MercoPress. South Atlantic News Agency
'If necessary', Lula da Silva will be in the 2018 president election
Former two-term President Lula da Silva acknowledged Friday that he is weighing the possibility of seeking to return to Brazil's highest office in the 2018 elections. ”I can't say that I am or that I'm not (a candidate),” Lula said during an interview with Radio Itatiaia. Read full article
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesBring back Lula!
Aug 29th, 2015 - 06:51 am - Link - Report abuse 0Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Bring back Lula QUICK, before he croaks!
Aug 29th, 2015 - 11:07 am - Link - Report abuse 0He does look as though his cancer is on the way back or perhaps it's the worry of having his teeth knocked out in prison AND having to bend over!
GREAT.
I hope he does not come back to power, for the good of Brazil.
Aug 29th, 2015 - 11:54 am - Link - Report abuse 0I hope he come back to power, for the good of Brasil.
Aug 29th, 2015 - 12:12 pm - Link - Report abuse 0LULA 2018!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Xu9Vo2Arpk
@4. It's difficult to put a criminal in power. Except for a criminal country. There's no doubt that LULU is a criminal. Just a clever criminal where the evidence is still being collected. Has LULU had all his accounts investigated? And he gets the money for his current political activities from where? He's a crook. Put him in a cell and torture him until he explains how he did it!
Aug 29th, 2015 - 03:04 pm - Link - Report abuse 0C o x i n h a !
Aug 29th, 2015 - 03:20 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@6
Aug 29th, 2015 - 04:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0merdinha petista...
Hi Jack,
Aug 29th, 2015 - 05:06 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You know although your country is in recession, over the past few months here in Santiago, the city has been overflowing with Brazilian tourists. Wherever you go to lunch or dinner, you here Portuguese being spoken.
The talk however here among Chilean businessmen is that of concern, because if the recession in your country is going to be as severe as some are predicting, our economy (wAlthough not as dependent as other Latin countries) will be hit hard as well. Do you think that Lula and Dilma will be eventually incarcerated or get away with nearly destroying Brazil?
@8 Chicureo
Aug 29th, 2015 - 06:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Good question. The unstable political atmosphere here, at the moment , is obviously the result of the PT's and their allies' actions. First, you've got Dilma overspending in 2013/14 in order to try to impress the population. The result we all know : a whopping deficit in public accounts. Instead of a primary superavit of R$ 99 billion, a massive primary deficit of 19 billion. This tendency had already been verified in 2013, when although a superavit was posted, it was way below the projected figure. Despite this, they kept on spending - and stealing. So, besides the igross incompetence in managing the public accounts, things became worse when compounded by the discovery of the corruption at Petrobras - a continuation of the 'mensalão', with many of the same players involved, even some of those condemned but enjoying light sentences. With all this, plus the perspetive that the corruption has in fact spread to all State -run companies, and especially the BNDES, the lack of confidence to invest has slown the economy down to a standstill, and now, officially in recession. The PT however still does not admit they have any blame ...it's always the same old story, it's the international crisis...the effects of which Lula classified as insignificant as far as Brazil was concerned...Now, Dilma has admitted it was more like a tsunami, but still refuses to admit guilt. The fact is that to the PT, the only truth is their truth. That Dilma is/was corrupt , is doubtfull...she's more like a victim in that she was forced to play along with Lulla, who without a doubt is up to his eyeballs in shit...but discovering the proof is another matter. Lulla has obviously hidden the product of his theft through others, who are now taking the fall for him. On the other hand, with what is already out in the open, Dilma could be impeached. But to answer your question, this is Brazil, and no-one knows what will happen.
Jack,
Aug 29th, 2015 - 09:33 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Thanks for the analysis. In Chile as you well know, we have a moderate Socialist, who's son's “hand was caught in the cookie jar”, but in all fairness corruption on all sides of the political spectrum has been minor for our continent.
New investment has somewhat dried up as Bachelet's administration's new tax laws have made Chile less desirable. She made outrageous expensive promises for several programs, especially free university education, that are going to be very difficult to pay for. Complicating matters is that we derive directly an important part of our national income from copper who's prices are currently averaging $2.25 a pound, 27% lower than last year's levels and near a six-year low. China is our number one export market, I need to say little more.
The good news for Chile, with the exception of the region near Punta Arenas, is benefiting tremendously with low cost petroleum imports.
