MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, January 22nd 2022 - 15:41 UTC

 

 

The 2002 lost chance for the Gibraltar-Spain conflict according to former UK Europe minister Peter Hain

Wednesday, August 7th 2013 - 16:03 UTC
Full article 23 comments
Labour took distance from Peter Hain’s statements Labour took distance from Peter Hain’s statements

Former UK Europe Minister Peter Hain has said that the failure to recognise Spain’s historic claim over the Rock is the root of the issues Gibraltar has with its neighbours. Hain made his comments during an interview on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

He also suggested that Gibraltar reopens negotiations aimed at sharing sovereignty with Spain, according to a piece by Eyleen Sheil published in the Gibraltar Chronicle.

During the interview Mr Hain said that the first thing was Gibraltar’s rights: “Gibraltar’s rights and the rights of Gibraltarian citizens have to be protected there is no question about that, they can’t be treated in this way.”

He recalled when he tried to negotiate a resolution in 2002, under the Tony Blair administration. Asked why his negotiations didn’t work, he said: “Well in the end we negotiated an agreement on the 18th of April in Madrid, which protected Gibraltar’s rights”.

Referring to the effect the agreement could have had on Gibraltarians he added: “They remained British; they could have everything they enjoy now from a pint of beer to British citizenships and all their rights and customs and way of life.”

“But in the end, despite me having shaken hands with my opposite member the European Minister for Spain, Ramon De Miguel, they got cold feet at the last minute. The Spanish Prime Minister Aznar and Foreign Minister Piqué backed off, much to Miguel and my regrets,” he added.

Mr Hain said that it was an historic opportunity to have joint sovereignty which would have protected Gibraltarians’ way of life and they could have remained British citizens but also recognise Spain’s historic claim which is the root of this, stating that he believed Gibraltar needs to revisit the whole negotiations. He said that the broad terms of the agreement which were written up in July 2002 are already in the House of Commons and that the text is there ready to be used.

Mr Hain went on to say that Spanish people feel that “300 year ago Britain wrenched a part of Spain away from them”.

When asked if revisiting the negotiations will mean you have to review how Gibraltar views Spain and persuading Gibraltar to accept, if not share, full sovereignty and if Gibraltarians should be persuading to think different about their position, Mr Hain said; “Yes I do, there were many elements in Gibraltar’s society, in particular the business community, who strongly backed what I was trying to do and the stance of the last Government on this”.

He then compared the situation in Gibraltar to that of the situation during the Troubles in Northern Ireland. He said they also had a ‘we will not surrender’ attitude 30 to 40 years ago and that attitude has now changed.

Mr Hain said that resolution is possible and what you need is political leadership, the rights of Gibraltar on one hand, Spain’s historic claim to sovereignty on the other hand and Britain’s historic treaty obligations. He believes if the agreement is not looked at again and if we “don’t go down that road”, then the issue with Spain will be a running sore that will flare up and it will die down, but in the end, Gibraltar’s rights will not be guaranteed.

Referring back to the 2002 negotiations, he said the deal would have “transformed life for Gibraltarians” as “there would have been an open border, they would have had aeroplane access, telephone access, all the things which are bedevilling them at the moment”.

However Peter Hain views on Gibraltar are not those of the Labour Party, said Hadleigh Roberts, Labour Party candidate to the European Parliament for Gibraltar.

“The Labour Party continues to respect the Gibraltarian right to self-determination and their right to remain under British sovereignty” said Roberts. “To that extent, Peter Hain’s comments on joint-sovereignty were not a description of current Labour policy”.

“We remain convinced that the current tension must be resolved through dialogue, engagement and respect for the rights of Gibraltarian citizens,” he added.

Roberts - a fluent Spanish speaker who holds a degree in Spanish politics and history - said: “This dialogue must take place through the trilateral forum, which Labour created when in office. It is regrettable that the current Spanish central Government is the only party that refuses to participate in the trilateral forum”.
 

Categories: Politics, International.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • LEPRecon

    Mr Hain, the ONLY resolution possible is for Spain to recognise that the people of Gibraltar have RIGHTS including the right to self-determination.

    Your attempt in 2002 to stab them in the back failed BECAUSE the people of Gibraltar exercised their rights.

    Gibraltar is a self-governing British Overseas Territory. They rule themselves, and won't be dictated to, either from London or Madrid.

    As I recall, Mr Hain, a good proportion of the British people thought you were a back-stabbing traitor in 2002.

    As for Gibraltar being Spanish, they're not, and they actually HAVE NEVER BEEN a part of Spain.

    Let's work chronologically backwards:

    2013 AD - Gibraltar continues to exercise it's right to self-determination (as laid out in the UN Charter).
    2002 AD - Mr Hain tries to stab Gibraltar in the back by trying to give their lands and homes away WITHOUT their consent (which is in breach of the UN Charter)
    1713 AD - The treaty of Utrecht is signed ceding Gibraltar to Britain in perpetuity
    1704 AD - A joint British/Dutch force capture Gibraltar from the Kingdom of Castile (not Spain)
    1502 AD - the final muslims are forced out of what would become Spain
    1492 AD - the Christians force the majority of Moors out of what would become Spain
    711 AD - the Moors invade 'Spain' and force the Vandals out
    409 AD - the Vandals invade and force the Romans out
    218 BC - the Roman's invade Spain
    Prior to Rome's invasion Celtic tribes: the Lusitani, Celtiberians and Iberians lived in 'Spain'.
    There is also evidence that Neanderthals also lived in Spain.

    So as you can see, Mr Hain, Gibraltar was only Spanish for approximately 202 years, and even then it was actually the Kingdom of Castille NOT the Kingdom of Spain.

    So 'technically' Spain has NEVER held sovereignty over Gibraltar. So by what right can they claim sovereignty over this territory?

    Aug 07th, 2013 - 05:07 pm 0
  • Dominic H.

    What part of “ceded in perpetuity” does Hain misunderstand? You cannot have a claim to something you traded away. And even if the Treaty of Utrecht doesn't apply in modern international law, which Spain claims, the that same international law recognizes that Gibraltar has a right to self-determination and statehood.

    And really, Spain should worry more about the Kingdom of Aragon restoting its sovereignty.

    Aug 07th, 2013 - 05:17 pm 0
  • Conqueror

    Just to add to what LEPRecon has said, the results of the referendum held on Gibraltar are still available.
    87.9% of the electorate voted. There were 89 (0.49%) invalid or blank votes.
    187 (1.03%) voted FOR shared sovereignty.
    17,900 (98.48%) voted AGAINST.
    Just as conclusive as the Falklands referendum!

    Aug 07th, 2013 - 05:26 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!