Argentina has no interest whatsoever in fisheries conservation, Chair of the Falkland Islands Fishing Companies Association (FIFCA) Cheryl Roberts stated this week, and Director of Natural Resources John Barton believes an Argentine action aimed at undermining the Falklands fishery is likely to have a negative impact on their own fishery.
They responded to news from the Argentine finance media, and reported on by MercoPress earlier this week, that the Argentine Federal Fisheries Council resolution to allow the registry of 20 additional jiggers in Argentine waters (with straddling fish stocks with the Falklands) was a political move against the Falklands and that local Argentine fishing chambers have in fact protested against the additional jiggers.
Mrs Roberts said: This follows on from their totally inappropriate decision to open the Argentine 2012 squid season early. I said then that such a decision had scant regard for potential impact on conservation in our fishing zone in Falklands’ waters, or their own in Argentine waters”.
She said to then go on to add another 20 vessels to their ilex fleet proved their interest was political, saying it highlighted to the rest of the world, “the difficulty we face when having to work alongside such neighbors”.
“Whether the inclusion of additional vessels will have an effect will be unknown until it is too late of course.”
FIFCA Vice-Chair Hamish Wylie described it as “environmental terrorism,” adding “we already know from the Argentine media, that the main objective behind licensing the premature fishing of illex is to decimate the stock. This is in order to make the Falklands’ fishery less attractive to the foreign fishing vessels on which our Islands economy depends.
“That the Argentines should engage in such environmental terrorism for political objectives should remind the world of how little their country has really changed in the past 30 years,” he said
John Barton commented “I think the key point is that there are a number of initiatives which could improve the outlook for illex squid. These include some of the actions which used to happen ten years ago under the auspices of the South Atlantic Fisheries Commission (SAFC) and prior to Argentina’s withdrawal from that process.
“At that time fisheries data was exchanged between the Falklands and Argentina allowing a better understanding of the illex squid stock, there were joint surveys of the illex resource, and there was the option for co-ordination of conservation measures. Conservation and management of illex could also benefit from a regional fisheries management organization; something which was also on the SAFC agenda.”
He said it would depend on the illex season whether there was much impact on the Falklands fishery. He warned “the bigger impact may be on their fishery.”
Another Falklands fishing industry insider said he too was not sure what the impact would be but, “I doubt that it will have much impact on what happens in the Falklands’ fishery but of course it is completely irresponsible of them to seek to increase the effort on the migrating illex regardless of the state of the stock simply for political ends.
“They seemingly take no account of their ecological and environmental responsibilities at all. In all probability it will be the Argentine fishing industry that suffers.” (PN).-
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!
And what's your problem, Mrs. Roberts? I thought you didn't need to work with Argentina in anything whatsoever, so what is you rant about working with such neighbors. No one is obligating you to work with us. We don't want to work with you, we walked out remember? So you can go on your merry way, you don't have to deal with us at all.Aug 31st, 2012 - 05:52 am 0
What you can't do is force us to surrender our waters to YOUR sovereignty, which is what you want. Sorry.
@1 TobiasAug 31st, 2012 - 06:29 am 0
Actually the Falkland Islands Government have been very willing to cooperate with Argentine on areas of mutual benefit. It's your government Tobias that refuses, and is now acting very irresponsibly, not only to the environment but to the future of Argentina.
Tell me, Tobias, if all the fish are gone, just what will all those people who rely on the fish for their livelihoods do? Starve?
Less fish will have an economic impact on Argentina and the Falklands. But that's what your president wants, to try and bankrupt the Falklands. But it really is a case of cutting off your nose to spite your face in this case.
The sooner these corrupt politicians are out of power the better, especially for Argentina.
Oh and as ever your posts are just bigoted rants, smacking of desperation. Since when have the Falklands ever wanted anything Argentine?
The fishing industry is such a tiny proportion of our GDP that we can toss it to he!! if we want to, won't make a dent in the economy.Aug 31st, 2012 - 06:42 am 0
Realistically, I don't like the idea of putting any innocent creature at risk for human pettyness. However, the Falklanders hunted a mammal to extinction so I immediately discard to the trash any indignation they may have on the environment.
Since when have the Falklands wanted anything Argentine?
Then don't ask for OUR cooperation??? Argentine cooperation is ARGENTINE! Make up your mind for hecks sake.