Portugal’s former Prime Minister Antonio Guterres has unofficially been selected as the next U.N. Secretary-General. He is expected to be officially endorsed in the coming days. Following a decisive round of voting Wednesday in the U.N. Security Council, the veteran politician and diplomat prevailed with 13 votes in favor of his candidacy, none objecting to it and two votes of “no opinion”.
“Today we have a clear favorite and his name is Antonio Gutteres,” Russia’s U.N. ambassador Vitaly Churkin announced in his capacity as council president. In an unexpected move, he was flanked at the microphone by all of the council’s ambassadors.
“We’ve decided to go for a formal vote tomorrow at 10:00 am. We hope it can be done by acclamation,” Churkin added.
Wednesday’s round of informal straw polls was significant because for the first time, the five permanent, veto-wielding council members used color-coded ballots that signified vetoes of candidates. Guterres escaped the vetoes and received more than the minimum 9 votes needed to prevail.
On Thursday, the council will formalize its decision in a vote and after that put the decision in a resolution. The council will then sends its recommendation to the U.N. General Assembly which is expected to rubber stamp the Guterres selection.
Guterres, 67, was Portugal’s prime minister from 1992 to 2002. He led the U.N. Refugee Agency for a decade from 2005-2015.
In an interview during his campaign Guterres said that he was running for the top U.N. job because he wants to “create the conditions for solutions” to global challenges.
There will be no end of challenges awaiting him when he takes over from Ban Ki-moon on January 1, 2017.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesSo which of the UN Security Council voting members do you suppose provided the vetoes of Malacara?
Oct 05th, 2016 - 10:26 pm 0She did even worse than Helen Clark on the encourage votes.
Sigh. All that lameculeando that Malacara did was for naught.
And making public statements showing her disapproval of fundamental democratic processes could not have helped.
You cant have a Secretary General of the UN who does not believe in Self-determination. The thought of having yet another Argentine woman ranting on about that Malvinas thing day in day out, I guess put a lot of people off in the end.
Oct 06th, 2016 - 06:58 am 0She was still coming to terms with the usurpation and all those UN resolutions.
Oct 06th, 2016 - 09:38 am 0It was hard to get her head around the facts: https://www.academia.edu/21721198/Falklands_1833_Usurpation_and_UN_Resolutions
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!