¡Saludos!
@10. It's a pity about Chile but, barring a miracle, Brazil's fate is sealed. I recall what happened under a Labour government in Britain. It was spend, spend, spend, borrow, borrow, borrow. And so many other things that were bad for Britain, while the Labour Party was “the saviour”. And, at the end, when the people could see what was happening and voted differently, the Labour Party left a little note with a joke on it. It said “I'm afraid to tell you there's no money left”. Very funny - not!
Aug 30th, 2015 - 10:58 am - Link - Report abuse 0The only answer was “austerity”. Because the country had to be rebuilt. And it is being rebuilt. But still labouring under incredible burdens. The constant demands for money by the EU, the mass immigration, legal and illegal, that Labour liked because it gave more grateful voters, the benefit culture. And the devolution that persuaded a chancer like Salmond that it was time for scottish independence.
I can't tell you exactly what is in store for Brazil, but you should get the idea. The matter of Petrobras is a symptom. I gather similar corruption and fraud is being found in Eletrobras. It's probably the same in all the state-controlled industries.
You say “She made outrageous expensive promises for several programs, especially free university education, that are going to be very difficult to pay for.” Surely Chileans have the sense to see that, whatever she promised, it was they who would be paying? What government has its own money? For most, if not all, countries, major promises should be seen as warning signs. They are bribes.
As for whether Lula and Dilma get their just desserts, that's a matter of proof. But start with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilma_Rousseff and follow through the links about corruption. Are Dilma and Lula stupid? Because they are either stupid or corrupt.
11 Conqueror
Aug 30th, 2015 - 12:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0That their judgement should be questioned is fair enough. As the the Harry S. Truman adage said “The buck stops here” was right on the money. But your grand flourish “Are Dilma and Lula stupid? Because they are either stupid or corrupt.” is as deeply flawed as is much of your writings as an “either–or fallacy”, of a False dilemma. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
@10
Aug 30th, 2015 - 12:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Jack Bosta is not Brazilian.
Brasileiro is not member of the human race. He's classified as on of the less intelligent jungle marsupials that is considered an undesirable vermin in Brazil.
Aug 30th, 2015 - 01:18 pm - Link - Report abuse 0#11 Conqueror
I could not agree with you more. Chile does have some positive advantages during this crisis. First is that culturally corruption is rare here. Police are especially honest. That may not really impress someone from Europe, but in Latin America it's rare. Same thing for our regulatory authorities and our independent central bank.
The result is that we have an outstanding credit rating and a conservative national budget that is normally balanced each year.
As far as the to intelligence of both Lula and Dilma, I can assure to that they are both very intelligent, cunning and resourceful. They are exceptionally good at diverting billions of Dollars in state revenues into the hands of their political cronies offshore bank accounts.
And you are dumb, Sire!
Aug 30th, 2015 - 03:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 014 Chicureo
Aug 30th, 2015 - 07:52 pm - Link - Report abuse 0As far as ... both Lula and Dilma, ...are good at diverting billions of Dollars in state revenues into the hands of their political cronies offshore bank accounts.”
I take it this is merely a a personal opinion based mostly on your particular bias, as you've posted no citation in support of your supposition.
@13 brASSHOLE
Aug 30th, 2015 - 10:03 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Sorry to disappoint you, but I am...as well. There are moments I'm not too proud of it, but that is another matter.
@15 which brASSHOLE is speaking now ? Dumb or Dumber ??
@14 Chicureo
Don't bother trying to argue with the numbnuts @ 12&16.....What is public knowledge and notorious means nothing to him. Unless you can prove what you are saying, don't dare emit an opinion. With him it's all about presenting proof (as in a court of Law) and quoting other people's material.
Anyone that has had serious business dealings in Brazil will attest to the outrageous widespread government corruption in Brazil. (I personally was involved in an agricultural irrigation project in Petrolina during 2004-2009. It was not as terrible as Argentina is, but I was appalled.)
Aug 30th, 2015 - 10:09 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You can find countless references to the problem on the internet. Forbes published an article quoting solid sources that the level of corruption in 2013 was estimated to cost the nation over an astounding 53 billion Dollars a year.
Unless you consult some mindless PT marsupial, any Brazilian with an IQ above 60 will tell tell you Lula and Dilma have been very much aware and part of the theft.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/andersonantunes/2013/11/28/the-cost-of-corruption-in-brazil-could-be-up-to-53-billion-just-this-year-alone/
Do a Google search: “Brazil+Corruption+Worker's Party”
By the way, I like Brazil, especially the people.
