Coal power opposition goes global

Saturday, August 14th 2010 - 08:48 UTC

Full article 20 comments

Almost 10,000 people from 100 countries have objected to plans for a new coal-fired power station at Hunterston in Ayrshire, Scotland, it was revealed yesterday (Friday 13 August) by WWF.

With one week to go before the official public consultation period ends, approaching 10,000 people have submitted objections by letter, postcard or via the environmental organisation’s website - http://wwf.panda.org/action/hunterston . From Bangladesh and Bulgaria to Uganda and Venezuela, WWF said that objections are pouring in daily to join the thousands already received from local residents and other concerned individuals throughout Scotland.

The proposal is the only live application for new coal-fired power station in the UK. Although the developers claim it is a clean-coal development, in reality 80 per cent of emissions would go straight into the atmosphere adding to global climate change.

WWF said that those responding have expressed their anger at the plans which would lead to an increase in carbon emissions and make a mockery of Scotland’s world leading climate change targets.

Commenting on the unprecedented show of global opposition to the plans WWF International President, Yolanda Kakabadse, from Ecuador said:

“When Scotland’s world-leading climate laws were passed it was rightly hailed as a great example for the world to follow. Plans for coal-fired power plants that do not capture all the emissions from day one, put that leadership in question. The eyes of the world are watching and hoping that Scotland will reject this proposal and continue to show that climate change can't be addressed without vision, policy and action - Scotland must continue to walk the talk.”

Dr Richard Dixon, Director of WWF Scotland said:

“With this huge public outcry, it is clear that a new coal-fired power station at Hunterston is not only unnecessary but it is also deeply unpopular. This polluting plant is now being opposed locally, nationally and internationally and will face a very rough ride through the planning process. We urge the Scottish Government to consider the views of people not only in this country, but also from abroad, whose lives could be seriously affected by the damaging effects of climate change.

“Scotland does not need new coal, as research published by WWF and other groups shows. A combination of improved energy efficiency and increased use of Scotland's wealth of clean renewables is more than adequate.”

By Lang Banks - WWF - Scotland

Categories: Environment, International.

Tags: Scotland, WWF.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules

harrier61
This is interesting. Wonderful Scotland, keen on its independence from the United Kingdom, plans to build a coal-fired power station. Personally, although I am a member of WWF, I don't care. Scotland has a devolved government and, as far as I'm concerned, can do what it likes on its own territory. An attitude I recommend to people ”From Bangladesh and Bulgaria to Uganda and Venezuela.
As far as the UK is concerned, we will be building 11 or 12 nuclear power stations. Technology that Scotland doesn't have. But we might let them have some electricity, if they ask very nicely and the rest of us don't need it!
Aug 14th, 2010 - 02:36 pm 0
JF
harrier61: I'm a member of WWF but i do care.

Yes, Scotland can do what it likes. but here's a few facts: 1) Scotland does have nuclear (two power stations at Torness and Hunterston) 2) Scotland is a net exporter of electricity (mainly to England and some to N.Ireland) 3) By the company's own admission in the press, the proposed coal-fired power station is being built not for Scotland's needs but to generate even more electricity for England and N.Ireland (i.e. not Scotland). 4) The proposal is considered so polluting and unnecessary that the campaign is supported by WWF in Scotland, England and globally.

So, here we have yet another example where one country is asked to take a polluting company to generate power, profits for another country's benefit. It is no better than rich countries exploiting timber from the Amazon, fish from African waters, precious metals from Latin America.

I say: well done to the people of “Bangladesh and Bulgaria to Uganda and Venezuela” for spotting an injustice. They are supporting the resistance of local people and others in Scotland. Well done for caring about others.
Aug 14th, 2010 - 10:49 pm 0
Think
(2) JF
Nice to see that they are intelligent readers in here (Mercopress) that don't want to let erroneus comments stand alone without a proper answer....

Think
The Argentinean
Aug 15th, 2010 - 05:39 am 0

Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!