Scientists have identified four new man-made gases that are contributing to the depletion of the ozone layer. Two of the gases are accumulating at a rate that is causing concern among researchers. Worries over the growing ozone hole have seen the production of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) gases restricted since the mid 1980s
But the precise origin of these new, similar substances remains a mystery, say scientists.
Lying in the atmosphere, between 15 and 30km above the surface of the Earth, the ozone layer plays a critical role in blocking harmful UV rays, which cause cancers in humans and reproductive problems in animals.
Scientists from the British Antarctic Survey were the first to discover a huge hole in the ozone over Antarctica in 1985. The evidence quickly pointed to CFC gases, which were invented in the 1920s, and were widely used in refrigeration and as aerosol propellants in products like hairsprays and deodorants.
Remarkably, global action was rapidly agreed to tackle CFCs and the Montreal Protocol to limit these substances came into being in 1987. A total global ban on production came into force in 2010.
Now, researchers from the University of East Anglia have discovered evidence of four new gases that can destroy ozone and are getting into the atmosphere from as yet unidentified sources.
Three of the gases are CFCs and one is a hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC), which can also damage ozone.
Our research has shown four gases that were not around in the atmosphere at all until the 1960s which suggests they are man-made, said lead researcher Dr Johannes Laube.
The scientists discovered the gases by analyzing polar firn, perennial snow pack. Air extracted from this snow is a natural archive of what was in the atmosphere up to 100 years ago.
The researchers also looked at modern air samples, collected at remote Cape Grim in Tasmania. They estimate that about 74,000 tons of these gases have been released into the atmosphere. Two of the gases are accumulating at significant rates.
The identification of these four new gases is very worrying as they will contribute to the destruction of the ozone layer, said Dr Laube.
We don't know where the new gases are being emitted from and this should be investigated. Possible sources include feedstock chemicals for insecticide production and solvents for cleaning electronic components.
What's more, the three CFCs are being destroyed very slowly in the atmosphere - so even if emissions were to stop immediately, they will still be around for many decades to come, he added.
Other scientists acknowledged that while the current concentrations of these gases are small and they don't present an immediate concern, work would have to be done to identify their origin.
This paper highlights that ozone depletion is not yet yesterday's story, said Prof Piers Forster, from the University of Leeds.
The concentrations found in this study are tiny. Nevertheless, this paper reminds us we need to be vigilant and continually monitor the atmosphere for even small amounts of these gases creeping up, either through accidental or unplanned emissions.
Of the four species identified, CFC-113a seems the most worrying as there is a very small but growing emission source somewhere, maybe from agricultural insecticides. We should find it and take it out of production”. (BBC).-
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rules“Now, researchers from the University of East Anglia have discovered evidence of four new gases that can destroy ozone and are getting into the atmosphere from as yet unidentified sources.”
Mar 11th, 2014 - 11:49 am 0Ah! The U.E.A. the well know “Global Warming, latterly “Climate Change” liars and fabricators of the data.
They are going to reap what all liars find out for themselves: nobody who knows anything about theses deceitful bastards are going to believe them.
Has any reputable organization confirmed their latest scare story? I bet not.
Actually when UEA was thoroughly and independantly investigated.
Mar 11th, 2014 - 03:40 pm 0The science was found to be sound. Only presented rather poorly.
Climate change denier bang on about how the models change.
Well of course they do as more data is collected and the models improved.
Scientific method is poorly understood by many.
And when deniers don't like the answer they question the science.
Climate science does not predict the weather but the chemical interactions between gasses, the physics of which are very well understood.
@ 2 zathras
Mar 11th, 2014 - 08:35 pm 0First paragraph: hockey stick, supported by UEA and utter bollocks as we have since found out.
“Climate science does not predict the weather but the chemical interactions between gasses, the physics of which are very well understood.”
I take it from that that you are not a scientist and have little experience.
I am a British professional Electrical Mechanical Engineer and at (almost) 68 YO am studying Astro-Physics by long distance learning from MIT (that’s the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the USA).
Care to explain some of the anomalies that UEA and the other twats made such as “it will get hotter and hotter until the temperature runs away with itself (due to CO2 in the atmosphere), when we are facing an ice-age?
Why the North Pole hasn’t melted anywhere near the “consensus” of “scientists” said it would?
I should start looking at ALL the data that is available if I were you. But you won’t will you, it would spoil the “vision” of the chief crook in this eyewash, no other than Al (billionaire after this malarkey) Gore.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!