MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, April 18th 2024 - 02:39 UTC

 

 

British top commander rubbishes any Falklands' “high alert” stories

Friday, February 6th 2015 - 03:29 UTC
Full article 116 comments

The Commander of British Forces South Atlantic Islands has rubbished a story in UK The Sunday Express news paper that the Falkland Islands is on a high security alert, and made a brief comment to that respect. Read full article

Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Marcos Alejandro

    Jihadi John and his English murderous psychopaths are not here. Instead of counting penguins in Argentinean soil you should go look for your comrades in Iraq and Syria. Don't forget your mask.

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 04:23 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Skip

    No one understands you psycho bitch.

    Stop stalking.

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 05:33 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • gordo1

    @1 Marquitos Alejandrito

    What on earth do these juvenile dribbles mean?

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 07:03 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • inthegutter

    #1

    ... and yet the crimes of Islamic terrorism against UK civilians pales in comparison to what YOUR own government did to its own people.

    Moreover, civilians in your own country have in fact suffered more at the hands of Islamic terrorism than those in the UK (i.e. the AMIA bombing and the Israeli embassy attack); but worse, it looks like your current government was complicit in covering up these atrocities against Argentine citizens in favour of lucrative trade deals.

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 08:35 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • lsolde

    Marcos Alejandro is becoming more & more like paulcedron.
    His big brother, maybe?

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 09:21 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • DanyBerger

    Oh! I see....

    I’ve been for so long without reading and posting here because has become so boring, but...

    As I need a little bit of fun this article provides me de raw material for doing that....

    The commander with the thorn in his side (La Forte??? From Sicily perhaps?? or Calabria)

    The commander y with the thorn in his side
    behind the hatred there lies
    a murderous desire for love

    How can they look into his eyes
    and still they don't believe me
    how can they hear him say those words
    and still they don't believe me
    and if they don't believe him now
    will they ever believe him?
    and if they don't believe him now
    will they ever believe him?

    The commander with the thorn in his side
    behind the hatred there lies
    a plundering desire for love

    How can they see the love in his eyes
    and still they don't believe them
    and after all this time
    they don't want to believe them
    and if they don't believe them now
    will they ever believe them?
    and when you want to live
    how do you start?
    where do you go?
    who do you know?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYp2LGKOF_M

    I hope Mr. La Forte don’t start to kiss his or her troops in front of Her Glamorous Rotten Majestic Elisabeth II

    I know now the bunch of turbant users will become nasty with me...

    What can I do?

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 09:49 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Viscount Falkland

    I see La Forte is a CBE....Commander of the British Empire. Could some wag let me know what is the Argentine equivalent ? :-) He was also awarded for rescuing 3 civilians stuck up a mountain...yep...in Argentina ! Started as a humble Rock ape and now leader of the band. “Our military posture in the South Atlantic is unchanged”. This means...Mine's a Carlsberg !

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 10:10 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • CaptainSilver

    Dany, you are,such a lovely fellow. Give us a kiss…

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 10:33 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • downunder

    The security of the Falkland Islands is in very good hands! (as it should be)

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 10:34 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Conqueror

    @1. Only coming to practise. Islamic terrorists are so much smarter than argies. Keep count of how many argies go missing. Not indigenous people. Proper genocides.
    @8. Please consider what you're asking for. A stale bun!

    stale

    intransitive verb
    staled stal·ing

    Definition of STALE

    : urinate —used chiefly of camels and horses

    Origin of STALE

    Middle English; akin to Middle Low German stallen to urinate, stal urine of horses
    First Known Use: 15th century

    Think about it!

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 11:15 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • DanyBerger

    La Forte... Galtieri, Picoluzzi, Caturzzo....Uhmm!

    All came form the same southern shitty Italy and like to run faster that anyone you know?

    Fuoco!!!!!

    Screamed the Italian Generale...

    Al nemico Generale?

    asked the soldier...

    Ma sei pazzo pezzo di stronzo?

    Fuoco a le caldere collione che andiamo via prima el nemico farci cagare subito.

    Translation for monolingual Briton-Romanus from former colony of the little Italians from sicily....

    Fire!!!!!

    Screamed the General....

    To the enemy General?...

    Asked the soldier....

    But, are you crazy piece of shit???

    Fire to the engines to escape before the enemy kill us all... (I was polite here...)....

    You cannot win a war with someone called “La forte” if you know what I mean... Do ya little bastards?

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 11:42 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Conqueror

    Of course we notice that argieland is shit. Over 11,000 cowardly PoWs. That argieland didn't want back. Why oh why didn't we execute the lot. Invasion and occupation of a territory is a war crime. But, so expensive to tow a raft with them all on out to the middle of the Atlantic and sink it. Next time!

    There's a burbling sound from a staling berger. There's a solution. A gut cut.

    Then burn the guts!

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 03:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Skip

    “I’ve been for so long without reading and posting here because has become so boring, but...”

    Oh hasn't Dany been posting? I didn't realise.

    You know with 2014 finishing and 2015 starting and the Falkland Islands still being British for yet another year.

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 03:54 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • ChrisR

    The bottom line, as always, is if the argies try to attack they will get nowhere.

    I mean, how will they ever get out of the docks without their ships rolling over and the sub (they only have one semi functional sub) sinking, neve to be seen again.

    And the air force? Do rubber powered balsa models count?

    I have to laugh every time I read the comments from the trolls. Is it 23 or 25 years and counting? I lose track of this nonsense.

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 04:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    “Falklands on HIGH ALERT: Hundreds of British troops sent to Islands to boost security”

    hehe
    and then they say they are not militarizing the region...lol
    and that they want to improve the relationship with the continent...lol
    with soldiers and machine guns...lol

    must be the famous english diplomacy.

