MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, December 23rd 2024 - 00:19 UTC

 

 

EU tells UK it must take withdrawal talks “seriously” and end “ambiguity”

Tuesday, August 29th 2017 - 07:43 UTC
Full article 19 comments
 Brexit Secretary David Davis (L) ”And the sooner we remove the ambiguity, the sooner we will be in a position to discuss the future relationship and a transitional period” Barnier said.(Pic AFP)
Brexit Secretary David Davis (L) ”And the sooner we remove the ambiguity, the sooner we will be in a position to discuss the future relationship and a transitional period” Barnier said.(Pic AFP)

The UK has been told by the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator that it needs to take withdrawal talks “seriously”. Michel Barnier used the opening of a third round of talks in Brussels on Monday to insist that London must end “ambiguity” regarding key positions like the Brexit divorce bill.

 He said: “To be honest, I’m concerned, time passes quickly. We need UK positions on all separation issues. This is necessary to make sufficient progress. We must start negotiating seriously.”

“We need UK papers that are clear in order to have constructive negotiations. And the sooner we remove the ambiguity, the sooner we will be in a position to discuss the future relationship and a transitional period.”

“I am ready to intensify negotiations over the coming weeks in order to advance.”

In response, Brexit Secretary David Davis said Britain was ready to “roll up its sleeves” to get a deal. Mr. Davis insisted the British position papers were sufficiently detailed, stating: “They are the products of hard work and detailed thinking that has been going on behind the scenes not just the last few weeks, but for the last 12 months, and should form the basis of what I hope will be a constructive week of talks.”

He added: “For the United Kingdom the week ahead is about driving forward the technical discussions across all the issues. We want to lock in the points where we agree, unpick the areas where we disagree, and make further progress on the whole range of issues.”

He said this will “require flexibility and imagination from both sides”, adding: “And we are ready to roll up our sleeves and get down to work again once more.”

Ahead of the talks, Davis was believed to be frustrated at Barnier’s insistence that progress must be made on fixing the UK’s “divorce” bill before moving on to talks on future trade. He believes the series of papers produced by his Department for Exiting the EU over the past fortnight have proved that the two issues are inextricably linked.

However, Brussels is understood to be infuriated at Britain’s refusal even to spell out how it thinks its liabilities to the EU should be calculated, let alone put a figure on the final bill, variously estimated at between £50 billion and £80 billion.

The latest round of withdrawal talks began in the wake of Labor’s move to promise to keep the UK in the single market and customs union after March 2019.

Under the new policy unveiled by shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer, the UK would continue to observe EU rules on migration and trade during a transition period expected to last up to four years, in order to avoid a “cliff-edge” shock to business.

The move was welcomed by trade unions and opponents of a hard Brexit, but sparked fury among Labor supporters of EU withdrawal, who warned it could cost the party votes in the Midlands and North.

Ahead of the Brussels talks, Mr. Barnier used a French newspaper article to state Brexit would have an impact on defense and security matters. Writing in Le Monde, he said: “It will have very practical consequences, including on defense and security.”

“The British Minister of Defense will no longer be able to sit on the Council of Defense Ministers; London will leave the European Defence Agency and Europol; British defense research centers and the defense industry will not be eligible for the European Defense Fund; London will not be able to assume the command of European operations.”

“Nevertheless, the union of 27 and the United Kingdom will have to join forces to deal with common threats: the safety of our fellow citizens is not being marketed, and therefore we will examine in due course the conditions for convergence between the union of 27 and the United Kingdom on security and defense matters.”

Categories: Economy, Politics, International.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Clyde15

    NA

    You are telling us that the EU gives us massive subsidies when we are one of the largest net payers into the EU budget, so much so that the Germans are worried that THEY will have to make up the difference when we say bye-bye.
    There will be cut-backs in the EU budget with less money to go around, so the recipients of budget hand-outs (paid for in part by the UK) will be disgruntled and maybe cause trouble as each vies for a larger share of a diminished pot.

    Seven countries are waiting in the wings to join the EU. Each one would be a net claimant on the budget. Either more contributions to the black hole budget or no money available.

    Are you saying that the UK gets more funding from the EU than our contributions ?

    You say:-
    As for the money the UK pays out to 27 other EU nations, coming from one nation that loss will barely be felt by them and will likely be made up for by funding from the EU.
    That does not make sense.
    The loss of UK contributions will not be felt by the EU. The loss will be made up by the EU.

    Explain that. Do they have a magic money tree OR will they have to up the contributions from the richer members...mainly Germany and France.

    You seem to be angry and hostile to Brexit. Why? If you are American which you appear to be then it doesn't concern you or even affect you in any great way.

    If you live in the EU, then I would think that you would be glad to get rid of us.

    The other possibility is that you are just a Troll coming into the discussion under a new name.

    Which is it ?

    Aug 29th, 2017 - 07:37 pm +2
  • Clyde15

    As to defence, I thought that this is covered by NATO. If we are removed from collaboration councils with Europe outside NATO, I would suggest that they have more to lose than us.

    The UK being outside any European “force” would mean the other large members such as Germany, France, Italy and Spain would have to up their game to cover the shortfall in resources and expertise. This would cause them to increase expenditure.....not a popular move for their electorate.

    Aug 29th, 2017 - 08:39 am +1
  • The Voice

    Theres no ambiguity, we are leaving... All that money of our ours paid to French farmers, on Spanish roads, Club Med vanity projects, dual parliament buildings, fat Euro cat salarys and pensions. We should pay nothing at all, they owe us. Walk away....

    Aug 29th, 2017 - 01:06 pm +1
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!