The Argentine Foreign Ministry summoned British Ambassador Kirsty Hayes to express the “concern” of the government of President Javier Milei over recent unilateral actions taken by the United Kingdom in the South Atlantic, including Foreign Secretary David Cameron's recent visit to the Falkland/Malvinas Islands and London's announcement to expand the Marine Protected Area. Read full article
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesHasn't the Argentine Foreign Minister got anything better to do? like maybe make the coffee.
Mar 12th, 2024 - 11:45 am - Link - Report abuse +7Just tell them its none of their business who Cameron visits, and none of their business what goes on in the Falkland Islands, a pathetic story from a pathetic people,
Mar 12th, 2024 - 12:01 pm - Link - Report abuse +12“concern” of the government of President Javier Milei over recent unilateral actions taken by the United Kingdom in the South Atlantic, including Foreign Secretary David Cameron's recent visit to the Falkland/Malvinas Islands and London's announcement to expand the Marine Protected Area...
Mar 12th, 2024 - 12:07 pm - Link - Report abuse +8The marine protection area extends around Argentina's imaginary territories.
They have to keep up the pretence...
Argentina’s continental shelf claims before the UN and the reality - Argentina's Continental Shelf Claims and The UN CLCA Commission (1 page):-
https://www.academia.edu/33898951/Argentinas_Continental_Shelf_Claims_-The_UN_CLCS_Commission
And what does international law say about the ownership of natural resources and Continental shelves?
Time to learn!
Mar 12th, 2024 - 05:53 pm - Link - Report abuse +8The UK Foreign Ministry must summon the Argentine Ambassador to express the “concern” of the government of King Charles III over every single unilateral actions anywhere in the world taken by Argentina without permission from the UK Foreign Ministry.
express the “concern” of the government of President Javier Milei over recent unilateral actions taken by the United Kingdom in the South Atlantic,
Mar 15th, 2024 - 03:21 pm - Link - Report abuse -1CHARTER OF THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES
Part One Chapter II PRINCIPLES
Article 3
The American States reaffirm the following principles:
a) International law is the standard of conduct of States in their reciprocal relations;
b) International order consists essentially of respect for the personality, sovereignty, and independence of States, and the faithful fulfillment of obligations derived from treaties and other sources of international law;
e) ..and has the duty to abstain from intervening in the affairs of another State. ...
Chapter IV FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF STATES
Article 11
Every American State has the duty to respect the rights enjoyed by every other State in accordance with
international law.
Article 12
The fundamental rights of States may not be impaired in any manner whatsoever.
Article 13
The political existence of the State is independent of recognition by other States. Even before being
recognized, the State has the right to defend its integrity and independence, to provide for its preservation and prosperity, and consequently to organize itself as it sees fit, to legislate concerning its interests, to administer its services, and to determine the jurisdiction and competence of its courts. The exercise of these rights is limited only by the exercise of the rights of other States in accordance with international law.
Article 19
No State or group of States has the right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever, in the internal or external affairs of any other State. The foregoing principle prohibits not only armed force but also any other form of interference or attempted threat against the personality of the State or against its political, economic, and cultural elements.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNw1SSz18Gg
Mar 19th, 2024 - 03:57 pm - Link - Report abuse -1A check of my O.O.D shows also shows as such, as a sub-entry. But, I have never heard an English speaker ever reference a `thumb` as a `finger` period
Mar 19th, 2024 - 08:59 pm - Link - Report abuse 0But, it`s of no help to you, and your `orignal fraud by omission` claim.
So I get a `thumbs-up`, and you get a `thumbs-down`.
As your fraud shows you were just guesing, and didn`t know.
So your stuck with the `finger`, and the bird.
Clinker your enabler lost out as he held to his fraud 'fraud by omission', as the citation he was relying on specifically.
nullifies any and all of his claims. As “A man cannot be permitted to take advantage of his own wrong.”
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!