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 05:09 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    Sounds like the Sunday Express pissed out the pot....If it's true that “1.000 troops in groups of 300 are to be flown to the Falklands during the current year” and they think that represents a “significant reinforcement of troops in the Falklands”, it might be, if they were comparing the 1000 troops to the size of the glorious Argie army. The fact is that 300 troops would be enough to repeal any Argie attack.

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 05:18 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pugol-H

    @1 Marcos Alejandro
    Yeaahh, except it is not Argentinian soil, is it!

    It’s British, our gateway to Antarctica.

    @11 DanyBerger
    You’re a card and no mistake Dannyboy.

    Most of the Planter population in Argentina harken from “southern shitty Italy” at some point in their recent genetic past.

    Most of the Argentinians I’ve met have “southern shitty Italian” surnames.

    Most of those who didn’t had German ones.

    Next you will be telling us than Maradona is a Spanish name.

    Not to mention old red socks in the Vatican.

    @15 paulcedron
    We have excellent relations with everyone in S. America who matters.

    For Argentina, we have “a deterrent”, diplomacy being pointless.

    The S. Atlantic being our territory to militarise, if we so choose.

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 05:29 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    “We have excellent relations with everyone in S. America who matters.”

    and yet no country in south america recognizes the sovereignty of britain in the islets.
    and the position of the whole continent will be even harder regarding trade with the occupiers.

    next step will be banning the argentine airspace for all the flights from or to the islets.

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 06:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Clyde15

    #6/11
    Were you drunk or on mind altering substances when you penned that drivel /
    Absolutely incomprehensible.

    #18
    When is this going to happen? You have been prophesying this for years but nothing has been done by your staunch allies except having a good laugh behind your back.
    They are probably doing it to wind you up ! Look at the daft Argies jumping up and down in IMPOTENT rage. Come on, where's your sense of humour !!

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 06:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pugol-H

    18 paulcedron
    The reality is most countries support you in name only, and as Argentina implodes in yet another economic meltdown, even this tacit support is evaporating.

    Who gives shit about what Maduro has to say, now Venezuela’s “free oil for friendship” deals have collapsed.

    You are the next Venezuela, only without the vast natural resources.

    Oh, and close your airspace any time you like, this will change nothing.

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 06:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    pugol
    “The reality is most countries support you in name only,”

    who told you that?
    penguin news?
    merdopress?

    “Oh, and close your airspace any time you like, this will change nothing.”

    well, you will have to travel to chile via miami.
    that is +/- 12 hours if the flight is not delayed.
    and if LAN does not suspend all the flights to the islets.

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 06:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • CaptainSilver

    Pauly botty boy, LAN is a wonderful airline, the product of a capitalist economy. Have you ever travelled in the Dreamliner… have you EVER even been in an aeroplane? We can always travel via Santiago instead of unsafe shithole BA. Its just a small detour around your stolen territory.

    Fancied any Lamas lately, or, do you prefer the Guanaco?

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 07:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Islander1

    Paulecedron- not just name only you say? In that case please explain to me How Come both Uruguyan and Chilean Govts write either FALKAND ISLANDS or ISLAS FALKLANDS on all their customs export paperwork on all the good that come here from those 2 Countries? One of them even puts- (UK) - after it!
    I can think of routes to South America a lot shorter than via Miami and they all avoid Arg airspace.

    Please tell me also - Which groups of Argentines told Mrs K NOT to cut the flight a couple of years ago? - Your 1982 Veteran Association and also the Families Association.

    So yes- do it - instead of mouthing off about it - go on - do it.

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 10:33 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    22
    yes, it is a good airline.
    now what the fuck has that got to do with the ban of our wonderful airspace to any plane that go to the islets, you retarded isleter?

    a flight from santiago to the islets must pass through our airspace anyway.
    do you understand?
    have you ever studied geography?
    no?

    the only solution would be via miami (lol) or a transpolar flight (lol x 1 million).

    bennyhillbillies...lol

    Feb 06th, 2015 - 10:36 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • brianF.I

    @25 A charter flight into Brazil could get us to Santiago, there are far easier ways to get to Chile than via Miami you idiot. Or we can just fly to the UK and go somewhere else.

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 12:52 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    brainless FY
    1st, you are answering to yourself @25, you imbecile.
    2nd, what's your level of education? kindergarten?
    brazil would be the first in supporting argentina in this issue.
    how the fuck would they allow a flight from rio de janeiro, you nincompoop?

    an air blockade is the next step.

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 09:38 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Islander1

    26 Paulecedron- Can you answer the questions asked at 23 please and explain them?
    Oops sorry no you cannot and will not - just like Marcos and Dannyb - when challenged with facts and reality - you are all so argentine

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 10:01 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Clyde15

    #24
    a flight from santiago to the islets must pass through our airspace anyway.
    WRONG !

    If you want to fly a direct route , the answer is yes.

    However, by flying from Santiago south, cutting across Estrecho de Magallenes, this is another route well within the range of any modern airliner.
    Also, it is in Chilean airspace all the way to the Falklands

    Have YOU ever studied geography ? Obviously not !

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 10:43 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • brianF.I

    @26 Your neighbours to the north aren't as supportive as you think lol

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 12:08 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    grandpa
    you didn't even know that the islets were in south america, so you are not the most suitable to talk about geography.

    and ANY flight from chile, would go through our wonderful airspace.
    above the land or above the beautiful mar argentino.

    anyway, LAN will suspend their flights sooner than later.
    they are not economically profitable and the new policy of latin america is to isolate the islets, so there is nothing we can do against it.

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 12:12 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Islander1

    Paulecedron- Lord man- what do you smopke and where did you learn/'!!