17 Jack Bauer
Aug 30th, 2015 - 11:14 pm - Link - Report abuse 0“...don't dare emit an opinion..” a euphemism for your simple manure-spreading. Its quite simple, if your not prepared to support what you claim, why don't you just shut big trap and stop making public announcements.
18 Chicureo
The main beneficiaries seem to be mainly business men in “pursuit of personal happiness”. Whereas the politicians who you accuse, have spent their adult lives, rightly or wrongly pursuing what they perceive to be the 'public good'. If they were corruptible evidence of such a tendency would have surfaced many, many years ago.
#199 TH
Aug 30th, 2015 - 11:37 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Terence, I guess you don't read the news much.
Currently, Brazilian judicial authorities are investigating more than 90 politicians, of which most are members of the Worker's Party on alleged kickbacks paid to win contracts with Petrobras. Other government investigations have began of other state-run companies with similar accusations. Rousseff’s previous chief of staff, Senator Gleisi Helena Hoffmann, is under investigation for graft and police have detained the former treasurer of her Workers’ Party for laundering money. The Worker's Party obviously deny the allegations, and it's interesting that both Lula and Dilma participated on the board of directors of several companies now being probed.
The thing that disgusts the world is that these “public good” Socialists have been stealing state funds destined to assist improve the lives of the downtrodden and poor.
20 Chicureo
Aug 31st, 2015 - 12:38 am - Link - Report abuse 0Yes I am aware of what's happening. The president and former president will reap the political fallout, as well they should. But, lets stay with your original assertion that they are corrupt. You may eventually be proved correct. But until then, certainly they're entitled like every one else to the benefit of the doubt.
FOLHA DE S.PAULO 08/24/2015
“There Are No Reasons to Remove President Rousseff from Office,” Says President of Itaú Unibanco 08/24/2015
One of the most influential voices among Brazilian businessmen, banker Roberto Setubal set out in forceful defense in favor of the permanence of President Dilma Rousseff in office.
An impeachment on the grounds of corruption, “judging by what I have seen so far, is not justified,” said the president of Itaú Unibanco.
“Quite the contrary, what we have observed is that Rousseff has allowed a thorough investigation on the theme.”...
Terrance,
Aug 31st, 2015 - 12:56 am - Link - Report abuse 0Obviously Dilma is going to be supported publicly by the business elete. There is a good possibility she'll survive the scandal and no one wants to burn bridges.
You mention Folha de São Paulo and it should be noted at all the prominent newspapers, including O Globo and Super Notícia have been making notable and revealing investigative reports regarding the Petrobras scandal. The revelations have been shocking to the world, but especially to the Brazilian populace. What happened to all the billions? It's really truly sad...
Sincerely and with respect,
@19 Terence
Aug 31st, 2015 - 08:18 pm - Link - Report abuse 0“...if your not prepared to support what you claim, why don't you just shut big trap and stop making public announcements”.
So speaketh the owner of the truth. I am not even going to get into a stupid argument with you, because it is quite clear that you are a ”petista de carteirinha' and will defend Lulla until you are blue in the face.
Just one more : Do not tell me what I am allowed to think.
@ Jack Bosta
Aug 31st, 2015 - 10:42 pm - Link - Report abuse 0This is an open site for the discussion of international relations, not for your personal considerations over which we have no interest.
So how do I know that you have no ability to discuss issues that escape from your kitchen, I suggest you look for sites that are at your height. And stop wasting our time.
23 Jack Bauer
Sep 01st, 2015 - 12:12 am - Link - Report abuse 0You or any other bozo who uses a public forum as an exercise of pure propaganda to vent their own personal vitriol better be prepared to 'back it up'. If you continue to present your opinions as accomplished facts then your inviting a challenge. Incidentally, I don't hold any political membership nor am I ever likely too as politics holds little interest for me as it has no finality.
@24 brasshole
Sep 01st, 2015 - 04:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0International relations ? really ? well then let's talk about your 'kitchen' and the PT shit we'll find in the pantry....or, if you prefer, 'chicken shit'...
@25 Terence
Propaganda ? you too, are just as radical as the idiot above, the only difference is that you don't want to admit it. Piss-off.
