MercoPress. South Atlantic News Agency

“Evidence” on Iranian nuclear weapons is about as reliable as Trump himself

Tulsi Gabbard, former U.S. Director of National Intelligence told Congress just two months ago that U.S. intelligence agencies had concluded Iran was not building nuclear weapons.

By Gwynne Dyer - Tulsi Gabbard, the recently resigned, retired or fired U.S. Director of National Intelligence told Congress just two months ago that U.S. intelligence agencies had concluded Iran was not building nuclear weapons. Indeed, she said, experts also determined Iran had not resumed its suspended 2003 nuclear weapons program.

However, U.S. President Donald Trump said she was “wrong.” His claim that “Iran would have had a nuclear weapon within two weeks to four weeks” had been his justification, however improbable, for attacking Iran on Feb. 28. Gabbard went silent.

When Trump started up again last week, saying Iran has a “maximum” of two weeks to sign a deal on its nuclear activities or else he restarts his war, Gabbard backed his lies. Iran is “at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months.” she said. She’s loyal to the end, but this is so stupid it’s insulting.

How can Iran have no active nuclear weapons program in March of 2026, but be within “two to four weeks” of nuclear weapons only a couple of months later? Almost all the “evidence” about Iranian nuclear weapons is about as reliable as Trump himself.

You will encounter references to this “nuclear weapons program” literally every day in the media, as though it were a universally acknowledged fact, but it’s not a fact at all. It’s an allegation that feels like a fact because it has been said so many times, so loudly, by so many people. However, the evidence is purely circumstantial, and quite possibly wrong.

Iran’s late supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, published a fatwa (religious ruling) in 2004 forbidding Muslims to use nuclear weapons: “We consider the use of these weapons to be haram (forbidden), and the effort to protect mankind from this great disaster is everyone’s duty.”

Khamenei clearly believed in the sinfulness of killing millions of people. However, he was quite vague when he discussed building nuclear weapons for deterrence only. In fact, he made a distinction between “our religious fatwa and our rational fatwa.”

And it stayed shut down well past 2015, when all the great powers signed a deal with Iran.  Former U.S. president Barack Obama’s deal, if you like. It guaranteed that, for 15 years Iran would not enrich uranium beyond 3.67 per cent, and Iran obeyed it to the letter until Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu persuaded Trump to tear it up in 2018.

The Iranians did nothing for a couple of years, hoping he other signatories to the treaty could talk sense into Trump. Then, they did something stupid. They started enriching uranium fuel beyond the treaty limit, though very slowly and still far short of weapons grade.

It took them four years to go from 20 per cent to 60 per cent, and they announced every step in advance. They weren’t trying to break out of the treaty; they were trying to make the other countries return to it. But it allowed hostile governments to claim Iran is now actively seeking nuclear weapons.

It isn’t. Not even now. Even before the United States and Israel attacked Iran eleven weeks ago, it was at least two years of hard work away from a working nuclear weapon. Indeed, it had not even begun working on it.

One big reason everybody else stands by and let the U.S. and Israel pound Iran into the ground is the regime is revolting: murderous, tyrannical and corrupt. But Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu are vigilantes, not police officers, and their war is illegal. They are war criminals.