Britain's The Guardian and The Washington Post have been awarded the most prestigious Pulitzer prize for coverage of secret surveillance by the US National Security Agency that sparked wide debate over government spying.
Reuters won in international reporting for its coverage of the violent persecution of a Muslim minority in Myanmar who in efforts to flee often fall into the hands of brutal human-trafficking networks.
The celebrated prizes, awarded by Columbia University, are the most respected in US journalism and can bring badly needed attention and recognition to newspapers and websites suffering from economic pressures and budget constraints.
The prize-winning work by the Guardian and The Washington Post in the Pulitzer's public service category was based on documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, who revealed details of global electronic surveillance by the US spy agency.
Reporting on the leaks not only sparked international debate over the limits of government surveillance but prompted President Barack Obama to introduce curbs on NSA spying powers.
We are particularly grateful for our colleagues across the world who supported the Guardian in circumstances which threatened to stifle our reporting, Guardian Editor in Chief Alan Rusbridger said in a statement.
And we share this honour, not only with our colleagues at The Washington Post, but also with Edward Snowden, who risked so much in the cause of the public service which has today been acknowledged by the award of this prestigious prize, he said.
Russia granted Snowden temporary asylum last year after the US Justice Department charged him with violating the Espionage Act.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesJust think how much more worthy of the Pulitzer the two newspapers might be if the UK and US governments had not stolen back the Snowden / Guardian evidences at Heathrow.
Apr 15th, 2014 - 10:35 am 0Good. Recognition of the favour Snowden has done us all.
Apr 15th, 2014 - 11:13 am 0This prize is well deserved. This is especially true in the case of the Guardian. I heard the Guardian's Chief Editor say that he wishes that the First Amendment existed in the UK. As it is it had to operate under the repressive regime that exists in that country.
Apr 15th, 2014 - 04:59 pm 0Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!