@ 26 Jack Bauer
Sep 01st, 2015 - 06:02 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You have forgotten the link to 'piss off'. Here it is to help Terry Hillock:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OCatSsUJwI
:o)
26 Jack Bauer
Sep 01st, 2015 - 08:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0So you have just confirmed that all you have to offer is propaganda to vent your own personal vitriol since you proffer no facts, only your humble personal opinion. Now your proffering mind reading as an additional talent, must be very comforting to assume an attitude of infallibility.
27 ChrisR
Are here's mother's little helper, I'm sure the opportunity will appear where you can summarily execute someone and then all will be right with your world.
I'd be very careful of criticizing anyone or anything with your very shaky résumé, showing your morbid preoccupation with the use of firearms and and the desire to kill people, to wit:
#1. “extra-judicial killings are necessary when the normal course of the law is ignored”
en.mercopress.com/2012/11/26/sao-paulo-city-gripped-in-a-civil-war-between-organized-crime-and-the-police-says-top-judge
#14. “Are you allowed to shoot the perp as he is running away, ”
en.mercopress.com/2014/05/17/brazilian-police-tells-tourists-that-if-attacked-don-t-fight-scream-or-argue
#20 “If it were my decision, ALL drug dealers after one PROVED conviction would be shot by the police if they were caught with dealing quantities again. And I mean right there and then wherever they are. END OF” en.mercopress.com/2013/12/14/pot-fumes-mujica-calls-un-official-liar-after-he-accused-uruguay-of-pirate-attitudes
@ 28 Terry Hillock (you are too small to be a hill)
Sep 01st, 2015 - 09:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0And what is it that the brainless one would do when the rule of law has broken down as it has in Brazil?
I await the judgement of Solomon springing forth on this!
29 ChrisR
Sep 01st, 2015 - 10:54 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Well if the rule of law breaks down judicial executions are definitely not going restore it are they? Perhaps if the police stick to what they're supposed to be doing it would help matters. Otherwise they are just criminals in uniform. Which will assuredly confirm the complete breakdown. If there is a perception that there is no justice then the system fails, because the police need the trust and co-operation of the citizenry in order to carry out their duty effectively. You should remember the adages “the policeman's lot is not a happy one” and “the constable has blundered”.
But then if you're armed with a flame-thrower that will solve the problem won't it? So knock your self out. So you believe an individual like yourself should be allowed on the streets with a fire-arm. I suspect most ordinary people would consider you as just another criminal.
@ 30 Terry Hillock aka The Brainless One
Sep 02nd, 2015 - 05:25 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Was that it?
All the anticipation and you post like the well known amateur psychiatrist who trots out the same old, same old, all the while.
You will be wearing a dress next.
Bet you have never been mugged have you apart from the cost of your education: you overpaid for that?
@28 Terence
Sep 02nd, 2015 - 08:39 pm - Link - Report abuse 0“...all you have to offer is propaganda to vent your own personal vitriol since you proffer no facts....”
Bla-bla-bla.....what other silly recomendations do you have for us ?
@29 ChrisR
the brainless one @ 30 is clearly a politically correct individual. He is so ready to defend the indefensible, to tell people off when they cross the line - the line 'he' has established for everyone else....and don't make any statements unless you are prepared to 'support' them....
Instead of addressing his inferiority complex and frustrations, he tries to sound superior and to bring others down to his own level.....definitely a liberal....repetitive and and sick.
But getting back on track, I think it's just a matter of time before Lulla is exposed for what he is. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but he will pay for his f*cking of Brazil.
31 ChrisR
Sep 02nd, 2015 - 10:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Go and fondle your Freudian firearms, and dream of what you wish you had the guts to do, instead of being the chicken shit you really are.
If I wanted to hear from an asshole, I'd fart.
32 Jack Bauer
Any criticism from you I take as praise indeed as I can't think of many people, excepting your self that I hold in so low esteem. Nobody could make the mistake of calling a neanderthal fascist like you a liberal. In fact your claim of preference for democracy is shown to be a complete lie.