    How can a group of Islands 400kilometers off the coats of the Continent be“in” it???????????????
    We can near it but neither in nor part of. geologically we have always been separate - you broke off SW Africa - we were dragged around from and broke off the South East side!

    You can call it mar argentino of peanut soup if you like!- does not give you legal jurisdiction over it outside your territorial limit! Not marked on many international maps as such anyway - maybe just on yours?

    What new isolation policy are you wittering on about?

    Since when have flights that are often passengers 100% full and waiting lists and even on annual average over 12 months including the winter period well over 50% plus seat occupancy - plus several tons of freight each week been uneconomic?
    Lan have a longstanding agreement with the Falklands that if their income drops below the breakeven point they would receives a subsidy form the islands Govt, That has never been asked for for about 18-20 years as it has not been needed!
    Your President asked Lan to drop the flight 2 years ago- Lan said no as it was a profitable route so why would they want to.

    But then we forget - you are an argentine - so facts must not get in the way of fantasy beliefs!

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 01:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Clyde15

    #30
    Correct, I don't know where “the islets” are but I know where the Falklands are, They are not “IN ” S.America but OFF the coast of S.America AND have been a
    British possession for well over 200 years, long before Argentina existed.

    So, in your arrogance, you are now claiming Chilean airspace as Argentinian.
    What part of the route I detailed at #28 is Argentinian Airspace ?
    I don't know the legal sovereignty limits for the Estrecho de Magallanes perhaps you could advise me on this. Legal information please, not just shooting off your mouth.
    As for YOUR mar argentino this is name given to it by your country and does not give you sovereignty apart from 22.2 km from your coast...the rest is the high seas AND International Airspace.

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 01:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    @26 Paul
    ”brazil would be the first in supporting argentina in this issue.
    how the fuck would they allow a flight from rio de janeiro, you nincompoop?

    Paul, with all due respect, you know as well as I do, it is extremely unlikely that Brazil would support Argentina on this issue. It's exactly the same thing with the 'apparent' support they give to Argentina's claim of the FI. It's only 'lip-service'.... Despite the fact that Brazil's government is an incompetent farce, they are well aware of the potentially delicate position they would put themselves in, and the negative repercussions (for Brazil) with other countries that they cannot afford to screw around with....It's known as “diplomacy”...

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 02:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pugol-H

    @Paulito
    You cannot protect your own airspace, much less “Blockade” someone else’s.

    Your immediate neighbours are far more interested in protecting their own airspaces than in any attempt to help you.

    You’re just not very popular down there, is the uncomfortable truth for you.

    Entirely possible however for the British to block all Argentine access to Antarctica, just an idle thought.

    Las islets Malvinas, Mar Argentino, Never Never Land.

    Just follow the Yellow Brick Road.

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 05:37 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • brianF.I

    @26 Lol you really have no idea Pauly, several Falkland flagged fishing vessels often call into Rio, en route from Vigo, Spain, with no hassle from the Brazilian authorities, people from the Argie embassy turned up at the dock once and tried to arrest a vessel, but were promptly told to fuck off lol.

    So yeah, lots of support for Argentina LOL. If the Brazilians don't mind our ships going to Rio, then they won't mind charter flights either. At the end of the day the Brazilians just don't care about the Falklands dispute, they simply tow the party line to keep Argentina quite.

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 06:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    Ignorant Bennys:
    LOL x 1 MILLION

    So for you, bunch of burros, Malvinas/ Falklands are not part of the South American continent because they are 300 km off the coast??

    Have you ever in your sad, ignorant life heard of geology and physiography ??
    Ehhhh?

    I do not have too much time to loose with you, bunch of burros, cause I am heading to San Rafael to surf right now.

    But read a book once in a while, or go back to a proper school.

    Those Islands are part of the Patagonian continental shelf, hence they are part of South America, and even more, they are part of Argentina, you dumbassholes.

    With your pelotuda criteria, the isla de los Estados is not in South America because it is surrounded of water?

    JAJA
    ...Benny-Hillbillies

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 06:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    When the British military goes quiet,
    then you should run,

    when they speak, its normally a polite warning to be have and don't do anything silly

    When they cry,
    ya know camarons around..lol

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 07:48 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Clyde15

    #36
    As usual, dodging the question so I will ask again.
    So, in your arrogance, you are now claiming Chilean airspace as Argentinian.
    What part of the route I detailed at #28 is Argentinian Airspace ?
    I don't know the legal sovereignty limits for the Estrecho de Magallanes perhaps you could advise me on this. Legal information please, not just shooting off your mouth.

    Maybe if you had an understanding of the English language then you would understand the meaning of the preposition IN. In your sentence it meant physically inside S.America whereas it is outside the landmass off the coast.

    If you could engage what passes as a brain in your skull, you could note that Bermuda is not classed as part of the American continent but located in the N.W.Atlantic. Similarly the Falklands are not part of the S.American continent BUT located in the S.W .Atlantic off -note that word- off the S.American continent

    ”.because they are 300 km off the coast??
    Another Paulie-ism . Are they 300 km from the mainland ?
    Probably in Argentine cartography, you are so brainwashed that you don't even know the distance they are off shore. Look at a proper map and check.
    They are approx 400km plus depending on where you draw the line.
    Enjoy paddling in the sewage

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 07:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    If 36@
    ever lost his book, the world according to Argentina, he would be very quite,

    silent and very very confused.

    still,
    anytime he wants to read the truth , all he has to do is leave Argentina.

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 08:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • brianF.I

    @36 Technically Pauly the Falklands have never been part of South America as they broke off separately from South Africa, long after South America broke away.

    Also, do you have a reply to my previous comment? or are you mentally limited by your indoctrination?

    Have fun pretending to be a surfer you loser.

