MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, November 5th 2024 - 03:47 UTC

 

 

Two British bankers convicted in the US for manipulation of the Libor rate

Friday, November 6th 2015 - 08:57 UTC
Full article 2 comments
The Libor scandal blew up in 2012 when it emerged that banks had been lying in the figures on which Libor was set. The Libor scandal blew up in 2012 when it emerged that banks had been lying in the figures on which Libor was set.
The US Department of Justice reached a deal with Rabobank in October 2013 for $1bn over its role in manipulating Libor. The US Department of Justice reached a deal with Rabobank in October 2013 for $1bn over its role in manipulating Libor.
The case of Allen and Conit was the first conviction of traders involved in the scandal in the US. The case of Allen and Conit was the first conviction of traders involved in the scandal in the US.

Two British bankers have been convicted by a New York jury of manipulating inter-bank lending rates. Anthony Allen and Anthony Conti were charged with conspiracy to commit wire and bank fraud and committing wire fraud, by misreporting the London interbank offered rate (Libor) as it related to the US dollar. Both worked for Dutch lender Rabobank.

 The Libor scandal blew up in 2012 when it emerged that banks had been lying in the figures on which Libor was set. The Libor rate is a key figure in setting global borrowing rates.

The US Department of Justice reached a deal with Rabobank in October 2013 for $1bn over its role in manipulating Libor.

This was the first conviction of traders involved in the scandal in the US.

In August, Tom Hayes, a former Tokyo-based trader at UBS and Citigroup was convicted of Libor-manipulation in London.

In a statement, Leslie Caldwell, head of the Justice Department's criminal division, said, “Today's verdicts illustrate the department's successful efforts to hold accountable bank executives responsible for this global fraud scheme.”

Allen and Conti, along with other traders around the world, lied about how much it cost them to borrow from other banks.

During the trial their attorneys argued that what they had done should not be considered fraud because the panel collecting the data knew that many bankers lied about the rate.

Categories: Economy, Politics, International.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Clyde15

    I hope they get banged up for 50 years !

    Nov 06th, 2015 - 10:49 am 0
  • Briton

    Put them into an isolated cell,
    give them the money [ fake] that they stole,
    and tell them to enjoy the next 30 years counting it...lol

    Nov 06th, 2015 - 02:00 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!