The Argentine Foreign Ministry denied in a statement released on Thursday that Buenos Aires sea port authorities threatened Bermuda registered 'Queen Victoria' Cunard cruise ship with hefty fines if it did not lower its “red duster” flag, the ensign for the United Kingdom merchant vessels.
“They are totally false rumors released by a British television channel and disappointingly repeated by local media such as Clarín and La Nacion, regrets the Foreign ministry.
According to a report from the Argentine Coast Guard to the Ministry, the 'Queen Victoria' is registered in Bermudas Islands, and thus must fly that flag when entering Argentine ports. In effect 'Queen Victoria' entered the port of Buenos Aires 28 January, from Montevideo, and left on the same day for Puerto Madryn and later to Ushuaia with any inconveniences. The ship did not violate any regulations and abided by all rules and no infractions were sanctioned” in any of the three ports.
It must be added that so far the Foreign Office nor the British Embassy in Buenos Aires have contacted Argentine authorities in reference to the 'nonexistent incident'
In an article published in several British newspapers, a former First Sea Lord, Admiral Lord West, who served in the Falklands War claimed that while “dining in the ship with the captain one night, she told how she had been threatened with a fine of 10,000 dollars, and warned there would be trouble, if she didn't take down the red ensign”.
Finally the Argentine release reiterates that the British authorities instead of repeating false rumors should accept their obligation of abiding by UN resolutions which call for a bilateral negotiation to resolve the sovereignty dispute referred to the Malvinas, South Georgia, South Sandwich Islands and adjoining maritime spaces.
The release includes a copy of the report from the Argentine Coast Guard saying operations in the three ports were completely normal with no inconveniences.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesWell at least if they are attempting to deny it then they are sufficiently embarrassed that it happened. As for bilateral, they can have trilateral or unilateral (on their own) but that's the closest they are getting. The UK has no legal right (or desire) to negotiate away the rights, interests or wishes of the FIs without the representatives of the islands being present and so Argentina should just accept that and move on. What they expect to get from either variety of talks is unclear but that's for another day.
Feb 14th, 2014 - 07:29 am 0As far as Britain and the Falkland Islanders are convened there is no dispute concerning the sovereignty of the archipelago so why on earth should they discuss it with anyone - muchos menus Argeentina!
Feb 14th, 2014 - 07:32 am 0Whether the incident is true or false, the simply fact is that it is an entirely conceivable possibility.
Feb 14th, 2014 - 08:30 am 0Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!