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 08:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    36 paulcedron
    Wrong again as international law outweighs your biased and unqualified opinion thus:
    'International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the North Sea continental shelf cases, in which Denmark and the Netherlands based their claim inter alia on the doctrine of proximity, i.e., that the part of the continental shelf closest to the part of the state in question falls automatically under that state's jurisdiction. In these cases the ICJ rejected any contiguity type of approach. As for continuity, it is argued, the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf and Contiguous Zone, Article 1, now contained in the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, Article 76, does not support the view that coastal states have sovereignty over islands above the continental shelf. On the contary it laid down doctrine that islands had their own “continental shelves,”
    The Falklands/Malvinas Case Breaking the Deadlock in the Anglo-Argentine...
    By Roberto C. Laver

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 08:59 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Islander1

    Paulie- I see I am still waiting for the answer re the economics of the Lan flight and where your Arg airspace ends, and how you explain the level of commercial trade we have direct with Chile and Uruguay whose respective Govt departments all recognise us.

    For your info - All vessels have the right of free passage through the Straits of Magellan - signed into law by Arg and Chile and lodged at the relevant UN dept.
    I think you will also find that any airline also has the right of free passage along the centre line as well. Ok Lan would probably not do it as they have a lot to loose inside Argentina if your Govt got upset and made trouble for them. but there are other smaller Chilean airlines that do not have Arg connections who could perhaps fly such a route.
    What would you do - shoot them down? Do that and I suspect you will get your arse well smacked by the FAA de Chile - about 3 decades more modern that the FAA and and a lot more practised and professional.
    Brasil - well we have had a fair few flights in through Brazil in the last few years.

    Feb 07th, 2015 - 09:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • DanyBerger

    @Terence Hill

    “International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the North Sea continental shelf cases, in which Denmark and the Netherlands based their claim inter alia on the doctrine of proximity, i.e., that the part of the continental shelf closest to the part of the state in question falls automatically under that state's jurisdiction.”!

    This is in Europe boy and has noting to do with America another continent with different rules...

    And if the Argies say that you are in they continental shelf there is noting you can do.

    Soon or later you will have to obey argie rule or face the consequences.

    Feb 08th, 2015 - 07:52 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • lsolde

    @43 DanyBerger,
    “Soon or later you will have to obey argie rule or face the consequences”
    ls that so?
    Are you a comedian, Dany boy?
    You are impotent with your stupid argie law, as you cannot enforce it.
    And it doesn't apply to us anyway, in OUR OWN country.
    What are you going to do, Danybaby?
    Swim out here & arrest us all?
    You really are a right Pillock.
    Go back to sleep.

    Feb 08th, 2015 - 09:19 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • DanyBerger

    @lsolde

    Be patient Isolde , be patient....

    Feb 08th, 2015 - 01:27 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • brianF.I

    @45 You are a retard

    Feb 08th, 2015 - 05:40 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    isolda...isolda...

    it is not a question of argentine laws.
    it is an international issue.
    the whole world goes to a massive decolonization, supported by the vast majority of the countries, except england of course.

    it is unacceptable that in the 21st century, england still have 16 colonies.
    sooner than later malvinas will be part of argentina again and, of course, it will be the same with gibraltar and northern ireland, etc.

    but i guess you all will always be welcomed by england...l
    well, maybe not.

    Feb 08th, 2015 - 06:59 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Captain Byron

    47. Please stop colonising indigenous lands before accusing others....

    http://www.themodernsurvivalist.com/archives/3872 the photo says it all.

    http://www.themodernsurvivalist.com/archives/3872

    Similar stories have cropped up a number of times in the Kirchner years, and follow centuries of natives being oppressed / neglected / lands stolen, mostly since your independence.

    Any of the 16 you mention is free to call a vote and leave if they wish, following the Scottish example. Like Scotland they probably realise the benefits of staying with us.

    Feb 08th, 2015 - 07:59 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    47
    Britain has not/do not colonies countries,

    Argentina on the other hand want to colonies the whole of south America,

    Feb 08th, 2015 - 08:43 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • mollymauk

    47 - is French Guiana acceptable to you, or do you have another website where you pursue that issue?

    Feb 08th, 2015 - 09:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Islander1

    Paulie- We are still waiting for you to answer me? - or maybe DannyB can - he is in the same fantasy land as you.

    Paul - tell me what would the Islands be if taken over against the will and wishes of the people by a foreign power ?
    I will tell you - the word begins with a “C” - got it yet?

    Feb 08th, 2015 - 09:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pete Bog

    @43
    “Soon or later you will have to obey argie rule or face the consequences.”

    What, having burning tyre smoke blown over from Tyre del Fuego?
    Wave thousands of white flags?
    Be invaded by rowing boats?

    Your colonialist dreams belong in the past.

    Feb 08th, 2015 - 10:04 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    47 paulcedron
    I have just shown that an Argentine claim to the Islands based on proximity has been rejected by ICJ(post 41) based on the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, Article 76. Since the UK can rely on at least six aspects of international law in support of her right of sovereignty, while Argentina has no such support. The UK's position is both permanent and unassailable, as all her acts have been in conformity with her UN Charter obligations. Moreover, the Referendum as an act of self-determination, met all the legal criteria of decolonization. Your claim of a so called “international issue”, merely falls into the realm of politicking. It is therefore by its very nature transient, and will pass eventually as more bona fide issues engage the UN's attention.