Brazil's corruption scandals reach Lula da Silva: probe into influence peddling 17 Jul 2015
12 Jack Bauer; “..'Military dictatorship', let me clarify one thing : history is showing,.. ..that it was good for Brazil
http://en.mercopress.com/2015/07/17/brazil-s-corruption-scandals-reach-lula-da-silva-probe-into-influence-peddling
18 Jack Bauer; ”..While your agenda may not allow to accept the 'presumption of innocence' the mainstream does.”........the 'mainstream' ? they are the bloody problem !
http://en.mercopress.com/2015/07/17/brazil-s-corruption-scandals-reach-lula-da-silva-probe-into-influence-peddling
Brazil supportive of Mercosur “as long as it does not turn into a burden” January 26th 2015
14 Jack Bauer; “.....but there is still one thing that can save Brazil...it has in the past, and might well do again...the Military.......maybe someone who has done so before, and had nothing to fear from it. It's a matter of comparing the military, to where this damned PT government is taking us.....and I prefer the former.”
http://en.mercopress.com/2015/07/17/brazil-s-corruption-scandals-reach-lula-da-silva-probe-into-influence-peddling
@33 Terence
Sep 03rd, 2015 - 05:33 pm - Link - Report abuse 0based on the fact that there are two kinds of people in the world, those who fart and those who lie, by your statement (see 'proof' above) “If I wanted to hear from an asshole, I'd fart”, is your undeniable admission that you are an asshole....(or a liar....more likely both)..
Only an idiot like yourself would think my critcism of you is praise. ChrisR named you well when he called you the 'brainless one'....you crap yourself and don't even notice it.
No matter what you think of me - re which I couldn't give a sh*t - you are still concerned enough to go back and look for some of the old posts. Thank you. You just reconfirm the conceited idiot that you are.
@31 ChrisR
he really can't help himself.
34 Jack Bauer
Sep 03rd, 2015 - 06:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0“..based on the fact that there are two kinds of people in the world...by your statement..”. Are you senile I have never even implied such a thing?
Not only do you have a rather rudimentary and childish conception of politics based almost entirely on emotional gratification. You don't appear to have any grounding in english or even the concept of irony. What I confirmed is that you share almost all the same political views as Adolph Hitler. Intolerance, in the extreme in that your not prepared to except the opinion of electorate, and actively promote the idea that a coup is an appropriate remedy for your disaffection.
@ 34 Jack Bauer
Sep 03rd, 2015 - 06:37 pm - Link - Report abuse 0“he really can't help himself.”
I know, but it is amusing to watch.
Now he's brought up Herr Hitler, obviously a closet Nazi!
:o)
36 ChrisR
Sep 03rd, 2015 - 08:44 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Be amused because your failure to refute is confirmation that my post is true. Not that I need your endorsement, but thanks anyway stupid.
“obviously a closet Nazi!” obviously untrue, otherwise you would be able to furnish proof
“No way of thinking or doing, however ancient, can be trusted without proof.” Henry David Thoreau
@35 Terence
Sep 04th, 2015 - 05:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Read your #33 again, “If I wanted to hear from an asshole, I'd fart.”.....so, when YOU fart, you are listening to an asshole express himself..
@36 ChrisR
It's true , it is amusing. But I must give it to him, he takes the prize for being a conceited little fart who thinks he can dictate rules to everyone else...or as I said, a liberal, and a liar, and so unsure of himself he requires 'proof' of everything.
@ 38 Jack Bauer
Sep 04th, 2015 - 06:44 pm - Link - Report abuse 0I fully expect him to go the way Stevie “Breakdowns R Us” went only he is still rotating around the rim of the shot vortex of the WC that makes up his whole life. It might take a few months but he has disappeared from MP before and will again.
He obviously tries to emulate 'she who thinks she should be genuflected to' but lacks the ability to lie as well as she does, hence the rather obvious failures.
38 Jack Bauer and 39 ChrisR
Sep 04th, 2015 - 08:10 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Like I said earlier you also have problems understanding english, so you can attempt as much sophistry as like, but meaning is crystal clear.
In spite of your pretenses to the contrary. I've been able to reveal who and what you and mother's little helper really are, by simply using your own words. I guess you both be must really delusioned as you're not going to see the installation of any dictators in your lifetimes. So you are left to engage in futile argumenta ad hominems, as you are devoid of any issues to refute what I have proved.
“We must make a personal attack when there is no argumentative basis for our speech.” Cicero, Pro Flacco, c.58. B.C
@ 40 DOUBLE-DumbAsso
Sep 05th, 2015 - 05:46 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You have overlooked the reason why you are able to claim “as you are devoid of any issues to refute what I have proved.” I don't CARE what you “think” because you don't ever think for yourself but rely on some stupid article or saying (Usually BC) which you seem to believe means anything. It doesn't and you don't matter?
