MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, January 18th 2021 - 01:45 UTC

 

 

FA admits Cavani is not racist, and blames Manchester United for not offering the player social media training

Friday, January 8th 2021 - 01:33 UTC
Full article 3 comments
The full findings of the FA regulatory commission were published on Thursday, explaining why Cavani was handed a minimum suspension under FA Rule E3.1. The full findings of the FA regulatory commission were published on Thursday, explaining why Cavani was handed a minimum suspension under FA Rule E3.1.

The English Football Association (FA) panel handed Edinson Cavani a three-match suspension despite acknowledging the Manchester United striker was not deliberately racist and had not known his language on social media was offensive.

Uruguay striker Cavani was last week banned for three games and fined 100,000 pounds (US$ 136,000) for posting an Instagram message to a friend with what the FA decided to be a racist term after his Manchester United side’s 3-2 win over Southampton on Nov. 29.

The full findings of the FA regulatory commission were published on Thursday, explaining why Cavani was handed a minimum suspension under FA Rule E3.1.

“The commission were satisfied that the player wrote his reply in affectionate appreciation of a message from his Uruguayan friend and that it was not designed or intended to be racist or offensive either to his friend or others reading the content of the Instagram post,” the FA commission said.

“Such a conclusion was supported by all the available evidence relevant to the circumstances in which the post was made and having regard to the character and response of the player... However, it is not sufficient that the player simply had no such intent.”

The FA argued that “a follower of English Premier League football” would have deemed the word “negrito” as racially offensive.

The South American Football Confederation (CONMEBOL), Uruguay Football Association, Uruguayan national team players and the Uruguayan Academy of Language have criticized England’s FA, and arguments, for banning Cavani, who joined United in October.

“The judgement of these types of statements, within the framework of a process that can lead to penalties for the athlete and that affect his reputation and good name, must always be carried out taking into account the context in which they were made and, above all, cultural peculiarities of each player and each country,” CONMEBOL said in a statement this week.

Cavani has already served two games of his three-match ban and will miss Saturday's FA Cup third-round tie against Watford.

The FA commission expressed surprise about lack of media training offered by United upon Cavani’s arrival so that he be “better placed to understand the cultural differences that might give rise to issues with a foreign player posting information on a social media platform”.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Little J

    All and sundry agreed that there is no racial slur in the phrase “hola negrito” which is a very common expression of endearment or appreciation of a person and used mainly perhaps in Uruguay and Argentina. Nevertheless Cavani was suspended for 3 matches and fined a figure in the region of Pds.100.000,00
    The argument being that “some follower of English Premier League Football” may consider it to be offensive is the culmination of stupidity and absolute nonsense. If they did consider it “offensive” they should have first of all found out a little more of the “culprit's” background and culture of the country he originates from, before becoming so pious.

    Jan 08th, 2021 - 05:47 pm +2
  • Terence Hill

    “Was not deliberately racist and had not known his language on social media was offensive.”
    Perhaps the FA regulatory commission should bear some responsibility in imparting such important information directly. So that such players as Cavani don't have to be put through the wringer and have their motives impugned.

    Posted 6 days ago 0
  • Skip

    Perhaps Cavani should remember that he doesn't live in Uruguay or anymore and act more appropriately.

    Or is cultural sensitivity only applicable to others when they live or travel in a different country?

    Jan 09th, 2021 - 01:59 am -2
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!