A senior Foreign Office minister summed up Britain’s position on Gibraltar firmly and concisely this week in Parliament. “At the heart of this issue is the right of the people of Gibraltar to determine their own future,” said Baroness Warsi, Senior Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
“The current constitution of Gibraltar already includes the assurance that the UK will never enter into arrangements under which the people of Gibraltar would pass under the sovereignty of another state against their wishes.”
“Furthermore, this Government have repeated the assurances given by the previous Government that the UK will not enter into a process of sovereignty negotiations with which Gibraltar is not content.”
“For as long as the people of Gibraltar wish to retain British sovereignty, we will continue to work with their elected representatives to ensure that they can pursue their legitimate interests unhindered by unreasonable and illegal actions by any nation, but of course most recently by Spain.”
“However, it is also clear that co-operation between Gibraltar and Spain offers many benefits to people on both sides of the border.”
“Fostering that co-operation remains in everyone’s interests, and with the support of the Government of Gibraltar, remains our long-term aim too.”
When news emerged last November that a British diplomatic bag had been opened by Spanish guards at the border with Gibraltar, the British Government reacted furiously despite Spain’s efforts to play down the matter.
According to Baroness Warsi British officials were so angry that the Spanish ambassador to London, Federico Trillo, had been summoned at the time for a ticking off. That means Britain summoned the Spanish ambassador last year not twice, as was previously thought, but on three occasions, two of them within the space of a week.
During the debate on Gibraltar in the House of Lords, Baroness Warsi, referred briefly to the diplomatic bag incident in response to questions from Tory peer Lord Patten.
“We did indeed summon the Spanish ambassador and subsequently received assurances that it would not happen again, and to date it has not,” she said.
The British Government made strong public protests at the time – including an intervention by Prime Minister David Cameron – but until now had refused to comment on whether Ambassador Trillo had been called in.
Just last week, Europe Minister David Lidington answered a question in the House of Commons and said the ambassador had been “publicly” summoned just twice, making no mention of the third occasion. But the revelation sheds further light on just how tense relations between the UK and Spain had been last November.
The first was on August 2, 2013, when Trillo was summoned in order to underline the British Government’s serious concerns regarding delays at the Gibraltar-Spain border. The second was on November 19, 2013, when he was summoned following a 22-hour unlawful incursion by the Spanish oceanographic research vessel Ramon Margalef into British Gibraltar territorial waters.
Within the space of a week, he was back in the Foreign Office once again to answer questions about the diplomatic bag.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesSmack smack smack
Mar 13th, 2014 - 10:37 am 0You naughty naughty Spaniard!
Past time that ALL British people and all those that respect self-determination, freedom and the rule of law tell the British government that it MUST respond forcibly to Spain. Assets must be despatched so that intruding vessels can be intercepted and both they and their crews can be arrested. Vessels to be seized and crews to be tried and then imprisoned for 2-year sentences. And there must be a military presence at the border. The Royal Gibraltar Regiment must be deployed to deter the Guardia Civil. Speak up people. The British government IS responsible for defence of the self-governing territory called Gibraltar. No differently to the argies and the Falkland Islands, the Spaniards LIE. And they don't discuss. Because they have no credibility. Or honesty. If authorised, British forces do have the capability. Fast jets, attack and gunship helicopters, hovercraft, armour, artillery. Thirty thousand people are being harassed and attacked. It is unacceptable that this sort of thing can be allowed in Europe in this day and age. Contact your political representatives!
Mar 13th, 2014 - 12:47 pm 0Since then much has changed. ..... naaat !!
Mar 13th, 2014 - 12:48 pm 0Meanwhile, in southern Europe.
http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=33234
MEPs in the European Parliament in Strasbourg yesterday voted to exclude Gibraltar from draft EU aviation legislation designed to harmonise air traffic control.
The MEPs backed a Spanish amendment that removed post-Cordoba language that would have ensured the ‘Single European Sky’ legislation was extended to the Rock.
A number of UK MEPs indicated during Tuesday’s debate that they would vote against the whole proposals if that amendment was passed. ...The overall legislative package was, however, backed by 489 votes to 154.
http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=33234
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!