US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq will cost taxpayers up to 6 trillion dollars or 75.000 dollars for every US household, “the most expensive wars in US history,” a new report has revealed, adding that these campaigns will dominate future federal budgets “for decades to come”.
“The US has already spent close to 2 trillion dollars in direct outlays for expenses related to Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation New Dawn (OND),” said the 21-page Harvard report, titled ‘The Financial Legacy of Iraq and Afghanistan: How Wartime Spending Decisions Will Constrain Future National Security Budgets.’
There will be no peace dividend, is the stark conclusion from the 22-page report from the Kennedy School of Government, and the legacy of Iraq and Afghanistan wars will be costs that persist for decades.
To have an idea of the magnitude of the 6 trillion dollars, the US GDP is estimated at almost 15 trillion dollars, which means the costs of the war climbs to almost 40% of the country’s GDP.
The report also points out that this spending was “only a fraction” of total war costs. The “greatest expenses” which the report said were medical care and disability benefits, have yet to be paid to soldiers. In the future, an estimated 2.5 million veterans will receive state benefits.
“The legacy of decisions taken during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars will dominate future federal budgets for decades to come,” the report said, adding that the highest cost of payouts to WWI veterans only fell about 50 years after the end of the war.
Military benefits were increased in 2001, prior to the Iraq war, in terms of quality, quantity, availability and eligibility, placing an extra burden on defense spending. The action was taken to encourage the expansion of the US Military prior to the invasion.
The US government is already committed to paying the accrued costs, which currently stand at approximately 836.1 billion dollars, the study reported. Money borrowed to fund war costs has also made the controversial military campaigns even more expensive.
The new estimates top the 4 trillion reported in the 2011 ‘Costs of War’ study conducted by Brown University. A further, more recent ‘Costs of War’ report published earlier this month found that accrued interest on the nearly 2.2 trillion in expenses would amount to some 4 trillion dollars in the coming decades, suggesting that the overall costs could amount to around 6 trillion dollars.
The projected costs have risen steadily and dramatically since the beginning of the conflicts in 2003, 81.2 billion dollars was budgeted for the cost of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The White House downplayed estimates in 2003, saying it was impossible to accurately gauge what costs would be. Iraq alone was anticipated to cost some 50 to 60 billion, Budget Director Mitch Daniels told the New York Times in 2003.
In 2002, senior White House official Stephen Friedman was forced to resign after publicly estimating that the Iraq War could end up costing upwards of 200 billion. Later, in 2007, Defense Secretary Robert Gates asked Congress to approve an additional 42.3bn for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
The decision to finance the war through borrowing has already added 2 trillion to the US national debt, or about 20% of the total national debt added between 2001 and 2012.
More than half of the 1.56 million troops who have been discharged to date have received medical treatment at VA [Dept of Veteran Affairs] facilities and been granted benefits for the rest of their lives, the report said, adding that the real bills will be incurred for decades to come.
As a consequence of these wartime spending choices, the United States will face constraints in funding investments in personnel and diplomacy, research and development and new military initiatives.
The legacy of decisions taken during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars will dominate future federal budgets for decades to come.”
The human cost of the war is also difficult to ignore. Some 300.000 people have died directly from the warfare, including an estimated 125.000 civilians in Iraq. The 'Costs of War' report published earlier this month said that with the inclusion of slain journalists, aid workers and insurgents, the minimum death toll had reached an estimated 176.000 to 189.000.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesBush and poodle Blair have a lot to answer for - warmongers! The British people came out on the streets to protest in the biggest demo ever in the history of the UK and these Muppets just ignored it. It was just rednecks revenge as far as the US was concerned, revenge for the 9/11 attrocity that wasn't carried out by the people we attacked. The war to eject Sadaam from Kuwait was fair enough, a load of bullies descending on a small defenceless neighbour, but Iraq was not justified, and only a nation that doesn't know the region would be stupid enough to take on the Afghans. Captain America world police was an accurate film.
Apr 02nd, 2013 - 04:49 pm 0THIS GOES OUT TO ALL THE ARGIES WHO THINK THEY CAN AVOID THE US COURTS AND AVOID DEFAULT
Apr 02nd, 2013 - 05:08 pm 0http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2013/04/02/a-plan-b-for-argentina/
;D uh oh!
@2
Apr 02nd, 2013 - 06:37 pm 0Well, who's deflecting now, what a loser.
As I have said many times here, the terrorist will win the war.
Terrorist mount a succesful terrorist attack for $500k.
USA retaliates by spending $6 trillion and basically throwing the next two generations under the bus of austeriry and lower standard of living.
A couple more terrorist attacks, and they will bring the USA into default and bankrupcy. Maybe only one.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!