The Economist argues that with the latest legislation, the Argentine central bank has lost its legal independence and become the piggy bank of President Cristina Fernandez government.
FOR the past 20 years a plaque has adorned the lobby of Argentina’s Central Bank, proclaiming its “primary and fundamental mission to preserve the value of the currency”. This week the plaque was removed after the country’s Congress approved a government bill that gives the bank a new, wordier mandate: “to promote, to the extent of its ability and in the framework of policies established by the national government, monetary stability, financial stability, jobs and economic growth with social fairness”.
Put more simply, the bank has lost the last shred of its legal independence and become the piggy bank of President Cristina Fernández government. It can now be required to transfer to the treasury cash equal to 20% of government revenues plus 12% of the money supply; to use its reserves (of 47 billion dollars) at will to pay government debts; and to play a more active role in regulating banks and in steering credit to favored industries.
After forcing out the bank’s governor, Martín Perez Redrado, in 2010, Ms Fernández has used more than 16 billion dollars of reserves to pay debt, and earmarked 5.7 billion for 2012. But there was a hiccup: under the old law, which dated from the currency board in effect in the 1990s, the government could only spend reserves above the amount needed to back up the stock of pesos in circulation, and it had already exhausted that amount. Rather than “brutal belt-tightening,” as Mercedes Marcó del Pont, Mr Perez Redrado’s replacement, put it, the government changed the law.
Ms Fernández, like her husband and predecessor, Néstor Kirchner, has relentlessly pursued economic growth. This is getting harder. Public finances have fallen into deficit thanks to bloated subsidies used mainly to keep utility and transport tariffs low. As the current-account surplus diminishes, the government has imposed curbs on imports and stricter capital controls. The latest protectionist measure requires buyers of books from foreign websites to collect them personally from the airport and pay a fee of up to 80 dollars.
The government could now use the Central Bank’s reserves to pay the 9.3 billion it owes to the Paris Club of creditor governments—an obstacle to its being able to tap international capital markets. But the immediate effect of the change in the law has been to stoke worries that inflation will take off, putting pressure on the peso. The gap between the official exchange rate and the rate in the swap market has widened to nearly 20%. But Ms Marcó del Pont insists that the bank will be “very rigorous” and will not print more pesos than needed. The government’s fairly low debt burden and its strict curbs on capital flight may prevent a rapid collapse of the peso.
Another sign of the government’s growing desperation is its bullying of YPF, a unit of Spain’s Repsol. As the former state oil monopoly, YPF tugs at nationalist heartstrings. Government-inspired posters recently went up in Buenos Aires showing YPF’s logo, a map of the Falkland Islands and the statement: “They’re Argentine.”
Ms Fernández blames YPF for a fall in output of oil (down 32% since its peak in 1998) and gas (down 10% since 2004). Oilmen blame the government: producers receive just $42 per barrel for exports and around $70 in the domestic market, whereas the world-market price is over $120.
Repsol has offered to pay YPF’s 2011 dividend in stock, and not to repatriate profits. But the government wants the dividend paid into a special investment fund. It is not clear whether the president’s aim is re-nationalization: she would find it hard to raise the funds, although her threats have depressed YPF’s share price by 14% this year. Six provinces have stripped YPF of oil concessions, but mostly minor ones.
What makes all this perverse is that Argentina sits on possibly the world’s third-biggest reserves of shale hydrocarbons. YPF estimates that developing them will cost 25 billion dollars a year for a decade. Not even the Central Bank can provide Ms Fernández with funds like that. But short-term political need, rather than long-term prosperity, is dictating Argentine politics.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!
Obviously furked politically-isolated hell-hole is obviously furked.Apr 01st, 2012 - 09:06 am 0
The Economist is a liar, at least that's what the Brits told me last week.Apr 01st, 2012 - 01:04 pm 0
'the Brits' music awards told you this? Gosh, you're hearing things from the TV again?Apr 01st, 2012 - 01:54 pm 0
The Economist is a great read. it tells me lots of things like not to invest in Argentina and not to talk to Argentinians. I had to learn the hard way not to go near Argentinians with their poo-trousers, but I wish a magazine existed to tell me not to. Trial and error eh.