MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, December 22nd 2024 - 11:45 UTC

 

 

Government cannot trigger Article 50 without an act of Parliament, rules the Supreme Court

Wednesday, January 25th 2017 - 08:09 UTC
Full article 5 comments
Lord Neuberger said: “By a majority of eight to three, the Supreme Court today rules that the government cannot trigger Article 50 without an act of Parliament” Lord Neuberger said: “By a majority of eight to three, the Supreme Court today rules that the government cannot trigger Article 50 without an act of Parliament”

The UK Parliament must vote on whether the government can start the Brexit process, the Supreme Court has ruled. The judgment means Prime Minister Theresa May cannot begin talks with the EU until MPs and peers give their backing - although this is expected to happen in time for the government's 31 March deadline.

 But the court ruled the Scottish Parliament and Welsh and Northern Ireland assemblies did not need a say. Brexit Secretary David Davis promised a parliamentary bill “within days”.

During the Supreme Court hearing, campaigners argued that denying the UK Parliament a vote was undemocratic and a breach of long-standing constitutional principles.

They said triggering Article 50 would mean overturning existing UK law, so MPs and peers should decide. But the government argued that, under the Royal Prerogative (powers handed to ministers by the Crown), it could make this move without the need to consult Parliament. And it said that MPs had voted overwhelmingly to put the issue in the hands of the British people when they backed the calling of last June's referendum in which UK voters backed Brexit by 51.9% to 48.1%.

Reading out the judgment, Supreme Court President Lord Neuberger said: “By a majority of eight to three, the Supreme Court today rules that the government cannot trigger Article 50 without an act of Parliament authorizing it to do so.”

He added: “Withdrawal effects a fundamental change by cutting off the source of EU law, as well as changing legal rights. The UK's constitutional arrangements require such changes to be clearly authorized by Parliament.”

The court also rejected, unanimously, arguments that the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly and Northern Ireland Assembly should get to vote on Article 50 before it is triggered. Lord Neuberger said: “Relations with the EU are a matter for the UK government.”

Outlining plans to bring in a “straightforward” parliamentary bill on Article 50, Mr Davis told MPs he was “determined” Brexit would go ahead as voted for in last June's EU membership referendum.

He added: “It's not about whether the UK should leave the European Union. That decision has already been made by people in the United Kingdom.”

“There can be no turning back,” he said. “The point of no return was passed on 23 June last year.”

Outside the Supreme Court, Attorney General Jeremy Wright said the government was “disappointed” but would “comply” and do “all that is necessary” to implement the court's judgment.

A Downing Street spokesman said: “The British people voted to leave the EU, and the government will deliver on their verdict - triggering Article 50, as planned, by the end of March. Today's ruling does nothing to change that.”

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, a leading Leave campaigner, tweeted: “Supreme Court has spoken. Now Parliament must deliver will of the people - we will trigger A50 by end of March. Forward we go!”

Categories: Politics, International.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • LEPRecon

    ElaineB

    Its actually the remain voters who are upset and are seeking to circumvent democracy and the will of the people.

    In fact the UK was taken illegally in to the EU in the 1st place...

    http://www.vernoncoleman.com/euillegally.html

    There were definitely some dodgy dealing going on.

    As for this going before parliament, the MPs had better try NOT to give the UK Brexit but with so many strings attached that we might as well have stayed in...which is what many 'pro-European' MPs (from all parties) want to do.

    Should they try such a thing then the PM should immediately call a General Election and many of those MPs would end up on the dole...because they are not elected to Parliament to serve their own selfish interests...but to serve the will of the majority.

    That's how democracy works.

    And if the PM doesn't call for a new election, then HMQ can dissolve Parliament and make the MPs answerable to the people.

    Jan 25th, 2017 - 05:17 pm +2
  • Briton

    Davis has stated that nothing will now stop it,
    delay is all that has happened,
    but withdraw we will.

    Jan 25th, 2017 - 08:41 pm +2
  • ElaineB

    Good. So the legality has been settled now rather than at the eleventh hour. I can't imagine why the paranoid Leave voter are so upset. We are leaving the E.U. and there is no need to panic.

    Jan 25th, 2017 - 12:03 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!