EU trade ministers agreed on Friday to approve a free trade pact with Colombia and Peru that could boost European car and chemical exports and lift food and mineral exports from the South American countries. Read full article
bilateral agreements are better than that mercosur nonsense. I still cannot understand why the EU insists on agreements with half-nice half-nasty trading blocs.
Because they have an intense desire to control the natural resources of both Peru and Colombia. It is all about control. And, since when is Colombia or Peru consider half nasty? Both pursue the concept of making their people as poor and dependent on the government as do most EU countries.
KFC do Pollo #3. You jerk! Try to control your emotions.
Actually, I did not read it incorrectly. GreekYoghurt wrote: I still cannot understand why the EU insists on agreements with half-nice half-nasty trading blocs.. That statement says he doesn't understand why the EU insists on agreements with half-nice half_nasty trading blocs. That directly implies that Colombia and Peru (the trading block) is half-nice and half-nasty. Whether or not that's what GreekYoghurt meant, at this point is beside the point. KFC, you are an idiot and, obviously can't read! I really don't like having to be so direct and apply personal criticisms, but you asked for it! Jerk!
@5 Are you really that retarded that you cannot understand what I wrote? it's not ambiguous, there is no uncertainty. Let's teach the imbeciles again.
Peru and Colombia are not trading blocks.. they are nations, indivisible trading blocks of one. They can't be half nice, half nasty.
Mercosur is a trading block consisting of several states. Some of which are nice, e.g. brasil. Some of which are just nasty rogue incompetent mafia-run hell holes, e.g. Argentina.
Covering for your own imbecility by lashing out at KFC is not covering for your own imbecility. You look like an imbecile who cannot comprehend simple english.
There certainly is a new day tomorrow. My apologies. BTW, it was KFC who started the nasty comments. However, that said, I should not have allowed myself to be sucked into such an exchange. In the future, I'll just ignore them.
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesbilateral agreements are better than that mercosur nonsense. I still cannot understand why the EU insists on agreements with half-nice half-nasty trading blocs.
Mar 17th, 2012 - 11:22 am - Link - Report abuse 0Because they have an intense desire to control the natural resources of both Peru and Colombia. It is all about control. And, since when is Colombia or Peru consider half nasty? Both pursue the concept of making their people as poor and dependent on the government as do most EU countries.
Mar 17th, 2012 - 04:30 pm - Link - Report abuse 0laceja are you stupid? he is saying Mercorsur is half nice half nasty.
Mar 17th, 2012 - 04:48 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@3 Hmm.. I don't think she read what i wrote very well.
Mar 17th, 2012 - 05:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0KFC do Pollo #3. You jerk! Try to control your emotions.
Mar 17th, 2012 - 06:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Actually, I did not read it incorrectly. GreekYoghurt wrote: I still cannot understand why the EU insists on agreements with half-nice half-nasty trading blocs.. That statement says he doesn't understand why the EU insists on agreements with half-nice half_nasty trading blocs. That directly implies that Colombia and Peru (the trading block) is half-nice and half-nasty. Whether or not that's what GreekYoghurt meant, at this point is beside the point. KFC, you are an idiot and, obviously can't read! I really don't like having to be so direct and apply personal criticisms, but you asked for it! Jerk!
@5 Are you really that retarded that you cannot understand what I wrote? it's not ambiguous, there is no uncertainty. Let's teach the imbeciles again.
Mar 17th, 2012 - 07:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Peru and Colombia are not trading blocks.. they are nations, indivisible trading blocks of one. They can't be half nice, half nasty.
Mercosur is a trading block consisting of several states. Some of which are nice, e.g. brasil. Some of which are just nasty rogue incompetent mafia-run hell holes, e.g. Argentina.
Covering for your own imbecility by lashing out at KFC is not covering for your own imbecility. You look like an imbecile who cannot comprehend simple english.
Get over it, there is a new day tomorrow.
There certainly is a new day tomorrow. My apologies. BTW, it was KFC who started the nasty comments. However, that said, I should not have allowed myself to be sucked into such an exchange. In the future, I'll just ignore them.
Mar 17th, 2012 - 10:20 pm - Link - Report abuse 0This is how Cristina Kirchner the most corrupt president in all of South America and her cronies get into power:
Mar 20th, 2012 - 10:53 am - Link - Report abuse 0www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyPC0SD0PGw
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!