MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, May 4th 2024 - 17:45 UTC

 

 

Transition processes in Argentina and Brazil seen from Washington

Thursday, November 11th 2010 - 11:41 UTC
Full article 19 comments
Female leaders, Dilma Rousseff  and Cristina Fernandez Female leaders, Dilma Rousseff and Cristina Fernandez

The Washington Post in one of this week’s editorials referred to the ‘transition process’ going on in South America’s two largest economies, Argentina and Brazil, after almost a decade of populist leadership.

In Argentina, the death of the “leader of the tandem” (Nestor Kirchner) that has controlled the country provides an opportunity for President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner to move away from his polarizing style and inept handling of the economy, ahead of next year’s presidential election.

In Brazil, president-elect Dilma Rousseff, an able technocrat in President Lula da Silva’s government has to prove she can match her predecessor’s skilful balancing of economic conservatism and populist activism. Furthermore she inherits a swollen government payroll, an overvalued currency and a backlog of infrastructure bottlenecks.

Follows the editorial: South American transition

For most of the past decade, two leftist populists dominated South America's largest countries. One, Argentina's Nestor Kirchner was of the stripe that so often has held back a potentially prosperous region: quasi-authoritarian and economically inept. The other, Brazil's Luiz Ignacio Lula da Silva, created a new mix of free-market orthodoxy, anti-poverty efforts and international activism. Now, within a week, both have been supplanted. Mr. Kirchner's death Oct. 27 of a heart attack left his wife, Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner - Argentina's current president - unmoored. Mr. Lula da Silva's chosen successor, Dilma Rousseff, won a presidential election runoff Oct. 31. Those two women will now lead their neighbouring G-20 countries in potentially difficult transitions.

Brazil gets most of the attention, and with good reason. Under Mr. Lula da Silva, the country has come to be grouped with China and India as an emerging global power. It is growing faster than any other nation in the hemisphere and is preparing to exploit deep-sea oil discoveries that may make it a major energy producer. Having started adulthood in an armed leftist group, Ms. Rousseff, now 62, proved to be an able technocrat in Mr. Lula da Silva's government. But she may find it difficult to match her predecessor's skilful balancing of economic conservatism and populist activism - especially as she inherits a swollen state payroll, an overvalued currency and a big backlog of infrastructure bottlenecks. The clearest sign so far of her direction is a vow to expand the state's role in the exploitation of the new oil fields, which could make some of those problems worse. If Ms. Rousseff also retreats from responsible fiscal policies, Brazil could suffer another one of the stalls that in the past have stopped its spurts toward greatness.

Though Ms. Fernandez de Kirchner is a formidable politician in her own right, her husband had appeared to be the leader of a tandem that has controlled Argentina's government since 2002. His death, though tragic for his wife, provides an opportunity to move away from his polarizing style, which has included attempts to silence critical media and concentrate power. With a presidential election due next year, the country will have the chance to choose something like the more workable course of Mr. Lula da Silva.
 

Categories: Politics, Latin America.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Forgetit87

    Awful text. Couldn't expect better from the WP, though.

    Nov 11th, 2010 - 01:17 pm 0
  • xbarilox

    “For most of the past decade, two leftist populists dominated South America's largest countries.” ???? Is it wrong to be a populist? What was Bush then? Are you guys at The WP looking to South America or what?

    Nov 11th, 2010 - 02:55 pm 0
  • Forgetit87

    “Populist” in American usage has become a jargon applied to less than fully pro-American leaders in developing countries who try and direct public resources to poverty reduction instead of relying on the “wonders” of the free market only. And you're correct about Mr Bush, barilox. He and the Republic Party have made use of a rhetoric of jingoism and irrationality that, if spotted in some other area in the world, would be considered by those American journalists as a sign of populist decadence.

    Nov 11th, 2010 - 03:05 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!