Bones that have littered the beaches of South Georgia for a hundred years since the animals were killed by whalers are now being used to establish what species of whale were being hunted, reports South Georgia’s April Newsletter. Read full article
Looks like Cristina expropriated all the blubber for her Botox treatments leaving only a few bones for her people to chew on. (analogy - she's not allowed on a BoT).
The study represents ‘the most comprehensive investigation of historic genetic diversity in whales from around the Antarctic region prior to commercial whaling’.
Scientists collected samples from 281 whale bones.
They successfully extracted DNA from *82%* of the samples. 50 samples were unable to be extracted.
158 were humpback whales,
51 were fin whales,
18 blue whales,
2 sei whales, and
1 southern right whale,
1 elephant seal.
DNA was extracted from 231 samples (= individual whales?), so the other 50 samples must have been ‘non-genetic’, anatomical identifications, or they did not contribute to the study.
A nice piece of forensic ecology, but very limited in its scope.
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesAre these bones redolent of Argentine ambition in the area?
May 23rd, 2014 - 12:22 am - Link - Report abuse 0South Georgia (Argentina) MercoP news, I can't wait for John N. update.
May 23rd, 2014 - 01:35 am - Link - Report abuse 0Looks like Cristina expropriated all the blubber for her Botox treatments leaving only a few bones for her people to chew on. (analogy - she's not allowed on a BoT).
May 23rd, 2014 - 03:22 am - Link - Report abuse 0ERROR IN MERCOPRESS STORY
May 23rd, 2014 - 04:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The study represents ‘the most comprehensive investigation of historic genetic diversity in whales from around the Antarctic region prior to commercial whaling’.
Scientists collected samples from 281 whale bones.
They successfully extracted DNA from *82%* of the samples. 50 samples were unable to be extracted.
158 were humpback whales,
51 were fin whales,
18 blue whales,
2 sei whales, and
1 southern right whale,
1 elephant seal.
DNA was extracted from 231 samples (= individual whales?), so the other 50 samples must have been ‘non-genetic’, anatomical identifications, or they did not contribute to the study.
A nice piece of forensic ecology, but very limited in its scope.
@2 piss off nurd.
May 24th, 2014 - 12:40 am - Link - Report abuse 0Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!