Uruguay’s government-financed national university came up in position 79 in the QS academic quality international ranking of the top 100 Latinamerican universities. Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia were far better ranked than Uruguay’s Universidad de la Republica, Udelar, which has caused deep concern among government officials.
The annual report from Quacquarelli Symonds, one of the most prestigious international companies in the assessment of universities academic level and achievements has been doing the ranking at global level since 2004, but on 2011 started a special branch dedicated to Latin America.
Brazilian and Chilean universities lead the pack followed by Mexico, Colombia and Argentina. Top of the list is the University of Sao Paulo; followed by the Catholic University of Chile; Campinas State university, Brazil; University of Chile; Mexico’s National Autonomous university; University of the Andes, Colombia; Monterrey Technology Institute, Mexico; the Federal university of Rio do Janeiro; University of Concepción, Chile; University of Santiago de Chile and the University of Buenos Aires.
The QS ranking take into consideration six basic indicators, with different percentages, to elaborate the listing: academic reputation from Global survey which accounts 40%; employer reputation from Global survey, 10%; citations per faculty from Sciverse Scopus, 20%: faculty/student ratio, 20%; proportion of international students, 5% and proportion of international faculty, 5%.
While the Uruguayan university achieved 46.1 points, the University of Sao Paulo, the first ranked had 100 points, according to QS. However the performance of Udelar climbed 15 points from 2011, when it ranked in post 94.
Of the six indicators Udelar is best positioned in the citations per faculty with 96.7 points, equivalent to post 12. It ranks the lowest in the faculty/student ratio, with only 3.9 points and ranks 151.
Earlier this year Scimago Journal & Country Rank which includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus database, assessed 1.401 universities in 43 different countries and Udelar figured in position 70, but 32 if ranked only among Latinamerican universities.
One of the indicators considered for this evaluation was the number of scientific papers published between 2006 and 2010. Udelar figures with 2.664 papers, however Sao Paulo University recorded 44.610 and the Buenos Aires University, 10.555.
None of Uruguay’s private universities or tertiary centres figured in the QS ranking.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesUruguay is a very small country. They got a population of about 3,5 million.
Aug 06th, 2012 - 11:51 pm 0That's 1/5 of Chile's, 1/12 of Argentinas and 1/55 of Brazil's population, so keep that in mind when considering the amount of Universities in comparison to the rest of LA.
Nevertheless, they are considered one of the countries with highest education standards, so their ranking here is indeed dissapointing.
I'm surprised that the UBA figures in the ranking, it is not a good university. I wonder if the quality of the scientific papers is taken into account or only the quantity?
Aug 07th, 2012 - 04:00 pm 0Hi Simon, I think they consider the citation quantity (How would you define a meassuring indicator for quality?)
Aug 07th, 2012 - 08:41 pm 0If I am not mistaken, it's the high amount of citations of scientific papers which keep the UBA in the TOP 15, while the big amount of student ratio has diluted the quality somewhat.
Here you can check the different indicators considered for the ranking:
http://content.qs.com/wur/QS_World_University_Rankings_Latin_America_supplement2012.pdf
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!