I should have the new hat for your new dress let out, the hatband is crimping what passes as a set of balls between your ears.
41 ChrisR
Sep 05th, 2015 - 07:08 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The point of a debate is to prove your assertion and one of the most conclusive ways is through the most applicable citations.
One of the best indicators that I am successful is when my opponent is so lacking in rebuttals that he loses it and is reduced to only personal attacks, the fallacy of the argumenta ad hominem. Sound familiar, loser? What ever you are lacking in intelligence, you more than make up for in stupidity. “If your brains were dynamite there wouldn't be enough to blow your hat off.” Kurt Vonnegut, Timequake
@40 Terence
Sep 05th, 2015 - 08:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0“Like I said earlier.....”.....just more BS.....sophistry ? don't make me laugh ! You are a liar, and have proven more than once that you never back up your points of view, due to the simple fact that what you post is not your point of view...it is always “someone else's”....you appear to be a spineless little prick, who hides behind an enormous inferiority complex.
Who the hell is 'debating' on here ?? By your rules, which you don't even follow yourself, you try to deny people the right to express their opinions freely - unless they coincide with 'your' truth. Liberal sh*te.
Piss-off Terence...
Ah, before I forget, when is the silicone being applied ?? will your bra be L, M or S ?
43 Jack Bauer
Sep 05th, 2015 - 08:46 pm - Link - Report abuse 0“and have proven more than once that you never back up your points of view” Where and when? all see is a lot of blah, blah that provess nothing.
Your just another loser idiot who's lost all the arguments and is reduced to calling out names because I have exposed the real you through your own big mouth.
“One of the first businesses of a sensible man is to know when he is beaten, and to leave off” ...Samuel Butler
Aha, I see the Fuck-Up Fairy has visited us again!
Just because you have one doesn't mean you have to act like one.
I don't know what makes you so stupid, but it really works.
@44 Terence
Sep 05th, 2015 - 10:27 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You always take the bait, don't you ? it's amusing to see you tie yourself in knots while trying to explain - unsuccessfully - that you aren't an insignificant little man.
Keep your “superior” sh*te coming, numbnuts ! and try posting your own opinion for a change.....oops, I forgot, you don't have one.....unless it's about those who see through all your crap.
45 Jack Bauer
Sep 06th, 2015 - 12:58 am - Link - Report abuse 0So not only do you have comprehension problems, and don't a clue as to what ironic is. You still can't grasp fundamental logic, that no one has disprove another's assertion.
“It's amusing to see you tie yourself in knots while trying to explain - unsuccessfully...” To which you have not, nor can you prove, resulting in that you have simply revealed yourself as a liar.
If your IQ was any lower, you'd need watering.
This is no battle of wits between you and me. I never pick on an unarmed man. If you're gonna be a smartass, first you have to be smart. Otherwise you're just an ass.
Shock me, say something intelligent.
Can you die of constipation? I am a little concerned how full of shit you are.
@46 Terence
Sep 07th, 2015 - 10:39 pm - Link - Report abuse 0having a bit of trouble understanding your rambling and shitty English. Crawl back under you stone, you complexed idiot. You 'turdy' little fart ....
But I'm surprised....you didn't resort to quoting someone else's opinion this time...and showed us that when you express 'your' opinion, it is quite irrelevant. MP should create an 'entertainment' section.
47 Jack Bauer
Sep 07th, 2015 - 11:54 pm - Link - Report abuse 0“having a bit of trouble understanding your ...English.” Not surprised you have difficulty understanding anything; you couldn't tell your ass from a hole in the ground. Once more stupid, you made an assertion in post 45 “it's amusing to see you tie yourself in knots while trying to explain...”, you have been challenged to meet the burden of proof and prove your claim . Which you have not, simply because it's never happened. So the only obvious conclusion as to why not? is because it's a lie.
A very wise man once said, “it is better to let people think you are stupid than to open your mouth and proove you are stupid”
If stupidity was a disease, you would be dead right now.
I wish I had a lower I.Q., maybe then I could enjoy your company.
You are a man who always sticks by his convictions. You will remain a fool no matter how much you get ridiculed for it!
What's the difference between you and a sack of warm puke? Let me know if you come up with anything.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!