MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, November 15th 2024 - 00:52 UTC

 

 

“Continued free flow of personal data”, another challenge for Brexit

Friday, August 25th 2017 - 14:24 UTC
Full article 2 comments
“We want the secure flow of data to be unhindered in the future as we leave the EU,” said Matt Hancock, Minister for Digital, on the publication of the paper. “We want the secure flow of data to be unhindered in the future as we leave the EU,” said Matt Hancock, Minister for Digital, on the publication of the paper.

The UK will seek “new arrangements” with the EU in order to allow for the continued free flow of personal data, according to a government paper. Many UK businesses and law enforcement agencies rely on EU data.

 It argues the UK starts from “unprecedented” alignment with EU law, but acknowledges collaboration will be needed to protect British interests. One legal expert said the paper was a “step forward” but overlooked some key points.

The paper puts forward the UK government's position that a UK-EU model for exchanging and protecting data will be essential to maintain a “deep and special partnership”, a phrase used four times in the document.

Regarding how to achieve this, the government suggests that the Information Commissioner be “fully involved” in future EU regulatory discussions.

It also raises the possibility of the UK and EU mutually recognizing each other's data protection rules as the basis for allowing the free flow of data to continue. And there should be an agreed timeline for implementing more long-term arrangements to reassure businesses, the government adds.

“It will help businesses who need to be able to plan their future - they need a sense of what the law will be,” said Dr Karen Mc Cullagh, a legal expert at the University of East Anglia.

However, the UK's approach to surveillance might give EU negotiators cause for concern when considering business-as-usual, she added.

“[The paper overlooks] some important facts - the most important one being the Investigatory Powers Act which is likely to present a hurdle.”

On the idea that the Information Commissioner should still have access to EU regulatory dialogue, Dr Mc Cullagh said: “There will be a concern that [UK lawmakers] will lose the ability to influence if they're not at the table, if they can't shape future laws.”

Earlier this month, the UK government said that it would implement the EU's overarching General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) within British law.

These regulations allow for bigger fines on firms that flout the rules - and it will also be easier for consumers to control information about them online and in databases controlled by companies.

“We want the secure flow of data to be unhindered in the future as we leave the EU,” said Matt Hancock, Minister for Digital, on the publication of the paper.

“So a strong future data relationship between the UK and EU, based on aligned data protection rules, is in our mutual interest.”

Many UK businesses, law enforcement agencies and research institutions rely on quick and easy access to EU data in order to do their work.

In fact, the UK has the largest internet economy as a percentage of GDP out of all the G20 countries, according to the Boston Consulting Group and much of that relies on data flowing freely.

A House of Lords report recently found that if data transfers were hindered, “the UK could be put at a competitive disadvantage and the police could lose access to information and intelligence mechanisms”.

Categories: Economy, Politics, International.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Tr0lListic_Approach

    Pathetic!

    This is what the world is coming to... Data, corporations, and money have more rights than actual human beings.

    This is an issue well beyond Brexit. Across all the nations of world right now the laws are such that it is easier for cash, an enterprise, and for personal information to have more freedom of movement than the actual people that own the cash, make the corporation, and have the right to their personal info.

    That is why you see what you are seeing, instability and people fed up to have fewer rights than a cheque, or an inc. limited entity.

    Aug 25th, 2017 - 05:50 pm 0
  • DemonTree

    You have the wrong end of the stick. The EU has really strict data protection laws which I can tell you about in long and boring detail if you want. And because of this it is illegal to send people's data to other countries that do not have comparably strict laws. Canada and Argentina are allowed, the US is emphatically not. Therefore the UK needs to stick very close to the EU laws in the future or it will hobble businesses here.

    Aug 27th, 2017 - 11:51 am 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!