The US Supreme Court was scheduled to meet behind closed doors on Monday to decide whether to hear a high-profile appeal by Argentina over its battle with hedge funds that refused to take part in two debt restructurings that sprang from the country's 2002 default.
Argentina has appealed an October 2012 ruling by the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York in which the court said the government had broken a contractual obligation to treat bondholders equally.
In two restructurings, in 2005 and 2010, creditors holding about 93% of Argentina's debt agreed to participate in debt swaps that gave them 25 cents to 29 cents on the dollar.
But bondholders led by hedge funds NML Capital Ltd, a unit of Paul Singer's Elliott Management Corp, and Aurelius Capital Management went to court, seeking payment in full.
If the justices on the nine-member court agree to hear the case, the court would likely make an announcement on Tuesday. The court would schedule oral arguments and the case would be decided sometime before the next term ends in late June 2014.
The court's online docket said the case was up for discussion Monday. If the court decides against hearing the case, that would be made public on October 7, the first day of the court's new term.
The court could also ask the Obama administration to weigh in on whether it thinks the case merits the justices' attention, which would delay any further action. The court has one other option, which is to take no action on the petition and delay making a decision until a later date.
The litigation is still ongoing in the appeals court in New York. In August, that court issued another ruling, upholding a lower court's order that Argentina pay the bondholders 1.33 billion. The court stayed its decision pending Supreme Court review. Argentina also has asked the appeals court to reconsider its decision.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesI think it's more likely that the Argentine government is hoping, and praying that the SCOTUS hears their case.
Sep 30th, 2013 - 06:50 pm 0But it is only a delaying tactic. Sooner or later they're gonna have to pay.
I have this sneaking suspicion that SCOTUS is going to coordinate with NY Appeals and turn down all further requests so it's all done at the same time.
Sep 30th, 2013 - 07:09 pm 0It would be nice if they did it right before the elections.
Nice for me that is!
There has already been indications that the Supreme Court doesn't want to hear the case. Plus, it would be very uncommon seeing as there is so much agreement by the lower courts.
Sep 30th, 2013 - 08:22 pm 0The exec branch of the U.S., however, would like it overturned, as it increases individual rights and limits the power of govs to (bully) them.
Tommorow is the day the world will know, though.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!