MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, April 19th 2019 - 00:59 UTC

The Guardian: “Britain is asleep over Argentina and the Falklands”

Monday, December 26th 2011 - 11:18 UTC
Full article 36 comments
Sources of oil under the South Atlantic seas are now, of course, part of the equation Sources of oil under the South Atlantic seas are now, of course, part of the equation

In a piece published last week in London daily The Guardian, and referred to the recent Mercosur support for Argentina in the Falkland Islands dispute, Richard Gott argues that a new scenario has emerged with South America growing in strength, increasingly united and no longer looking to Europe for support and advice which means a different framework for the Falkland Islands s sovereignty dispute.

“The truth is the background music had changed” says Gott which therefore common sense seems to suggest that the two countries involved in the dispute Argentina and UK should meet to negotiate a solution.

Mr. Richard Gott is a writer and historian. He worked for many years at The Guardian as a leader-writer, foreign correspondent and as the features editor. He is the author of Cuba: A New History, published by Yale University Press

The full article follows:

In British diplomatic circles, no one dares to even discuss the future of the Falkland Islands. As far as they are concerned, the issue is settled. There is nothing to talk about, still less to negotiate. And this policy is unlikely to change following the news that the South American trading bloc, Mercosur – which includes not only Argentina but Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay –has agreed to close its ports to all ships flying the Falklands’ flag.

To reinforce British diplomats' wilful blindness, the Foreign Office has closed half a dozen embassies in Latin America in recent years, to minimise the danger of receiving subversive opinions from foreign capitals. All part of Britain's national decline.

Given that Argentina and Britain both have a good claim to the Islands, common sense would suggest that the two countries should meet to negotiate a solution, and that is exactly what Argentina's president, Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner has often suggested. She has not been “ratcheting up the pressure”, still less has she been preparing the Argentine military for an attack. She is merely reiterating a longstanding policy, one that is ensconced permanently in the country's constitution.

Argentina has had a democratic government for nearly 30 years, and the military are wholly discredited as a result of their participation in the “dirty war” of the 1970s as well as for their fruitless assault on the Islands in 1982. They are confined to barracks and have neither the funds nor the weapons nor the inclination to seize the Islands.

What has changed in recent years is the political climate in Latin America. New governments have appeared across the continent with a progressive and nationalist agenda. They do not always see eye to eye with each other, their views on economic policy may differ, but they are united in believing their continent should organise itself for the benefit of its own peoples without outside interference.

This is an age-old aspiration, dating back to the 19th century, but in recent years new organisations have been created to give this idea coherence. Some deal with the mundane operations of banking and energy, others have more ambitious political plans, notably the recently established Community of Latin American and Caribbean States. All give voice to the desire to go their own way, without the controlling hand of the US –or indeed of Britain, America's close ally.

Sources of oil under the South Atlantic seas are now, of course, part of the equation, and if oil is found in commercial quantities it will be difficult for any company to exploit it without the assistance and co-operation of the Argentine mainland. In such an event the Foreign Office will be obliged to awake from its long, self-imposed slumber.

The UK complained about Mercosur action this week, but President José Mujica of Uruguay replied swiftly ”we hold nothing against the UK, but we have a lot in favour of Argentina”.

Traditionally the Foreign Office tells reporters, sotto voce, that the governments of Latin America (and, importantly, these alliances now include Caribbean countries with historical ties to Britain) speak with forked tongues and do not really support the Argentine claim to the Falklands.

Yet the truth is that the background music has changed. The countries of Latin America no longer look to Europe and the US for support and advice. They have grown to like doing their own thing. This week Argentina's claim to the Falklands has been powerfully reinforced.

Sources of oil under the South Atlantic seas are now, of course, part of the equation

 

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Lord Ton

    Gott !

    http://falklandsnews.wordpress.com/

    Dec 26th, 2011 - 11:59 am 0
  • O gara

    Its really good to see more realism in the City press.The guardian joins the Independent.The ultra conservative Telgraph admitted England cant defend the islands today.
    But CFK has no intention of invading anywhere shes far too busy directing Argentina threw the stormy waters of the world crisis with 9% growth in 2011 and over 5% in 2012 projected even by La Nacion.
    In the meantime The UK heads for recession at best,its breakup whenever Salmond pulls the plug and its complete isolation in Europe.

    Dec 26th, 2011 - 12:24 pm 0
  • Lord Ton

    Dream on O'Gaga :-)

    Dec 26th, 2011 - 12:50 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!