MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, September 22nd 2023 - 15:26 UTC



First ruling against US government 'metadata' collection; Obama meets top technology companies leaders

Wednesday, December 18th 2013 - 06:43 UTC
Full article 6 comments
Federal District Judge Richard Leon said the electronic spy agency's practice was an “arbitrary invasion”. Federal District Judge Richard Leon said the electronic spy agency's practice was an “arbitrary invasion”.

A US judge has ruled the National Security Agency's mass collection of telephone data may be unconstitutional. Federal District Judge Richard Leon said the electronic spy agency's practice was an “arbitrary invasion”.

 The agency's collection of “metadata”, including telephone numbers and times and dates of calls, was exposed by ex-NSA contractor Edward Snowden. The White House dismissed a suggestion Mr Snowden could receive amnesty if he stopped leaking documents.

On Monday in a Washington DC federal court, Judge Leon called the NSA's surveillance program “indiscriminate” and an “almost Orwellian technology that enables the government to store and analyze the phone metadata of every telephone user in the United States”.

The ruling came in a lawsuit brought by conservative activist Larry Klayman, a user of a Verizon mobile telephone who challenged the NSA's collection of metadata on his behalf and that of a client.

On Tuesday morning, US President Barack Obama met chief executives from the nation's top technology companies - including Google and Apple. He discussed the NSA's surveillance programs as well as government information technology reforms and most probably the legal ruling.

The NSA had ordered Verizon - one of the largest phone companies in the US - to disclose to it metadata, including telephone numbers, calling card numbers and the serial numbers of phones, of millions of calls it processes in which at least one party is in the US.

Judge Leon ruled the plaintiffs had demonstrated “a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their Fourth Amendment claim and that they will suffer irreparable harm absent… relief”, referring to the clause in the US constitution that bars unreasonable search and seizure by the government.

He issued a preliminary injunction against the NSA surveillance programme but suspended the order to allow for an appeal by the justice department, thus enabling the programme to continue for now.

“If the NSA continues to do this, they're now on notice that it's illegal, and we will seek to have them held in criminal contempt of court.”

Through Glenn Greenwald, a journalist with whom he has close ties, Mr Snowden issued a statement hailing the ruling.

“I acted on my belief that the NSA's mass surveillance programs would not withstand a constitutional challenge, and that the American public deserved a chance to see these issues determined by open courts,” he wrote, according to the New York Times.

“Today, a secret program authorized by a secret court was, when exposed to the light of day, found to violate Americans' rights,” he added. “It is the first of many.”

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • GeoffWard2

    Well, Elaine, at least one Federal judge agrees with me.
    Perhaps there are others.

    Dec 18th, 2013 - 04:48 pm 0
  • Condorito

    I agree too ... interesting to go back and look at the comments closer to the time of the leaks:

    Like some of us said back then, Snowden did us all a big favor and US would eventually rule against the NSA and other agencies.

    Dec 18th, 2013 - 07:04 pm 0
  • Fido Dido

    Good news, but bad news will continue, because they don't give crap of what a judge says and “BELIEVE” they are above the law. After all, there are plenty of morons who believe that the NSA “ protects freedom and lives from those terrorists”. Nothing is going to change, because it's all in the patriot act and NDAA.

    Dec 19th, 2013 - 01:50 am 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!