    Feb 09th, 2015 - 12:47 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • lsolde

    @45 DanyBerger,
    So what you really mean to say, Danyboy, is that you know that you can do nothing but bluster & like other malvinistas, are hoping for a miracle.
    You are hoping, just like that brainless monologue, Hepatia, that the UK will just say“oh OK, Argentina, we're going, come & get these lslands & don't care about the people there!” Not going to happen, Dans, old son.
    @ 47 paulcedron,
    Oh of course, that makes a difference, the “whole world” sees the great injustice done to poor, poor Argentina.
    Those dastardly Falklanders won't let Argentina establish a colony in the Falklands.
    So now, of course, you can't begin to plunder Antarctica(which also does not belong to you).
    You really should get someone to proof read the rubbish that you write.
    You last post suggests that Argentina will acquire Northern lreland, Gibraltar etc.
    Don't know what etc contains? Maybe the lsle of Man?
    And lastly paul-no hope, it is unacceptable in the 21st century for Argentina to keep “claiming” other people's land.
    What is Argentina's next ridiculous “claim”--the moon?
    Well it shines on Argentina, so it must be yours?
    ldiot boy.

    Feb 09th, 2015 - 06:07 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • CKurze30k

    @43: “Soon or later you will have to obey argie rule or face the consequences.”

    Wrong. “argie rule” would be the enforecement of a colonial situation, something that will never be allowed to happen.

    “Consequences”? You mean like the illegal occupation of 1982, where the legitimate inhabitants of the Falklands who tried to uphold their rights were put on a list for return to the mainlands (and no doubt, eventual murder)?

    It's the Falkland Islander's choice to associate with Argentina or not. Threatening consequences for refusing a colonial situation is immoral.

    @47:
    “...the whole world goes to a massive decolonization, supported by the vast majority of the countries, except england of course.”

    Britain has asked each of its Overseas Territories their desires. Each have excercised (or will, in the case of those not yet asked) their right to self-determination and as such, are decolonised.

    “...it is unacceptable that in the 21st century, england still have 16 colonies.”

    Good thing they're not colonies then, they're Overseas Territories to which Britain holds rightful sovereignty (Something Argentina cannot claim about the Falklands without it being a lie).

    Each territory that has chosen to keep their links with us are accurately described as decolonised, as self-determination is a large part of decolonisation. This includes the British Falklands.

    “sooner than later malvinas will be part of argentina again”

    Sorry, no “again”, since it's never been yours to begin with. Please stop lying about this.

    Feb 09th, 2015 - 08:58 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    isolda
    behave missy!
    and stop insulting.

    as for: “You last post suggests that Argentina will acquire Northern lreland, Gibraltar etc.”
    wot?
    who said that?
    YOU, because you have the typical english colonialista mind.
    NI will return to its authentic owners: The Republic of Ireland, and it will be the same with Gibraltar / Spain, and Malvinas / Argentina.
    understand now, iso?

    Feb 09th, 2015 - 12:08 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    56 paulcedron
    The Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland and UK governments are bound by the Good Friday Agreement (GFA) or Belfast Agreement
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Friday_Agreement.
    Spain and the UK are bound Treaty of Utrecht which was to petuity.
    Argentina is prohibited from any claim to the Islands under the Treaty of Utrecht: “...neither the Catholic King, nor any of his heirs and successors whatsoever, shall sell, yield, pawn, transfer, or by any means, or under any name, alienate from them and the crown of Spain, to the French, or to any other nations whatever, any lands, dominions, or territories, or any part thereof, belonging to Spain in America. ...”

    Feb 09th, 2015 - 02:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Monkeymagic

    Paul condom

    ....And Argentina will return to its authentic owners...the Amerindians.

    Or perhaps...as the entire world agreed when they signed up to the UN, all these silly historic territorial claims would cease (and there are none more silly than Malvinistas)..and the people who live in every territory will self-determine their own future.

    By their very nature, every single one of the UK “colonies” remaining, (1/4 of the planet now self-determining peacefully) are indeed bound by this principle and living by it.

    So Paul stop behaving like an anal wart and grow up.

    Feb 09th, 2015 - 07:38 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    Just because CFK has a new friend in Chine,
    all of a sudden she thinks she is cat woman,
    Argentina can rule the world,

    total loonies to the end.

    Feb 09th, 2015 - 08:25 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • lsolde

    @56 pauli-niño,
    You said that, you had better think again.
    Then check what you wrote.
    You may not have meant it, but you said it, idiot boy.
    You've been misbehaving lately, niño.
    You need a good spanking.
    Miss out on your tea & be sent to your room.
    Now go away, pest & stop bothering the adults.

    Feb 09th, 2015 - 08:58 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • brianF.I

    Pauly is just angry because he lives in a tin house in a shanty town and pretends to be a surfer. Pauly mate, just so your aware, pulling a bit of wood of your shit hole hole house does not make it a surf board, but keep trying buddy, one day you can stop pretending and be an adult LOL

    Feb 09th, 2015 - 09:34 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    stop with the insults isolda
    what-a-shame.
    bet you are one of those girls that after a pair of vodkas starts to fight against the whole pub, throwing bottles and stuff.
    you wild girl.

    Feb 09th, 2015 - 10:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    you presume to insult a lady...

    Feb 09th, 2015 - 11:52 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    @60 Isolde

    I don't know what Paul's problem is. For all I know he isn't even Argentinean. He could be Peruvian for all I know.

    Feb 09th, 2015 - 11:58 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Falkland Islands

    paulcedron as I read your posts, to me you seem a very sad little individual probably no more than 5' 4” tall and full of rage because deep down you know the truth that the Falkland Islands are British and has been British for 250 years (Long before Argentina stole part of South America) and there is not a single thing you can do about it. :)

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 12:20 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    63-64-65
    cierren el culo, trío de boludos.
    no doubts all of you are underdeveloped, taking in account the lack of fresh food, drinkable water, proper hospitals, doctors, etc.

    and let me ask you something, bunch of greasy fatties, can anyone call this pile of rubbish a hotel?
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/20572533@N00/435546917/in/set-72157594197317682

    if that is a hotel for you, i can not imagine what a house is according to your criteria.

