MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, November 22nd 2024 - 02:56 UTC

 

 

G20 trade ministers Shanghai meeting question China's industries overcapacity

Wednesday, July 13th 2016 - 06:58 UTC
Full article 1 comment
 “We agree that we need to do more to achieve our common objectives for global growth, stability and prosperity.” said China’s Commerce Minister Gao Hucheng “We agree that we need to do more to achieve our common objectives for global growth, stability and prosperity.” said China’s Commerce Minister Gao Hucheng
The specter of protectionism has loomed large over global trade amid sluggish economic growth and is a pressing concern for China. The specter of protectionism has loomed large over global trade amid sluggish economic growth and is a pressing concern for China.
China's huge struggling steel sector has relied on exports to offset slowing domestic demand, but it has been accused of using unfair pricing to push foreign competitors China's huge struggling steel sector has relied on exports to offset slowing domestic demand, but it has been accused of using unfair pricing to push foreign competitors
US Trade Representative Michael Froman said that G20 had “added to the chorus of voices calling for tackling the root causes of excess capacity.” US Trade Representative Michael Froman said that G20 had “added to the chorus of voices calling for tackling the root causes of excess capacity.”

In the face of a “worrying” rise in protectionism, trade ministers from the world’s major economies have agreed to cut trade costs, increase policy coordination and enhance financing, China’s Commerce Minister Gao Hucheng announced at the closing of the Group of 20, G20, meeting in Shanghai.

 “The global recovery continues, but it remains uneven and falls short of our ambition for strong, sustainable and balanced growth. Downside risks and vulnerabilities persist,” the ministers said in a joint statement.

“We agree that we need to do more to achieve our common objectives for global growth, stability and prosperity.”

The specter of protectionism has loomed large over global trade amid sluggish economic growth and is a pressing concern for China.

The country’s huge but struggling steel sector has relied on exports to offset the impact of slowing domestic demand, but it has been accused of using unfair pricing to push foreign competitors out of business.

The ministers discussed the need to address overcapacity, particularly in the steel sector, but some disagreed about the need for specific new commitments to resolve the problem, said one senior trade official involved in the talks, declining to be identified because details of the discussions had not been made public.

The joint statement reflected China’s concerns that the country was being singled out for blame for a glut that has led to a collapse in global prices, noting instead that excess capacity in steel and other industries is “a global issue which requires collective responses,” and that subsidies and government support could cause distortions.

The United States has been a vocal critic of China’s excess capacity, saying its pledges have not gone far enough to resolve the problem.

US Trade Representative Michael Froman said in a statement that the G20 had “added to the chorus of voices calling for tackling the root causes of excess capacity for the benefit of both developing and developed countries.”

Chinese trade officials have repeatedly stressed that the country has been the victim of overzealous anti-dumping actions by foreign countries, which fail to take into account Chinese efficiency or its low labor and production costs.

The trade growth strategy adopted by the ministers spelled out broad principles for stimulating trade, including lowering costs, boosting trade finance and stimulating the service sector.

The investment policymaking guiding principles urged governments to avoid protectionism in relation to cross-border investment and establish “non-discriminatory, transparent and predictable” conditions for investment.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • chronic

    “address overcapacity”

    Have that discussion in the USA and you're conspiring to restrain trade - a felony.

    Jul 17th, 2016 - 10:43 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!