MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, March 31st 2023 - 08:55 UTC



Wales demanding UK government replace the promised EU after Brexit funds

Friday, October 2nd 2020 - 09:00 UTC
Full article
Parliament's Welsh Affairs Committee said the absence of detailed plans to replace £375m a year in European funding showed a “lack of priority”. Parliament's Welsh Affairs Committee said the absence of detailed plans to replace £375m a year in European funding showed a “lack of priority”.

“Negligible” progress has been made by the UK government to replace EU funds in Wales after Brexit, according to a committee of cross-party MPs. Former Welsh Secretary and senior Conservative MP Stephen Crabb said the situation was “simply unacceptable.”

Parliament's Welsh Affairs Committee said the absence of detailed plans to replace £375m a year in European funding showed a “lack of priority”.

Currently, Wales and other nations in the European Union receive EU Structural Funds to support economic development - such as infrastructure, businesses and skills - with poorer regions receiving greater investment.

With higher levels of economic deprivation, Wales received five times more funding per person than England between 2014 and 2020

This funding is coming to an end as the UK has now left the EU and the Brexit transition period finishes on 31 December.

In 2017, UK government ministers pledged to introduce measures to replace the EU cash, known as the Shared Prosperity Fund

But a new report published by the Welsh Affairs Committee warns, with just three months to go until the end of the transition period, “there is still no substantive detail from UK ministers about their plans and a range of issues remain unsolved”.

Conservative, Labour and Plaid Cymru MPs have called for “urgent reassurance” on the new fund to avoid a “cliff-edge to EU funds from January 2021”.

They also want a “firm date” for when substantive information about the fund will be made available - including what it will look like, how it will be funded and who will control it.

The committee has set out their key priorities for the fund, including asking for the money to be “needs-based” and “at least the current size of funding in real terms”.

MPs also recommended the fund should be administered in co-operation and as a partnership between the UK government, the parliaments in Scotland and Wales, the Northern Ireland Executive, and local authorities.

The Committee also said it wanted the funding to be made over an extended period of years to allow “effective planning and delivery”.

Committee chairman, Preseli Pembrokeshire MP Mr Crabb, said “we found that the government hasn't made anything like sufficient progress in terms of developing clear policy for replacing European funding at the end of this Brexit transition in less than three months' time - and that's unacceptable.”

He added that the committee felt “very, very strongly the UK government now needs to up its game”.

“For the last 20 years, Wales has qualified for European funding because it's one of the poorest parts of the EU.

”Many organizations in Wales have been relying on EU funds in recent years for training programs, skills programs, they could find themselves at the end of the year without any funding at all if the government doesn't do what it said it was going to do and bring forward a replacement fund and be clear about how it is going to be run, and how it's going to be administered.“

Aberavon Labour MP Stephen Kinnock, who chairs the all-party Parliamentary group on post-Brexit funding, stressed the importance of respecting the devolved nations.

”Our big worry is that as we take the program and the money out of Brussels and it is channeled through Westminster. At some point along the way the Westminster government will start to get its hands on it, and start using it for purposes that it's not really supposed to be used for,“ he said.

”We're saying there should not be a penny less than what we were getting under the European Union system, and there should not be a power lost either. We must ensure that the devolution settlement is respected throughout.”

Categories: Economy, Politics, International.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!