A United Nations investigator on Tuesday urged Chile’s government to stop using an anti-terrorism law against Mapuche Indians who are fighting to recover their ancestral land.
Violence in the Mapuche struggle escalated last year with a string of arson attacks, including one that killed an elderly couple. Their deaths shocked Chileans and raised questions about the inability of President Sebastian Piñera’s government to meet the demands of Chile’s largest indigenous group and his administration’s vow to continue using tough dictatorship-era measures to curb violence.
Ben Emmerson, the U.N. special investigator on human rights and counter-terrorism, said the situation is ‘‘volatile’’ in the southern regions of Araucania and Bio Bio, where most of the nearly one million Mapuche live.
Speaking after a two-week visit to Chile, he warned ‘‘that it could turn into a major regional conflict unless urgent action is taken to deal with the acts of violence.’’
He said Chilean prosecutors have enough legislation ‘‘at their disposal to investigate and punish crimes’’ without the need to use the terrorism law that dates from Gen. Augusto Pinochet’s 1973-90 dictatorship.
‘‘The anti-terrorist legislation has been used in a way that discriminates against the Mapuche. It has been applied in a confusing and arbitrary way, which has turned into a real injustice that has impaired the right to a fair trial. And it has been perceived as stigmatizing and de-legitimizing of the Mapuche territorial demands and protests,’’ Emmerson said.
Emmerson said Chile should come up with a strategy to solve the dispute, recognize the Mapuche under the constitution and speed up the return of their lands.
‘‘The preliminary conclusions of the U.N. official go along with what we've been saying: that there’s no terrorism and that this is a disproportionate law that only creates more tensions,’’ said Aucan Huilcaman, a Mapuche leader.
‘‘If Chile really wants to show its democratic side it must recognize the Mapuche people,’’ Huilcaman added.
Emmerson, who was invited to Chile by Piñera’s government, said the country must put an end to violence by police against the Mapuche.
The Mapuche, which means ‘‘people of the land’’ in their native Mapudungun language, resisted the Spanish conquest for 300 years and their desire for autonomy remains strong. It wasn’t until the late 19th century that they were defeated militarily and forced into Araucania, south of the Bio Bio river, about 550 kilometers south of the capital.
Most live in poverty on the fringes of timber companies or ranches owned by the descendants of those who arrived to the region in the late 1800s from Europe.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesOne can only agree, and hope that the UN pulls their pants all the way up and applies the same Justice to the Middle East.
Jul 31st, 2013 - 06:41 am 0I know very little about the current situation of the Mapuches in Chile but I know, because I read articles and listened plenty of interviews on TV, that in East side of the Andes the Mapuches people don't recognize Argentina as their country.
Jul 31st, 2013 - 08:03 am 0So, it's quite hard to find a solution while a minority have plenty of claims but doesn't recognize the authority. This is even worse when they receive plenty of subsidies from provinces or the National Government. Because this situation causes the anger of the people, the citizens, that are those who pay their taxes.
Quite different is the situation of the QOM people that they accept Argentina as their country but for some miserable political reasons CFK doesn't want to meet them to directly listen their problems and needs.
In addition, I would say that in Chile violence must be stopped by both sides. The Goverment has the obligation to stop violence and assure fair judicial actions. The Mapuche people have the obligation to act peacefully and with responsability as honest citizens.
In Buenos Aires, a couple of years ago, a Mapuche bombing destroyed the central offices of LAN in Buenos AIres downtown. As it was midnight nobody was killed but it was clearly a dangerous terrorist action.
@1 Oh, I agree. And then Israel can use laws against rioting, assault, aggravated assault, criminal activity, hate crime, murder (actual and attempted), racism, insurrection, against the so-called (and non-existent) palestinians.
Jul 31st, 2013 - 08:05 am 0Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!