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 12:30 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Falkland Islands

    @ 66 ha ha very grumpy little squirt :)

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 12:37 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Islander1

    Paulecdron- well am still waiting for you to answer my points!
    But then you have revealed why you are so dumb and out of touch with reality - you say N.Ireland will return one day to its rightfull owner - the republic of Ireland!

    Well that really does show you and the other Argentines as good old 18th century Colonial Dictators!

    N.Ireland belongs to - The people of Northern Ireland - whatever their faith may be - same as the Republic of Ireland belongs to those who live there - hell even Argentina belongs to the people who live in Argentina!

    Good old fashioned Colonialist Paulecdron- to hell with people - its land- territory that matters - people and their wishes are irrelevant.

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 12:49 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    68
    you are not too bright, are you?
    territorial integrity is what really matters, you dumbasshole.

    the “people” you are talking about is implanted population, exactly like you, the llanitos, the israeli in palestina and the list goes on.

    they can decide if they want to be english, british or qhatever they want.
    but they cannot decide a shite about the land.

    bunch of squatters

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 02:24 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    69 Pablo comfortBoy

    “...territorial integrity is what really matters, you dumbasshole.”

    No way, Jose Pablo Cedron !!

    the K Peronist concept of “territorial integrity” is the most outmoded , and false argument that the Peronists have ever tried to perpetuate!

    The UN has stated that it exactly contradicts the 20th and 21st Century concepts and legal definitions of Sovereignty and Legal and Human Rights!!!

    You are SO dim !!

    How stupid are they in Chacarita??? LOL!!

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 03:13 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • ilsen

    Penguin_Cedron

    Massive Fail!!!

    Again!

    At least he is reliable one thing.

    paulie, you are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts.

    silly child.

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 04:30 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • DanyBerger

    @ paulcedron

    Isolde is not an English person you can deduce that by the way she/he writes I will give my 2 cents that she/he is a Latina or latino person.
    May be Chilean?

    May be the only English person here is Briton but I’m not sure yet, especially after his answer about the Euro tunnel. haha

    Now you can keep going with the insulting stuff. Haha

    Would you like some musik?
    Lita ford and Ozzy
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy3fJ8Nmzyw

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 05:02 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    Dany and José,

    How are the Boca Jrs. doing this year?

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 05:49 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • DanyBerger

    @Troy Tempest

    I don't know you tell me...

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 06:23 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Monkeymagic

    Paulcondom...retard

    If the people of Northern Ireland are “implanted” or indeed the people of Gibraltar or the Falklands....then absolutely sure as hell the people of Argentina are.

    Then of course the people of all LATIN America are implanted.

    And actually the people of ...oh shit...the whole world are implanted....except perhaps a small area of sub-Saharan Africa were the species first evolved.

    You can call yourself Argentine...but you can't say shite about the land...it belongs to the Amerindians.

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 07:48 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    69 paulcedron
    The term “territorial integrity” is modern term that comes directly from the UN Charter. It cannot be applied retroactive to its creation as there is a bar in international law from doing this. ”...The rule of the intertemporal law still insists that an act must be characterized in accordance with the law in force at the time it was done, or closely on the next occasion. ...
    The Acquisition of Territory in International Law By Robert Yewdall Jennings
    a Judge of the International Court of Justice from 1982. He also served as the President of the ICJ between 1991 and 1994.
    and
    Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
    Article 28 Non-retroactivity of treaties
    Unless a different intention appears from the treaty or is otherwise established, its provisions do not bind a party in relation to any act or fact which took place or any situation which ceased to exist before the date of the entry into force of the treaty with respect to that party.

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 08:30 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • lsolde

    @62 paulcedron,
    But you are just so insultable, niño.
    Who told you that l drink Vodka?
    You have only been on this site for about 1 year or so & l have not mentioned it to you in that time.
    Several years ago before you began posting l stated that l enjoyed a Vodka now & then, to sr Think.
    Think has all but disappeared & you now appear, pouf! just like that.
    Mmmmmmmmmmmmn!
    @72 DanyBerger,
    You are 50% right,(& of course 50% wrong!) Danybeachbum, l am half English by blood.
    And a British citizen.
    English was not my first language.
    You lose your 2 cents, Danybum.
    Not Chilean or Latino. And thats more than enough facts for you.

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 09:53 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    isolda
    ”Who told you that l drink Vodka?
    You.
    What happened?
    You forgot it?
    I blame the vodka

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 12:11 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    77 Isolde

    It would seem that Pablo ComfortBoy Cedron is the sock
    Puppet of a longer-term Troll, or he plays with the likes of “Dany” and they fantasize about you together, as adolescents often do...

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 04:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    79
    pelotudo

    nobody from argentina can fantasize with somebody from the islets, you knobhead.
    all of you are extremely fat and extremely ugly according to our strict criteria.

    not to mention that you are not too bright either,

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 04:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    Sure José, you say that, but here you are every day, trying to woo Isolde, or trying to impress the British LOL !!

    You'll be forced to entertain Chinese 'lovers' soon anyway.

    I don't know how much you'll like that. CFK says they talk funny - they sure are pissed about her stupid tweets!

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 04:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    paulcedron
    changing the subject and using alleviated words will not make you a gentleman, rather a stalker may well fit the bill,

    DanyBerger
    you obviously know what a peeler and a bow street runner has in common.

