Britain reduced its foreign aid spending commitment on Wednesday to 0.5% of gross domestic product from 0.7%, causing junior minister Baroness Liz Sugg to resign and an immediate outcry from development organizations and the spiritual head of the Church of England.
The move, announced by finance minister Rishi Sunak as part of an annual review of government spending, will be popular among some voters and media who argue that COVID and the resulting economic crisis mean Britain should spend less on aid.
“During a domestic fiscal emergency, when we need to prioritize our limited resources on jobs and public services, sticking rigidly to spending 0.7% of our national income on overseas aid is difficult to justify,” Sunak said in a speech to parliament, pointing to record high peacetime borrowing levels.
He said aid spending would rise to 0.7% again when fiscal conditions allowed, but did not set a target date.
The government minister for sustainable development and Overseas Territories, Baroness Sugg, resigned over the decision, saying it was fundamentally wrong to cut aid spending and diminished Britain’s global influence.
A person close to her said that while Raab was not blindsided by the announcement, it was Johnson and Sunak who made a final decision and on the basis of politics, not economics. Foreign aid totaled 15.2 billion pounds last year.
Several senior members of the ruling Conservative Party, including former foreign minister Jeremy Hunt, also criticized the decision, hinting at a possible rebellion in parliament.
“To cut our aid budget by a third in a year when millions more will fall into extreme poverty will make not just them poorer, but us poorer in the eyes of the world,” Hunt said.
The announcement was also criticized by Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, the head of the Anglican Communion, who called it shameful and wrong.
Development and environment charities said the move was short-sighted.
“Cutting the aid budget during a global pandemic is like closing fire stations during a heat wave,” said Patrick Watt of Christian Aid.
Oxfam said the decision would diminish British influence and leadership at a time when both were badly needed
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesCurbing population growth is vital for welfare in Africa which consumes the lion's share of aid as its population doubles to 2.4 billion amid abundant resources in 1.2 billion acres. Kleptocracy, piracy, misogyny, banditry, conflict and disease drive migrants to Europe, burdening services as wealth evaporates, health disintegrates and taxpayers lose livelihoods. Diaspora include millionaire celebrities who should repatriate to domiciles of origin instead of demanding Diversity, Inclusion and Equality (DIE). Europeans DIE from the resulting Adversity and Invasion but Quality trumps Equality.
Nov 28th, 2020 - 07:04 am +3G U I L O T E G Ü E Ó N
Nov 29th, 2020 - 05:51 pm +1Güeón — please pay attention as this could change your life. Knowing your very SPECIAL Argentine character — I again would greatly recommend the knowledgable and quote filled TERENCE HILL as a very suitable partner who has an exciting and dynamic entertaining lifestyle: https://youtu.be/TE9PscWM_QE
Although he's an unemployed VIRGIN living in his mother's BASEMENT, you can't deny he'd make a marvelous significant partner that could educate you in PERVERSE Latin quotations and he has an incredible appreciation of inflatable sex toys. He has access to an amazing 300+ TV channels and a microwave in his charming mother's kitchen.
And if you are into the same dirty toilet paper fetish — you'll experience orgasim!
I think you Güeón and TERENCE would indeed be a marvelous matched pair!
Save TERENCE's sex dolls “LULA” and “LONG DONG SILVER” from their solitary misery!
Guilote Güeón — Terence is absolutely your perfect match!
¡Saludos de Chile!
Sans Culotte
Nov 30th, 2020 - 12:02 am +1And exactly what does your link have to do with the price of cheese?
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!