MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, April 22nd 2021 - 02:13 UTC



Ammesty International blasts Venezuela for abandoning human rights instrument

Tuesday, September 10th 2013 - 00:55 UTC
Full article 15 comments
Ms Guadalupe Marengo: “This decision is an insult to the victims of human rights violations and places future generations of Venezuelans at risk” Ms Guadalupe Marengo: “This decision is an insult to the victims of human rights violations and places future generations of Venezuelans at risk”

Venezuela must immediately reverse its decision to withdraw from the American Convention on Human Rights and make a commitment to truly protect all individuals, Amnesty International said on Monday. The Venezuelan government’s decision will take effect on Tuesday 10 September. The withdrawal will leave Venezuelan citizens without the protection of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

“This decision is an insult to the victims of human rights violations and places future generations of Venezuelans at risk. What’s more, it goes against Venezuela’s constitution, which guarantees access to international bodies to seek protection of their human rights,” said Guadalupe Marengo, Deputy Director of the Americas Program at Amnesty International.

“The Venezuelan government’s attitude is highly contradictory. On the one hand it is promoting universal ratification of the American Convention on Human Rights and urging other countries to ratify this instrument while, on the other, it is withdrawing from it and denying its inhabitants access to the protection of one of its bodies.”

The regional and international human rights protection systems were set up to provide everyone with an external body that they could turn to if they were unable to obtain justice and reparation for human rights violations within their own countries.

Venezuela recently supported a resolution urging members of the Organization of American States to ratify all regional human rights instruments, in particular the American Convention. Venezuela has also supported similar initiatives at the level of Unasur and Mercosur.

“Over the years, through the Inter-American Commission and Court, the inter-American human rights system has represented the only possible way of obtaining justice and reparation for thousands of victims and their families across the continent. To deprive Venezuelans of the option of turning to the Court is scandalous,” said Guadalupe Marengo.

“Human rights are the cornerstone of the rule of law and form an essential instrument with which states can ensure that all people are able to live in dignity, regardless of their gender, race, ethnic origin or any other such criteria. We urge the Venezuelan authorities to do everything in their power to guarantee these rights.”

On 10 September 2012, Venezuela presented a note to the Secretary General of the Organization of American States informing him of its decision to withdraw from the American Convention on Human Rights.

Venezuela’s withdrawal does not mean that the country no longer forms part of the Inter-American System, because the Inter-American Commission, as a principal organ of the organization, will still be able to monitor Venezuela’s compliance with its human rights obligations. Venezuelan citizens will therefore be able to continue to send petitions to this body when their rights are not being recognized or protected inside the country.

This decision will, however, limit access to the jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court for cases that arise after 10 September 2013.

Former president Hugo Chavez repeatedly accused the ICC of interfering in Venezuela’s domestic affairs and of being bias since it was “an instrument of the US”. A long list of cases involving human rights violations reached the ICC during his fourteen years in office.

Venezuela has received 15 ICC condemnations because of extra-judicial summary executions committed by members of the police and armed forces; sacking of government employees and attacks on freedom of expression.  However the ruling which exasperated Chavez was claims of violence and ill treatment against Raul Diaz Peña imprisoned six years and allegedly involved in bomb attacks against Spanish and Colombian diplomatic sees.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • golfcronie

    Argentina next????

    Sep 10th, 2013 - 04:41 am 0
  • Stevie

    Well, using these lots arguments, SA needs no Human Rights Organisations, as we consider ourselves all legit, and only the guilty ones have anything to fear...

    Sep 10th, 2013 - 04:49 am 0
  • GeoffWard2

    7 Substantive rights
    7.1 Right to life
    7.2 Freedom from torture
    7.3 Freedom from slavery
    7.4 Right to a fair trial
    7.5 Freedom of speech
    7.6 Freedom of thought, conscience and religion
    7.7 Freedom of movement
    7.8 Rights debates
    7.8.1 Right to keep and bear arms
    7.8.2 Future generations
    7.8.3 Sexual orientation and gender identity
    7.8.4 Trade
    7.8.5 Water
    7.8.6 Reproductive rights
    7.8.7 Information and communication technologies
    8 Relationship with other topics
    8.1 Human rights and the environment
    8.2 National security
    8.3 Relativism and universalism

    Stevie, can you check out this site in detail. I've a feeling that your #2 doesn't stack up. Innocent or guilty of the many classes of human rights violations, I believe that most South Americans are victims of many of these abuses.

    Sep 10th, 2013 - 05:41 am 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!