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 07:33 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    80 “ComfortBoy”

    “79
    pelotudo

    nobody from argentina can fantasize with somebody from the islets, you knobhead.
    all of you are extremely fat and extremely ugly according to our strict criteria.

    not to mention that you are not too bright either,”

    No matter what you say, PillowBoy, and no matter how much you secretly want it, you do NOT have our approval, and we are very unimpressed by you.

    Your government embarrasses your nation.

    YOU embarrass your people.

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 07:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    NASA
    did you know Britain had its very own rocket facilities and rocket launcher in the fifties and sixties,
    danny.

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 08:04 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    briton
    thanks god they quit the crazy idea of launching rockets.
    you know, britain + technology = accident waiting to happen.
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/14/nuclear-weapons-accident-waiting-to-happen

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 09:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • lsolde

    @78 paulcedron,
    Now you are making up stories, niño.
    Whats the matter? Don't you like fat women? Or ugly women?
    You have standards?
    l'd have thought that a loser like you would be grateful if ANY woman even noticed you.
    Haven't seen any fat, ugly women lately.
    But then, l haven't been to Argentina. lol!

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 09:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Clyde15

    #85
    As an argentinian do you know what technology is ? Thank God you don't have access to any ! A surf board is Hi Tec to you ! I would not even trust a wheelbarrow made in Argentina.
    As far as I remember there were no accidents of any consequence in the period decades ago when we had IRBM's,
    Nuclear weapons are a risk as can be seen from accidents both here , the USA and more so in the defunct Soviet Union. I have lived within 50 miles of the bases at Faslane, and the Holy Loch when the USN subs were there. I have a nuclear power station 25 miles away but the only “danger” came when the Chernobyl reactor blew up and we had radioactive Strontium dumped on us from atmospheric drift. Argentina and nuclear power...at least you are at the arse -end of nowhere and damage could be contained in your happy land, although Chile might be apprehensive.

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 11:11 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • paulcedron

    don't be so hypersensitive isolda.
    you want to be considered a beautiful girl?
    ok, you are the exception of the rule there then.
    you and elaine.
    happy now?

    now i am very disappointed that you have pretended to be an english / british girl all this time, and you turned out to be a chilota.

    what a shame...

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 11:30 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    85 Pablo PillowBoy

    Ahh, the old Guardian piece about the sub??

    Are you trying to 're-float' that old non-story ??
    We dispensed with that quite easily, months ago, when you first appeared on MP with your indignation and out-dated jibes.
    Bit of a 'red-herring' really, isn't it?

    You seem very keen to impress us and have our respect, otherwise You wouldn't be telling us how wonderful you are.... day after day.

    Is it true that the Argies just entered the 'Space Age'?

    Oh, wait, no, that was 60 years ago.

    You are so third world, now.

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 11:36 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • DanyBerger

    @lsolde

    “You are 50% right,(& of course 50% wrong!) Danybeachbum, l am half English by blood.
    And a British citizen.
    English was not my first language.
    You lose your 2 cents, Danybum.
    Not Chilean or Latino. And thats more than enough facts for you.”

    And what probes? Since when an English person cannot be a Latina or Latino?

    You could be the son or daughter of Giussepe Cucuruli (from Sicily), Pierre Gobeti (from France), Manuel Cardozo (from Spain) who got an English citizenship and in fact half of the English were mixed with the little Italians that invaded the Islands in the past.

    Or where do you think English come from?

    And by the way the other half where it come from?

    @Briton

    Peeler? Are you talking about a policemen?

    English use Bobby more often and BlueBo’le. Bobby was the nickname of Robert Peel, can you see? Peel= Peeler.

    Di ya see aaany BlueBo’le sho’i brada?

    Good try, btw are you Australian or just you got kept into the freezer for so long?

    Bow street, is where the Royal Opera House is in Covent Garden.

    But as you are talking about police I assume you are talking about another way to call a police that none seem to use anymore.

    Update your language mate because your clock is out of time...

    Ha ha I can image you asking to the Paki of the corner shop...

    Can you see any “Bow Street Runner” around here mate I was rob?

    WTF? I don’t sell drugs go away

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 11:40 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Simon68

    87 Clyde15

    Actually Chile would probably be safe as the predominant winds are are westerlies in Western Argentina and South Easterlies in Province of Buenos Aires. The neighbouring countries that might suffer from a melt down could possibly be Uruguay and Paraguay and maybe Bolivia.

    Feb 10th, 2015 - 11:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    Danny danny, wrong again,
    still you do try.

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 12:01 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    92 Briton

    Very obviously, English is NOT Dany's first language.

    Took him a while to google up that info for you.

    I think he and NOSTRILS could both do with checking the Urban Dictionary once in a while.
    They are both a little 'unhip' .

    'Bummer', huh, Dany ??

    Sucks to be you!

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 12:27 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • DanyBerger

    @Briton

    Peeler is slang for police as is Bobby at least you’re thinking in potatoes.

    I guess you know who was R. Peel, do you?

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 02:48 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Hepatia

    I think that the asymmetry of this situation is illustrated by the fact that in response to vague reports of Argentina negotiating with various parties the UK is forced not only to issue these denials but also spend $1B on improved defense.

    In any case the UK will be returning the Malvinas within the next 25 years.

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 03:28 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    95 Hepatia

    ...and yet, the UK Air Commodore is saying exactly the opposite to you, a mealy mouthed dysfunctional Internet troll.

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 03:36 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Hepatia

    http://en.mercopress.com/2015/02/06/british-top-commander-rubbishes-any-falklands-high-alert-stories#comment380015: Yes. The “Air Commodore” has been forced to issue a denial of a troop build up and the UK has been forced to spent $1B on island defense as a result of apparent Argentinian negotiations. So, you point is what?

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 03:58 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    97 Hepstia

    You are flat out lying !

    $1b ??? Where was that mentioned?

