has any distribution facilities in New York.
They argued the law violated a 1992 US Supreme Court ruling which orders mail-order retailers to pay sales tax if they have physical presence in a state.
Amazon said New York's regulations subject internet retailers to significant burdens of pain on serious civil and criminal penalties, according to a court filing.
The New York law says sales tax must be collected if a local resident is used to solicit sales online - which Amazon does, as it partners with local businesses to host ads promoting the retailer.
A lower court ruled this effectively creates an in-state sales force.
Overstock.com suspended its local affiliate program once the law was passed to avoid paying sales tax. New York State lost estimated 1.8bn dollars in uncollected sales tax in 2012, according to the National Conference on State Legislatures.
The law is part of a series of legislation passed in several US states dubbed Amazon laws because they specifically target large online retailers.
Amazon has already agreed to pay sales tax in the 16 states in which it does have distribution centers, and has said it supports a federal law which would give states the right to collect sales tax on online retailers with at least 1m in out-of-state sales.
However, not all retailers support the agreement, and online auction site eBay has indicated it would oppose any such measure. Globally, Amazon has come under fire for not paying enough tax.
Its UK subsidiary paid £2.4m in corporate taxes last year, despite making sales of £4.3bn, prompting one politician to call the amount pathetic.
In France, the government has retaliated against Amazon for collecting sales tax in Luxembourg, where rates are lower, by imposing restrictions on the amount the firm can discount books and prohibiting free shipping.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rules20th century laws and taxes catching up with 21st century reality.
Dec 03rd, 2013 - 10:19 am 0So if I live in upstate NY and my closest grocery store is just over the boarder the sales tax that is collected at the store by the store to be dispersed locally should be remitted to NY? Yeah... That's how it works.
Dec 03rd, 2013 - 01:55 pm 0Internet sales tax should be collected and disperse at the location of the vendor like all other sales taxes. The knots apologists have to twist themselves into just proves the amazon tax an interstate tarrif -- or everyone who has to commute to shop is a tax evador esp. when they pay sales tax to the community that makes business happen (as so it should be).
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!