    Not the MP article, nor the Express article.

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/555469/Hundreds-of-British-troops-are-sent-to-the-Falklands-for-a-security-boost

    Troop strength has been 1,200 for years, when the recommended minimum is 2,000.

    “Exercises” will be held in the Islands - 150-300 troops will “rotate through” for training.

    When the new Carrier is deployed, the 'high readiness' will no longer be required.

    ARGENTINA- Pay your debts!!!

    JUSTICE FOR NISMAN !!!

    JUSTICE FOR THE AMIA VICTIMS!!

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 06:24 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • lsolde

    @95 Hepatia,
    Change the record, Hepatia.
    The needle is stuck at “in 25 years”, “in 25 years”, “in 25 years”, “in 25 years”.
    Stupid Troll.
    @90 DanyBerger,
    l could be a lot of the things that you mention.
    But l am just me.
    And you are still a mis-informed malvinista.
    Or maybe just another baiting Troll.

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 09:43 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • DanyBerger

    @lsolde

    malvinista????
    WTF is a malvinista?

    Well if that means I don't like Britons liars may you are right.

    Anyway clarification please because I like precision and not just guessings if you know wat I mean...

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 10:00 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • lsolde

    @ 100DanyBerger,
    So you accept that you are mis-informed.
    But don't know what you actually are.?
    Well sorry Dany, if you're too thick to see, then l cannot help you.
    Because you ARE a malvinista.
    Hope this helps.

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 10:20 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Clyde15

    #95
    In any case the UK will be returning the Malvinas within the next 25 years.
    As we have no “Malvinas” this will be impossible......nearly said bananas, just as likely.
    In any case I predict that Argentina will implode within 25 years and revert into warring states while Brazil and Chile will take over any bits of the territory they think fit. Watch this space.

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 10:45 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    Robert peel, as apposed to orange .lol

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 10:55 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • SebaSvtz

    Argentina should be a Brit Overseas Territory for the next 100 years. After that, we will see if we have reached maturity to run our own country by ourselves. That´s the only way I see to stop this depressing downfall.

    I don´t want to be a Venezuelan colony.
    I don´t want to be a Chinese colony.
    I don´t want to be a hostage from the peronist party anymore.

    Bunch of lazy Brits, you failed in 1806 and 1807, couldn´t you try again in 1808? just imagine how awesome and different things could have being ...
    :`(

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 11:11 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Usurping Pirate

    @97 Hepatia : The Daily Express is the UK equivalent of Cronica .
    They normally print conspiracy theories about the death of Diana , 20 years after the event , in the same that Cronica does about the death of Evita . Choosing to quote it makes you look very silly .
    There , you can tell your Campola fliends you have learnt something new about the “ enemy ” .....

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 11:21 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    Bunch of lazy Brits, you failed in 1806 and 1807, couldn´t you try again in 1808
    can you provide details and proof please that it was 100% british.

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 11:45 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    @95,97 Hippy
    Before you keep clutterng this forum with useless posts, why don't you answer the qustions I challenged you to......you make senseless remarks, with no foundation, and leave it at that...is that how you brain works ? never finishing anything you start ?? Show us that you aren't as stupid as you sound.

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 03:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    Apparently Britain new Antarctic military base is proceeding on time and within budget,

    Eye wonder if the MOD will put all the subs down there or just the nuclear ones ??

    Feb 11th, 2015 - 06:14 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jo Bloggs

    95 Hep

    25 years huh?
    Is that 25 years from today when you said it?
    Or 25 years from when Timmerman said it last year?
    Or 25 years from when Crisis Fernandez de Kirchner said it in 2013?
    Or 25 years from when Ambassador Aguello said it in 2012?
    Or 25 years from when Crisis Fernandez de Keirchner said it in 2011?
    etc
    etc
    etc
    etc
    etc
    to, my first recollection;
    When Videla said it in about 79?

    Chuckle chuckle.

    Feb 12th, 2015 - 12:18 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Tarquin Fin

    At this rate of delusion and arrogance put forth by an important number of fellow country-men that call themselves patriotic, in 25 years, a big Argentina shaped crater will be the most remarkable feature in the South American continent.

    Feb 12th, 2015 - 12:46 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Usurping Pirate

    In 25 years the new Algetinians wirr be craiming the Isras Marvinas.
    And this according to Kletina's fliend Hepatia .....

    Feb 12th, 2015 - 06:44 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Tarquin Fin

    Say what?

    Feb 13th, 2015 - 03:50 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • lsolde

    @112 Tarquin Fin,
    Spoken by your new Chinese rulers.
    Usurping Pirate is mimicking them.

    Feb 13th, 2015 - 09:11 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Tarquin Fin

    @111, 113 I see it now. wirr be craiming? ... haha ... that threw me off.

    Feb 13th, 2015 - 12:25 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pete Bog

    @109
    “25 years huh?”

    It's a new INDEC perpetual 25 years.

    According to Mystic Hepatia the first prediction was about 3 (?) years ago, but the crystal ball must be cracked as surely you should be getting ready to flee in 22 years time?

    If Argentina were ever to design, build and prepare to launch a serious space rocket, the countdown would be 25(down to 2) and never reach 1 or 0 as it would continuously reset to 25 forever, if Hepatia was the head of Argentine mission control.

    Feb 15th, 2015 - 08:37 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • lsolde

    @115 Pete Bog,
    Quite a while ago, Hepatia claimed that SHE was an American.
    l tend to doubt it as she didn't sound like any American that l've ever met & she only had a hazy idea of local thoughts, mores or customs.
    Maybe a recently arrived Argentine living in the USA.
    Who knows?
    Who really cares?

    Feb 15th, 2015 - 09:42 pm - Link - Report abuse 0

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!